| Literature DB >> 31491495 |
Mark Broom1, Ross Cressman2, Vlastimil Křivan3.
Abstract
Fitness is often defined as the average payoff an animal obtains when it is engaged in several activities, each taking some time. We point out that the average can be calculated with respect to either the time distribution, or to the event distribution of these activities. We show that these two averages lead to the same fitness function. We illustrate this result through two examples from foraging theory, Holling II functional response and the diet choice model, and one game-theoretic example of Hamilton's rule applied to the time-constrained Prisoner's dilemma (PD). In particular, we show that in these models, fitness defined as expected gain per unit time equals fitness defined as expected gain divided by expected time. We also show how these fitnesses predict the optimal outcome for diet choice and the prevalence of cooperation in the repeated PD game.Entities:
Keywords: Diet choice model; Fallacy of averages; Functional response; Hamilton’s rule; Prisoner’s dilemma game
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31491495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.109993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Theor Biol ISSN: 0022-5193 Impact factor: 2.691