Literature DB >> 31493725

Timing-dependent interaction effects of tDCS with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Minxia Jin1, Ziwei Zhang1, Zhongfei Bai1, Kenneth N K Fong2.   

Abstract

This study was a randomized, controlled pilot trial to investigate the timing-dependent interaction effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in mirror therapy (MT) for hemiplegic upper extremity in patients with chronic stroke. Thirty patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to three groups: tDCS applied before MT (prior-tDCS group), tDCS applied during MT (concurrent-tDCS group), and sham tDCS applied randomly prior to or concurrent with MT (sham-tDCS group). Dual tDCS at 1 mA was applied bilaterally over the ipsilesional M1 (anodal electrode) and the contralesional M1 (cathodal electrode) for 30 min. The intervention was delivered five days per week for two weeks. Upper extremity motor performance was measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Box and Block Test (BBT). Assessments were administered at baseline, post-intervention, and two weeks follow-up. The results indicated that concurrent-tDCS group showed significant improvements in the ARAT in relation to the prior-tDCS group and sham-tDCS group at post-intervention. Besides, a trend toward greater improvement was also found in the FMA-UE for the concurrent-tDCS group. However, no statistically significant difference in the FMA-UE and BBT was identified among the three groups at either post-intervention or follow-up. The concurrent-tDCS seems to be more advantageous and time-efficient in the context of clinical trials combining with MT. The timing-dependent interaction factor of tDCS to facilitate motor recovery should be considered in future clinical application.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mirror therapy; Motor priming; Motor recovery; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31493725     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  9 in total

1.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Conjunction with Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Penelope Vlotinou; Dimitrios Tsiptsios; Stella Karatzetzou; Georgios Kalogirou; Eleftherios Stefas; Nikolaos Aggelousis; Konstantinos Vadikolias
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-03

2.  The Modulatory Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Combination With Mirror Hand Motor Training on Functional Connectivity: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Jack Jiaqi Zhang; Kenneth N K Fong
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Influence of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Dosage and Associated Therapy on Motor Recovery Post-stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alan-Michael D Chow; Jeonghwa Shin; Hongwu Wang; Jeremy Mikhail Kellawan; Hugo M Pereira
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  A randomized sham-controlled trial on the effects of dual-tDCS "during" physical therapy on lower limb performance in sub-acute stroke and a comparison to the previous study using a "before" stimulation protocol.

Authors:  Wanalee Klomjai; Benchaporn Aneksan
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Qingqing Zhao; Hong Li; Yu Liu; Haonan Mei; Liying Guo; Xianying Liu; Xiaolin Tao; Jiang Ma
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with mirror therapy on daily function and motor control in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Wei-Chi Chiang; Keh-Chung Lin; Ching-Yi Wu; Chien-Ting Liu; Yu-Wei Hsieh; Yun-Chung Lin; Chia-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Effects of priming intermittent theta burst stimulation on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: study protocol for a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jack Jiaqi Zhang; Kenneth N K Fong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Virtual reality and non-invasive brain stimulation for rehabilitation applications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raymundo Cassani; Guilherme S Novak; Tiago H Falk; Alcyr A Oliveira
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Prediction of Motor Recovery in the Upper Extremity for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Occupational Therapy Goal Setting in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Retrospective Analysis of Prospectively Collected Data.

Authors:  Toyohiro Hamaguchi; Naoki Yamada; Takuya Hada; Masahiro Abo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.