Claudine Thereza-Bussolaro1, Hee So Oh2, Manuel Lagravère3, Carlos Flores-Mir3. 1. University of Alberta, Department of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address: bussolar@ualberta.ca. 2. University of Pacific, Department of Orthodontics, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. University of Alberta, Department of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pharyngeal airway obstruction can facilitate some forms of sleep disorder breathing (SDB) in susceptible children, especially in those having class II malocclusion. Changes in the anatomic areas surrounding the pharyngeal region during orthodontic treatment could hypothetically impact the pharyngeal airway dimensions. Management of a class II malocclusion on a growing individual with either intermaxillary elastics or different removable or fixed class II appliance designs have been proposed over the last century. The objective of this retrospective exploratory cohort study is to investigate to what extent the class II malocclusion treatment with either intermaxillary elastics (IME) or Forsus® fatigue resistance device (FFRD) leads to changes in oropharyngeal airway dimensions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients diagnosed as class II with an average age of 12.7years were included in this study, (11 males, 18 females). The sample was divided into group 1: IME and group 2: FFRD. CBCT's scans before (T1) and after treatment (T2) were obtained and analysed using Dolphin software. Reliability was obtained using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and paired t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability test was excellent in all measurements for both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in pharyngeal airway dimensions between both groups (P=0.919). A statistically significant correlation was found for sex, where male patients had the highest increase in oro-space area (ORS), and in oropharyngeal volume. Children under 14-year-old in IME group showed statistically negative correlation for sub-mandibular (SM) and for ORS, meaning the younger the greatest increase. Additionally, individuals younger than 14years had a statistically significant increase in the vertical dimension. CONCLUSIONS: Both orthodontic treatment approaches appear to be associated with a similar increase in oropharyngeal airway dimensions. Male patients under 14-year-old had a greater significant increase compared to female patients and older children. Normal pharyngeal dimensions changes were not accounted for.
OBJECTIVE: Pharyngeal airway obstruction can facilitate some forms of sleep disorder breathing (SDB) in susceptible children, especially in those having class II malocclusion. Changes in the anatomic areas surrounding the pharyngeal region during orthodontic treatment could hypothetically impact the pharyngeal airway dimensions. Management of a class II malocclusion on a growing individual with either intermaxillary elastics or different removable or fixed class II appliance designs have been proposed over the last century. The objective of this retrospective exploratory cohort study is to investigate to what extent the class II malocclusion treatment with either intermaxillary elastics (IME) or Forsus® fatigue resistance device (FFRD) leads to changes in oropharyngeal airway dimensions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients diagnosed as class II with an average age of 12.7years were included in this study, (11 males, 18 females). The sample was divided into group 1: IME and group 2: FFRD. CBCT's scans before (T1) and after treatment (T2) were obtained and analysed using Dolphin software. Reliability was obtained using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and paired t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability test was excellent in all measurements for both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in pharyngeal airway dimensions between both groups (P=0.919). A statistically significant correlation was found for sex, where male patients had the highest increase in oro-space area (ORS), and in oropharyngeal volume. Children under 14-year-old in IME group showed statistically negative correlation for sub-mandibular (SM) and for ORS, meaning the younger the greatest increase. Additionally, individuals younger than 14years had a statistically significant increase in the vertical dimension. CONCLUSIONS: Both orthodontic treatment approaches appear to be associated with a similar increase in oropharyngeal airway dimensions. Male patients under 14-year-old had a greater significant increase compared to female patients and older children. Normal pharyngeal dimensions changes were not accounted for.