Literature DB >> 31491735

Analysis of depth-sectioning STEM for thick samples and 3D imaging.

Eric G T Bosch1, Ivan Lazić2.   

Abstract

We derive a model that describes 3D volume imaging in depth-sectioning STEM that is valid for all STEM techniques under three well-defined conditions: linearity, undisturbed probe and elastic scattering. The resulting undisturbed probe model generalizes the widely used idea that the undisturbed probe intensity in three dimensions can be used as the point spread function for depth-sectioning ADF-STEM to all STEM techniques including (A)BF- and iDPC-STEM. The model provides closed expressions for depth-sectioning STEM, which follow directly from the 2D expressions for thin samples, and thereby enables analysis of the 3D resolution. Using the model we explore the consequences of the resulting 3D contrast transfer function (CTF) for the z-resolution at different length scales and illustrate this with experiments. We investigate the validity and limitations of the model using multi-slice simulations showing that it is valid and quantitatively accurate for relatively thick amorphous samples but not for crystalline samples in zone-axis due to channeling. We compare depth-sectioning in iDPC- and ADF-STEM and show that iDPC-STEM can extract information from deeper into the sample, all the way till the bottom of the sample, thereby effectively allowing a thickness measurement. Also the difference in optimal focus conditions between iDPC- and ADF-STEM is explained. Finally, we propose practical criteria for deciding whether a sample is thin or thick.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D imaging; Depth sectioning STEM; STEM; Thick samples; iDPC-STEM

Year:  2019        PMID: 31491735     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  5 in total

1.  A single-molecule van der Waals compass.

Authors:  Boyuan Shen; Xiao Chen; Huiqiu Wang; Hao Xiong; Eric G T Bosch; Ivan Lazić; Dali Cai; Weizhong Qian; Shifeng Jin; Xin Liu; Yu Han; Fei Wei
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Making the Most of your Electrons: Challenges and Opportunities in Characterizing Hybrid Interfaces with STEM.

Authors:  Stephanie M Ribet; Akshay A Murthy; Eric W Roth; Roberto Dos Reis; Vinayak P Dravid
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 31.041

3.  Modulating inherent lewis acidity at the intergrowth interface of mortise-tenon zeolite catalyst.

Authors:  Huiqiu Wang; Boyuan Shen; Xiao Chen; Hao Xiong; Hongmei Wang; Wenlong Song; Chaojie Cui; Fei Wei; Weizhong Qian
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Resolving atomic SAPO-34/18 intergrowth architectures for methanol conversion by identifying light atoms and bonds.

Authors:  Boyuan Shen; Xiao Chen; Xiaoyu Fan; Hao Xiong; Huiqiu Wang; Weizhong Qian; Yao Wang; Fei Wei
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Single-particle cryo-EM structures from iDPC-STEM at near-atomic resolution.

Authors:  Ivan Lazić; Maarten Wirix; Max Leo Leidl; Felix de Haas; Daniel Mann; Maximilian Beckers; Evgeniya V Pechnikova; Knut Müller-Caspary; Ricardo Egoavil; Eric G T Bosch; Carsten Sachse
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 47.990

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.