OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic discectomy (ED) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open microdiscectomy (OM) and tubular microdiscectomy (TM) for lumbar disc herniations, with the potential to decrease postoperative pain and shorten recovery times. Large-scale, objective comparisons of outcomes between ED, OM, and TM, however, are lacking. The authors' objective in this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ED, OM, and TM. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles published as of February 1, 2019, for comparative studies reporting outcomes of some combination of ED, OM, and TM. A meta-analysis of outcome parameters was performed assuming random effects. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies describing the outcomes of 2577 patients were included. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher with OM than with both TM (p = 0.01) and ED (p < 0.00001). Length of stay was significantly longer with OM than with ED (p < 0.00001). Return to work time was significantly longer in OM than with ED (p = 0.001). Postoperative leg (p = 0.02) and back (p = 0.01) VAS scores, and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.006) at latest follow-up were significantly higher for OM than for ED. Serum creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.02) and C-reactive protein (p < 0.00001) levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher with OM than with ED. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of TM and OM for lumbar disc herniations are largely equivalent. While this analysis demonstrated that several clinical variables were significantly improved in patients undergoing ED when compared with OM, the magnitude of many of these differences was small and of uncertain clinical relevance, and several of the included studies were retrospective and subject to a high risk of bias. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparative efficacy of the various surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniations.
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic discectomy (ED) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open microdiscectomy (OM) and tubular microdiscectomy (TM) for lumbar disc herniations, with the potential to decrease postoperative pain and shorten recovery times. Large-scale, objective comparisons of outcomes between ED, OM, and TM, however, are lacking. The authors' objective in this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ED, OM, and TM. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles published as of February 1, 2019, for comparative studies reporting outcomes of some combination of ED, OM, and TM. A meta-analysis of outcome parameters was performed assuming random effects. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies describing the outcomes of 2577 patients were included. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher with OM than with both TM (p = 0.01) and ED (p < 0.00001). Length of stay was significantly longer with OM than with ED (p < 0.00001). Return to work time was significantly longer in OM than with ED (p = 0.001). Postoperative leg (p = 0.02) and back (p = 0.01) VAS scores, and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.006) at latest follow-up were significantly higher for OM than for ED. Serum creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.02) and C-reactive protein (p < 0.00001) levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher with OM than with ED. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of TM and OM for lumbar disc herniations are largely equivalent. While this analysis demonstrated that several clinical variables were significantly improved in patients undergoing ED when compared with OM, the magnitude of many of these differences was small and of uncertain clinical relevance, and several of the included studies were retrospective and subject to a high risk of bias. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparative efficacy of the various surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniations.
Entities:
Keywords:
CPK = creatine phosphokinase; CRP = C-reactive protein; ED = endoscopic microdiscectomy; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; OM = open microdiscectomy; TM = tubular microdiscectomy; VAS = visual analog scale; endoscopy; herniated disc; lumbar; microdiscectomy; minimally invasive; spine surgery
Authors: Pravesh S Gadjradj; Sidney M Rubinstein; Wilco C Peul; Paul R Depauw; Carmen L Vleggeert-Lankamp; Ankie Seiger; Job Lc van Susante; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder; Biswadjiet S Harhangi Journal: BMJ Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Pravesh Shankar Gadjradj; Hana M Broulikova; Johanna M van Dongen; Sidney M Rubinstein; Paul R Depauw; Carmen Vleggeert; Ankie Seiger; Wilco C Peul; Job L van Susante; Maurits W van Tulder; Biswadjiet S Harhangi Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2022-02-20 Impact factor: 18.473
Authors: Pravesh S Gadjradj; Biswadjiet S Harhangi; Jantijn Amelink; Job van Susante; Steven Kamper; Maurits van Tulder; Wilco C Peul; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp; Sidney M Rubinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 3.241