Jim H Hughes1, Richard N Upton2, Stephanie E Reuter2, Darlene M Rozewski3,4, Mitch A Phelps3,4, David J R Foster2. 1. School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. jim.hughes@mymail.unisa.edu.au. 2. School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. 3. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lenalidomide is used widely in B-cell malignancies for its immunomodulatory activity. It is primarily eliminated via the kidneys, with a significant proportion of renal elimination attributed to active processes. Lenalidomide is a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), though it is unclear whether P-gp is solely responsible for lenalidomide transport. This study aimed to determine whether the current knowledge of lenalidomide was sufficient to describe the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in multiple tissues. METHODS: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed using the Open Systems Pharmacology Suite to explore the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in a variety of tissues. Data were available for mice dosed intravenously at 0.5, 1.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, with concentrations measured in plasma, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, and spleen. P-gp expression and activity were sourced from the literature. RESULTS: The model predictions in plasma, liver, and lung were representative of the observed data (median prediction error 13%, - 10%, and 30%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals including zero), while other tissue predictions showed sufficient similarity to the observed data. Contrary to the data, model predictions for the brain showed no drug reaching brain tissue when P-gp was expressed at the blood-brain barrier. The data were better described by basolateral transporters at the intracellular wall. Local sensitivity analysis showed that transporter activity was the most sensitive parameter in these models for exposure. CONCLUSION: As P-gp transport at the blood-brain barrier did not explain the observed brain concentrations alone, there may be other transporters involved in lenalidomide disposition.
PURPOSE:Lenalidomide is used widely in B-cell malignancies for its immunomodulatory activity. It is primarily eliminated via the kidneys, with a significant proportion of renal elimination attributed to active processes. Lenalidomide is a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), though it is unclear whether P-gp is solely responsible for lenalidomide transport. This study aimed to determine whether the current knowledge of lenalidomide was sufficient to describe the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in multiple tissues. METHODS: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed using the Open Systems Pharmacology Suite to explore the pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in a variety of tissues. Data were available for mice dosed intravenously at 0.5, 1.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, with concentrations measured in plasma, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, and spleen. P-gp expression and activity were sourced from the literature. RESULTS: The model predictions in plasma, liver, and lung were representative of the observed data (median prediction error 13%, - 10%, and 30%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals including zero), while other tissue predictions showed sufficient similarity to the observed data. Contrary to the data, model predictions for the brain showed no drug reaching brain tissue when P-gp was expressed at the blood-brain barrier. The data were better described by basolateral transporters at the intracellular wall. Local sensitivity analysis showed that transporter activity was the most sensitive parameter in these models for exposure. CONCLUSION: As P-gp transport at the blood-brain barrier did not explain the observed brain concentrations alone, there may be other transporters involved in lenalidomide disposition.
Entities:
Keywords:
Distribution; Lenalidomide; Mouse; Physiologically based pharmacokinetics; Transporters
Authors: D Gupta; S P Treon; Y Shima; T Hideshima; K Podar; Y T Tai; B Lin; S Lentzsch; F E Davies; D Chauhan; R L Schlossman; P Richardson; P Ralph; L Wu; F Payvandi; G Muller; D I Stirling; K C Anderson Journal: Leukemia Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Yuan Xiao Zhu; Esteban Braggio; Chang-Xin Shi; Laura A Bruins; Jessica E Schmidt; Scott Van Wier; Xiu-Bao Chang; Chad C Bjorklund; Rafael Fonseca; P Leif Bergsagel; Robert Z Orlowski; A Keith Stewart Journal: Blood Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kami Maddocks; Amy S Ruppert; Rebekah Browning; Jeffrey Jones; Joseph Flynn; Cheryl Kefauver; Yue Gao; Yao Jiang; Darlene M Rozewski; Ming Poi; Mitch A Phelps; Erica Harper; Amy J Johnson; John C Byrd; Leslie A Andritsos Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Thomas E Witzig; John A Lust; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew E Plevak; Terry M Therneau; Philip R Greipp Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Anita K Gandhi; Jian Kang; Courtney G Havens; Thomas Conklin; Yuhong Ning; Lei Wu; Takumi Ito; Hideki Ando; Michelle F Waldman; Anjan Thakurta; Anke Klippel; Hiroshi Handa; Thomas O Daniel; Peter H Schafer; Rajesh Chopra Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Maria Francesca Palmas; Anna Ena; Chiara Burgaletto; Maria Antonietta Casu; Giuseppina Cantarella; Ezio Carboni; Michela Etzi; Alfonso De Simone; Giuliana Fusco; Maria Cristina Cardia; Francesco Lai; Luca Picci; David Tweedie; Michael T Scerba; Valentina Coroneo; Renato Bernardini; Nigel H Greig; Augusta Pisanu; Anna R Carta Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.088