| Literature DB >> 31494306 |
Astrid Bergmann1, Elena Jovanovska2, Thomas Schilling3, Göran Hedenstierna4, Sebastian Föllner5, Jens Schreiber6, Thomas Hachenberg7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) may protect remote organs from ischemia-reperfusion-injury (IRI) in surgical and non-surgical patients. There are few data available on RIP and lung function, especially not in healthy volunteers. The null-hypothesis was tested that RIP does not have an effect on pulmonary function when applied on healthy volunteers that were breathing spontaneously and did not experience any intervention. After approval of the Ethics Committee and informed consent of the study subjects, 28 healthy non-smoking volunteers were included and randomized in either the RIP group (n = 13) or the control group (n = 15). In the RIP group, lower limb ischemia was induced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to a pressure 20 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure. After five minutes the blood pressure cuff was released for five minutes rest. The procedure was repeated three times resulting in 40 min ischemia and reperfusion. Capillary blood samples were taken, and lung function tests were performed at baseline (T1) and 60 min (T2) and 24 h (T3) after RIP. The control group was treated in the same fashion, but the RIP procedure was replaced by a sham protocol.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion capacity; Gas exchange; Pulmonary capillary volume; Pulmonary function; Remote ischemic preconditioning
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31494306 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2019.103287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol ISSN: 1569-9048 Impact factor: 1.931