OBJECTIVE: Accurate prospective modeling of microwave ablation (MWA) procedures can provide powerful planning and navigational information to physicians. However, patient-specific tissue properties are generally unavailable and can vary based on factors such as relative perfusion and state of disease. Therefore, a need exists for modeling frameworks that account for variations in tissue properties. METHODS: In this study, we establish an inverse modeling approach to reconstruct a set of tissue properties that best fit the model-predicted and observed ablation zone extents in a series of phantoms of varying fat content. We then create a model of these tissue properties as a function of fat content and perform a comprehensive leave-one-out evaluation of the predictive property model. Furthermore, we validate the inverse-model predictions in a separate series of phantoms that include co-recorded temperature data. RESULTS: This model-based approach yielded thermal profiles in close agreement with experimental measurements in the series of validation phantoms (average root-mean-square error of 4.8 °C). The model-predicted ablation zones showed compelling overlap with observed ablations in both the series of validation phantoms (93.4 ± 2.2%) and the leave-one-out cross validation study (86.6 ± 5.3%). These results demonstrate an average improvement of 17.3% in predicted ablation zone overlap when comparing the presented property-model to properties derived from phantom component volume fractions. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate accurate model-predicted ablation estimates based on image-driven determination of tissue properties. SIGNIFICANCE: The work demonstrates, as a proof-of-concept, that physical modeling parameters can be linked with quantitative medical imaging to improve the utility of predictive procedural modeling for MWA.
OBJECTIVE: Accurate prospective modeling of microwave ablation (MWA) procedures can provide powerful planning and navigational information to physicians. However, patient-specific tissue properties are generally unavailable and can vary based on factors such as relative perfusion and state of disease. Therefore, a need exists for modeling frameworks that account for variations in tissue properties. METHODS: In this study, we establish an inverse modeling approach to reconstruct a set of tissue properties that best fit the model-predicted and observed ablation zone extents in a series of phantoms of varying fat content. We then create a model of these tissue properties as a function of fat content and perform a comprehensive leave-one-out evaluation of the predictive property model. Furthermore, we validate the inverse-model predictions in a separate series of phantoms that include co-recorded temperature data. RESULTS: This model-based approach yielded thermal profiles in close agreement with experimental measurements in the series of validation phantoms (average root-mean-square error of 4.8 °C). The model-predicted ablation zones showed compelling overlap with observed ablations in both the series of validation phantoms (93.4 ± 2.2%) and the leave-one-out cross validation study (86.6 ± 5.3%). These results demonstrate an average improvement of 17.3% in predicted ablation zone overlap when comparing the presented property-model to properties derived from phantom component volume fractions. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate accurate model-predicted ablation estimates based on image-driven determination of tissue properties. SIGNIFICANCE: The work demonstrates, as a proof-of-concept, that physical modeling parameters can be linked with quantitative medical imaging to improve the utility of predictive procedural modeling for MWA.
Authors: Theodora A Potretzke; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Christopher L Brace; Parul Agarwal; Fred T Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Yuman Fong; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Frankangel Servin; Jarrod A Collins; Jon S Heiselman; Katherine C Frederick-Dyer; Virginia B Planz; Sunil K Geevarghese; Daniel B Brown; Michael I Miga Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 4.566