| Literature DB >> 31490616 |
Willeke H Vos1, Leonieke C van Boekel1, Meriam M Janssen1, Roger T A J Leenders2,3, Katrien G Luijkx1.
Abstract
Social networks are sources of support and contribute to the well-being of older adults who are ageing in place. As social networks change, especially when accompanied by health decline, older adults' sources of support change and their well-being is challenged. Previous studies predominantly used quantitative measures to examine how older adults' social networks change. Alternatively, this study explores the impact of changing social networks on older adults' lives by examining their personal experiences. We held four focus groups, two with a total of 14 older adults who are ageing in place and receiving home care and two with a total of 20 home-care nurses from different regions and organisations in the Netherlands. Subsequently, an expert team of home-care professionals and managers discussed and verified the results. Procedures for grounded theory building were used for analysis. We revealed four themes of high-impact experiences: (a) struggling with illness/death of the spouse; (b) working out a changing relationship with (grand)children; (c) regretting the loss of people they have known for so long and (d) feeling dependent and stressed when helpers enter the network. Also, network dynamics were found to follow three consecutive stages: (a) awareness of social network change; (b) surprise when social network change actually occurs and (c) acceptance and adjusting to new circumstances. Together, the four themes of experiences and three stages of network change form an integrative model of the role of social network dynamics for older adults' lives when ageing in place.Entities:
Keywords: older adults; social network change; ageing in place; impact; experiences
Year: 2019 PMID: 31490616 PMCID: PMC6916538 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Soc Care Community ISSN: 0966-0410
Focus group respondents
| Older adults | Home‐care nurses | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Sex | 14 | Sex | 20 |
| Women | 8 (57%) | Women | 19 (95%) |
| Men | 6 (43%) | Man | 1 (5%) |
| Age | 10 | Age | 16 |
| 60–69 | 2 (20%) | 20–29 | 3 (19%) |
| 70–79 | 4 (40%) | 30–39 | 2 (13%) |
| 80–89 | 3 (30%) | 40–49 | 3 (19%) |
| 90–99 | 1 (10%) | 50–59 | 6 (36%) |
| 60–69 | 2 (13%) | ||
| Marital status | 14 | #years in elder care | 16 |
| Married | 9 (64%) | ≥ 40 years | 3 (19%) |
| Partner deceased | 5 (36%) | ≥30 to <40 years | 4 (24%) |
| ≥20 to <30 years | 3 (19%) | ||
| ≥10 to <20 years | 3 (19%) | ||
| <10 years | 3 (19%) | ||
| (Grand)children | 14 | # years home‐care nurse | 16 |
| Yes | 14 (100%) | ≥40 years | 2 (13%) |
| ≥30 years | 3 (19%) | ||
| ≥20 to <30 years | 3 (19%) | ||
| ≥10 to <20 years < 10 years | 8 (49%) | ||
| # years home care | 12 | #contract hours a week | 15 |
| >5 years | 6 (50%) | 32–36 hr/week | 8 (53%) |
| >1 to ≤5 years | 3 (25%) | 24–31 hr/week | 6 (40%) |
| ≤1 year | 1 (8%) | <24 hr/week | 1 (7%) |
| 0 years | 2 (17%) | ||
| Educational level | 12 | Educational level | 15 |
| High (ISCED level ≥ 5) | 3 (25%) | Applied science (ISCED levels 5–6) | 14 (93%) |
| Middle (ISCED levels 3–4) | 3 (25%) | Secondary vocational (ISCED level 4) | 1 (7%) |
| Low (ISCED levels 0–2) | 6 (50%) | ||
|
Notes: Participants all met inclusion criteria of age ≥ 65 and ageing in place, except one (age 64) The two respondents with 0 years of home care were volunteers at the focus group location. Due to a large no show they offered to participate. |
Notes: Participants all met inclusion criteria: working as a home‐care nurse, predominantly with older adults Four participants eventually did not return their demographics form | ||
Figure 1An integrative model of the impact of social network change on older adults’ lives