Literature DB >> 31494097

Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in patients with type 2 refractory coeliac disease: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

Christophe Cellier1, Gerd Bouma2, Tom van Gils2, Sherine Khater3, Georgia Malamut3, Laura Crespo4, Pekka Collin5, Peter H R Green6, Sheila E Crowe7, Wayne Tsuji8, Eric Butz8, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan9, Elizabeth Macintyre10, Jane R Parnes11, Francisco Leon12, Olivier Hermine10, Chris J Mulder2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Refractory coeliac disease type 2 is a rare subtype of coeliac disease with high mortality rates; interleukin 15 (IL-15) is strongly implicated in its pathophysiology. This trial aimed to investigate the effects of AMG 714, an anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody, on the activity and symptoms of refractory coeliac disease type 2.
METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study of adults with a confirmed diagnosis of refractory coeliac disease type 2. Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive seven intravenous doses over 10 weeks of AMG 714 (8 mg/kg) or matching placebo. Biopsy samples were obtained at baseline and week 12 for cellular analysis and histology. The change in the proportion of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes from baseline to week 12 with respect to all intraepithelial lymphocytes was the primary endpoint and was quantified using flow cytometry. Secondary endpoints were the change in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes with respect to intestinal epithelial cells; intestinal histological scores (villous height-to-crypt depth ratio; VHCD); intraepithelial lymphocyte counts; Marsh score; and patient-reported symptom measures, including the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Main analyses were done in the per-protocol population of patients who received their assigned treatment, provided evaluable biopsy samples, and did not have major protocol deviations; only patients with non-atypical disease were included in the analyses of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes, including the primary analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02633020) and EudraCT (2015-004063-36).
FINDINGS: From April 13, 2016, to Jan 19, 2017, 28 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to AMG 714 (n=19) and placebo (n=9). Six patients were not included in the primary analysis because of protocol deviation (one in the AMG 714 group), insufficient biopsy samples (one in the AMG 714 group), and atypical intraepithelial lymphocytes (three in the AMG 714 group and one in the placebo group). At 12 weeks, the least square mean difference between AMG 714 and placebo in the relative change from baseline in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocyte percentage was -4·85% (90% CI -30·26 to 20·56; p=0·75). The difference between the AMG 714 and placebo groups in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes with respect to epithelial cells at 12 weeks was -38·22% (90% CI -95·73 to 19·29; nominal p=0·18); the difference in change in Marsh score from baseline was 0·09% (95% CI -1·60-1·90; nominal p=0·92); the difference in VHCD ratio was 10·67% (95% CI -38·97 to 60·31; nominal p=0·66); and the difference in change in total intraepithelial lymphocyte count was -12·73% (95% CI -77·57-52·12); nominal p=0·69). Regarding symptoms, the proportion of patients with diarrhoea per the BSFS score decreased from ten (53%) of 19 at baseline to seven (37%) of 19 at week 12 in the AMG 714 group and increased from two (22%) of nine at baseline to four (44%) of nine at week 12 in the placebo group (nominal p=0·0008); and the difference between the groups in change in GSRS score was -0·14 (SE 0·19; nominal p=0·48). Eight (89%) patients in the placebo group and 17 (89%) in the AMG 714 group had treatment-emergent adverse events, including one (11%) patient in the placebo group and five (26%) in the AMG 714 group who had serious adverse events. The most common adverse event in the AMG 714 group was nasopharyngitis (eight [42%] patients vs one [11%] in the placebo group).
INTERPRETATION: In patients with refractory coeliac disease type 2 who were treated with AMG 714 or placebo for 10 weeks, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the primary endpoint of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocyte reduction from baseline. Effects on symptoms and other endpoints suggest that further research of AMG 714 may be warranted in patients with refractory coeliac disease type 2. FUNDING: Celimmune and Amgen.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31494097     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30265-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  14 in total

1.  Novel Drug Therapeutics in Celiac Disease: A Pipeline Review.

Authors:  Sanskriti Varma; Suneeta Krishnareddy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 2.  Current and emerging therapies for coeliac disease.

Authors:  Laura Kivelä; Alberto Caminero; Daniel A Leffler; Maria Ines Pinto-Sanchez; Jason A Tye-Din; Katri Lindfors
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Joshua Elliott Rubin; Sheila E Crowe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Intestinal Regulatory T Cells.

Authors:  Vanessa R Figliuolo da Paz; Deepa R Jamwal; Pawel R Kiela
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Tissue alarmins and adaptive cytokine induce dynamic and distinct transcriptional responses in tissue-resident intraepithelial cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Maria Magdalena Zorro; Raul Aguirre-Gamboa; Toufic Mayassi; Cezary Ciszewski; Donatella Barisani; Shixian Hu; Rinse K Weersma; Sebo Withoff; Yang Li; Cisca Wijmenga; Bana Jabri; Iris H Jonkers
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.094

6.  Serum Markers of Refractoriness and Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma in Coeliac Disease.

Authors:  Marco Vincenzo Lenti; Nicola Aronico; Paolo Giuffrida; Valentina Antoci; Giovanni Santacroce; Alessandro Vanoli; Catherine Klersy; Gino Roberto Corazza; Antonio Di Sabatino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  IL-15 and PIM kinases direct the metabolic programming of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Authors:  Olivia J James; Maud Vandereyken; Julia M Marchingo; Francois Singh; Susan E Bray; Jamie Wilson; Andrew G Love; Mahima Swamy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Interplay Between Gluten, HLA, Innate and Adaptive Immunity Orchestrates the Development of Coeliac Disease.

Authors:  Jordan Voisine; Valérie Abadie
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Association Between Celiac Disease and Cancer.

Authors:  Irene Marafini; Giovanni Monteleone; Carmine Stolfi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Non-Responsive Coeliac Disease: A Comprehensive Review from the NHS England National Centre for Refractory Coeliac Disease.

Authors:  Hugo A Penny; Elisabeth M R Baggus; Anupam Rej; John A Snowden; David S Sanders
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.