| Literature DB >> 31493093 |
Yu-Hsin Tseng1, Han-Yau Huang1,2, Wei-Bin Xu3, Hsun-An Yang1, Ching-I Peng1, Yan Liu4, Kuo-Fang Chung5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sino-Vietnamese limestone karsts (SVLK) are a biodiversity hotspot rich in endemic plant species associated with caves and cave-like microhabitats. Based on phylogenetic studies of Begonia sect. Coelocentrum, a species-rich and characteristic SVLK clade, geographic isolation caused by extensive and continuous karstification was proposed as the major driving force triggering population diversification and geographic speciation. To test this proposition, population genetics and phylogeography of Begonia luzhaiensis were investigated using EST-SSR markers and the chloroplast trnC-ycf6 intergenic spacer.Entities:
Keywords: Begonia sect. Coelocentrum; Chloroplast marker; EST-SSR; Flora of Guangxi; Glacial periods; Limestone karst conservation; Sino-Vietnamese limestone karsts (SVLK)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31493093 PMCID: PMC6730737 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-019-0267-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Fig. 1Guangxi’s limestone karsts (a–d) and habitats of Begonia luzhaiensis (e–h). a The picturesque limestone fengcong karst (Waltham 2008) along the Li River in Guangxi, China is a habitat for many limestone plants, including B. luzhaiensis. b Aerial photography taken before descending into Guilin Airport, Guangxi, showing the fragmented and cockpit-like karst landscape. c The entrance of a limestone cave in Luzhai County, Guangxi where the LZ population (Fig. 2) was sampled. This cave is also the type locality of one rare gesneriad, Chirita luzhaiensis (≡ Primulina luzhaiensis) (Huang et al. 2010). d Rice terraces in Tian’e County, Guangxi, showing the typical agricultural practices in the region and degraded limestone forest in a limestone karst. e B. luzhaiensis grows in the limestone cave (Fig. 1c) in Luzhai County (LZ in Fig. 2). f B. luzhaiensis grows on a limestone outcrop in Xincheng (XC in Fig. 2). g B. luzhaiensis grows in the entrance of a limestone cave in Rongshui County (RS in Fig. 2). h B. luzhaiensis grows on the base of a limestone tower along the Li River (YS in Fig. 2)
Fig. 2Sampling sites and leaf variation of Begonia luzhaiensis. Dash lines demarcate Liu et al. (2001)’s classification of Guangxi’s karst landforms: (I) karst plain, (II) Fenglin plain, and (III) Fengcong depression. Scale bar = 5 cm
Voucher information for samples used and GenBank accession numbers of cpDNA sequences
| Population (Code) | Voucher (HAST specimen ID) | Collection locality | Geographic coordinates | GenBank accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bama (BM) | Bana Village, Xishan Township, Bama County, Guangxi, China | 24°14′17″N 107°15′50″E | MG063376 | |
| Donglan (DL) | Dawei Village, Donglan Town, Donglan County, Guangxi, China | 24°30′33.0″N 107°19′13.0″E | MG063379, MG063380 | |
| Fengshan (FS) | Paoli Township, Fengshan County, Guangxi, China | 24°24′14.0″N 107°04′00.0″E | MG063378 | |
| Fuli (FL) | Fuli Town, Yangshuo County, China | 24°47′08.2″N, 110°31′22.5″E | MG063293–MG063297 | |
| Gaotian (GT) | Paitou Village, Gaotian Town, Yanshuo County, Guangxi, China | 24°44′25.8″N 110°25′04.9″E | MG063369–MG063373 | |
| Lingui (LG) | Sishan Village, Huixian Town, Lingui County, Guangxi, China | 25°02′27.9″N 110°11′59.4″E | MG063323–MG063327 | |
| Lingyun (LY) | Luolou Town, Lingyun County, Guangxi, China | 24°25′48″N, 106°44′24″E | MG063381–MG063415 | |
| Luzhai (LZ) | Zhongdu Town, Luzhai County, Guangxi, China | 24°43′37.9″N 109°39′50.6″E | MG063311–MG063322 | |
| Paoli (PL) | Paoli Township, Fengshan County, Guangxi, China | 24°25′43.0″N 107°05′46.0″E | MG063374, MG063375 | |
| Rongshui (RS) | Xidong Scenic Area, Ronshui County, Guangxi, China | 25°05′30.2″N 109°12′10.7″E | MG063334–MG063347 | |
| Tian’e (TE) | Dulou Village, Bamu Township, Tian’e County, Guangxi, China | 24°52′21.2″N 107°11′31.0″E | MG063366–MG063368 | |
| Xincheng (XC) | Chengguan Town, Xincheng County, Guangxi, China | 24°03′49.5″N 108°40′08.9″E | MG063348–MG063365 | |
| Xingping (XP) | Xingping Town, Yangshou County, Guangxi, China | 24°54′48.3″N 110°30′02.9″E | MG063416–MG063424 | |
| Yongfu (YF) | Luojin Township, Yongfu County, Guangxi, China | 25°01′12.0″N 110°09′02.0″E | MG063328–MG063333 | |
| Yangshuo (YS) | Yanshuo Town, Yanshuo County, Guangxi, China | 24°46′12.9″N, 110°27′43.4″E | MG063298–MG063310 | |
| Yizhou (YZ) | Yankou Village, Yizhou District, Guangxi, China | 24°29′24.0″N, 108°34′12.0″E | MG063377 | |
| (Outgroup) | Donglan Town, Donglan County, Guangxi, China | – | MG063292 | |
All voucher specimens are deposited in HAST. The HAST specimen ID is encrypted with the hyperlink to its digital image
Fig. 3The results of STRUCTURE & PCoA. a STRCTURE bar plot representing K = 3 of the Bayesian assignment of 165 individuals from 15 populations of Begonia luzhaiensis based on genetic variation of 16 EST-SSR loci. Each vertical bar represents an individual plant is represented by a single vertical line grouped by populations. b STRCTURE bar plot representing K = 11. c The ΔK plot shows that K = 3 is the highest ΔK value. d PCoA analysis is based on EST-SSR loci using GENALEX
Genetic diversity and demographic characteristic of Begonia luzhaiensis based on EST-SSR markers and trnC-ycf6 spacer sequence
| Population code | SSR | cpDNA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| θw | Haplotype ( | |||||||||
| East Guangxi | ||||||||||
| Fuli (FL) | 9/5 | 1.552 | 0.553 | 0.039 | 0.531 | 0.518 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H2 (5) |
| Gaotian (GT) | 5/5 | 1.478 | 0.472 | -0.106 | 0.522 | 0.429 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H4 (5) |
| Lingui (LG) | 6/5 | 1.371 | 0.383 | 0.228 | 0.296 | 0.336 | 0.171 | 0.600 | 0.137 | H3 (2), H5 (3) |
| Xingping (XP) | 13/9 | 1.266 | 0.266 | 0.080 | 0.245 | 0.255 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H1 (9) |
| Yongfu (YF) | 18/6 | 1.261 | 0.264 | 0.212 | 0.208 | 0.251 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H3 (6) |
| Yangshuo (YS) | 15/13 | 1.475 | 0.476 | 0.073 | 0.441 | 0.459 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H2 (13) |
| Central Guangxi | ||||||||||
| Luzhai (LZ) | 20/12 | 1.482 | 0.487 | 0.187 | 0.396 | 0.455 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H6 (12) |
| Rongshui (RS) | 15/14 | 1.326 | 0.328 | 0.142 | 0.282 | 0.313 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H7 (14) |
| West Guangxi | ||||||||||
| Bama (BM) | 1/1 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H8 (1) |
| Donglan (DL) | 1/2 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.142 | 1.000 | 0.142 | H6 (1), H9 (1) |
| Fengshan (FS) | 1/1 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H9 (1) |
| Lingyun (LY) | 35/35 | 1.236 | 0.237 | 0.201 | 0.189 | 0.232 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H8 (35) |
| Paoli (PL) | 2/2 | 1.073 | 0.067 | -0.500 | 0.094 | 0.055 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H9 (2) |
| Tian’e (TE) | 4/3 | 1.245 | 0.266 | 0.569 | 0.115 | 0.212 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H8 (3) |
| Xincheng (XC) | 20/18 | 1.294 | 0.295 | 0.101 | 0.265 | 0.285 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H6 (18) |
| Yizhou (YZ) | -/1 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | H6 (1) |
n (SSR/cpDNA), number of individuals sampled for SSR/cpDNA; AR: mean allelic richness corrected for sample size; HS: gene diversity; FIS: inbreeding coefficient; HO: observed heterozygosity; HE: expected heterozygosity; π: nucleotide diversity; h: haplotype diversity
Fig. 4Distribution of trnC-ycf6 haplotypes, haplotype network, and nested clade design in B. luzhaiensis. Statistical parsimony network was generated by TCS 1.21 rooted by B. asteropyrifolia (A). The size of circles is proportional to haplotype frequency, which is also indicated in the circles. Dash lines demarcate three types (I, II, and III in Fig. 2) of karst landforms in Guangxi based of Liu et al. (2001)’s classification
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Begonia luzhaiensis based on EST-SSR loci and trnC-ycf6 spacer sequence (cpDNA)
| Source of variation | EST-SSR | cpDNA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Fixation indices | Percentage of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Fixation indices | Percentage of variation | |
| (a) Non-grouping | ||||||||||
| Among populations | 2 | 196.28 | 0.932 | 56.288* | 2 | 65.36 | 0.782 | 63.46** | ||
| Within populations | 321 | 232.25 | 0.724 | 43.72** | 128 | 57.66 | 0.450 | 36.54** | ||
| Total | 323 | 429.53 | 1.656 | 130 | 123.02 | 1.232 | ||||
| (b) Groupinga | ||||||||||
| Among groups | 2 | 196.28 | 0.798 | 48.32** | 2 | 65.36 | 0.563 | 44.73** | ||
| Among populations within groups | 9 | 81.32 | 0.369 | 22.38** | 13 | 54.26 | 0.640 | 51.89** | ||
| Within populations | 312 | 150.94 | 0.484 | 29.30* | 116 | 3.40 | 0.029 | 2.38** | ||
| Total | 323 | 428.53 | 1.651 | 130 | 123.02 | 1.233 | ||||
Fst: fixation index within population; Fsc: fixation index among populations within groups; Fct: fixation index among groups
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001
aGrouping based on Structure and PCoA’s results
Tajima’s D and Fu’s F statistics for Begonia luzhaiensis based on trnC-ycf6 spacer sequence
| East Guangxi | North Guangxi | West Guangxi | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tajima’s | 0.403 (0.706) | 1.591 (0.977) | − 0.540 (0.244) | 0.485 (0.642) |
| Fu’s | 1.167 (0.737) | 1.619 (0.745) | 0.728 (0.634) | 1.172 (0.705) |
Estimated spatial expansion parameters of τ, θ and M for Begonia luzhaiensis based on trnC-ycf6 spacer sequence
| Time of expansion (Ma) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.161 (0.338–3.443) | 0.361 (0.001–1.333) | 6.625 (0.333–1047.893) | 0.002 (0.758) | 2.047 (0.596–6.072) |
These parameters were obtained from the mismatch distribution under the spatial expansion model. Value in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals
SSD: Sum of squared deviation
Fig. 5Historical demography of B. luzhaiensis inferred from trnC-ycf6 sequence. a Pairwise mismatch distribution. b Bayesian skyline plot of structured sampling, showing the median and 95% highest posterior density interval
Summary for Mantel tests
| EST-SSR | 0.589 | 0.001 |
| cpDNA | 0.38 | 0.001 |
The result of nested clade phylogeographic analysis of Begonia luzhaiensis based on trnC-ycf6 haplotypes
| Clade | Significant clades and I-T | Significant parameter | Phylogeographic inferences |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | H8 (I) H9 (T) I-T | 1 → 2→3 → 4→No: Restricted gene flow with isolation by distance | |
| 1-2 | H6 (I) H7 (T) I-T | 1 → 19 → No: Allopatric fragmentation | |
| 1-3 | H2 (I) H3 (I) H4 (T) | 1 → 19 → No: Allopatric fragmentation | |
| 2-1 | 1-1 (T) 1-2 (I) I-T | 1 → 2→3 → 5→15 → No → 21 → No: past gradual range expansion followed by fragmentation or a past larger range followed by extinction in intermediate areas | |
| 2-2 | 1-3 (I) 1-4 (T) 1-5 (T) I-T | 1 → 2→3 → 5→15 → No → 21 → No: past gradual range expansion followed by fragmentation or a past larger range followed by extinction in intermediate areas | |
| Total | 2-1 (T) 2-2 (T) | 1 → 19 → No: Allopatric fragmentation |
Phylogeographic inferences are inferred by applying the inference key of Posada et al. (2000) (http://darwin.uvigo.es/software/geodis.html)
(T): tip; (I): interior; D: clade distance; D: nested clade distance; I-T: interior vs. tip clades