Literature DB >> 31490550

Diabetes in relation to Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: A pooled study from the International Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium.

Jessica L Petrick1, Nan Li2, Lesley A Anderson3, Leslie Bernstein4, Douglas A Corley5, Hashem B El Serag6, Sheetal Hardikar7,8, Linda M Liao1, Geoffrey Liu9, Liam J Murray3, Joel H Rubenstein10,11, Jennifer L Schneider5, Nicholas J Shaheen12, Aaron P Thrift13,14, Piet A van den Brandt15, Thomas L Vaughan16, David C Whiteman17, Anna H Wu18, Wei K Zhao5, Marilie D Gammon19, Michael B Cook1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is positively associated with various cancers, but its relationship with tumors of the esophagus/esophagogastric junction remains unclear.
METHODS: Data were harmonized across 13 studies in the International Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium, comprising 2309 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) cases, 1938 esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) cases, 1728 Barrett's esophagus (BE) cases, and 16,354 controls. Logistic regression was used to estimate study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for self-reported diabetes in association with EA, EGJA, and BE. Adjusted ORs were then combined using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with a 34% increased risk of EA (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.80; I2  = 48.8% [where 0% indicates no heterogeneity, and larger values indicate increasing heterogeneity between studies]), 27% for EGJA (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.55; I2  = 0.0%), and 30% for EA/EGJA combined (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.58; I2  = 34.9%). Regurgitation symptoms modified the diabetes-EA/EGJA association (P for interaction = .04) with a 63% increased risk among participants with regurgitation (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.19-2.22), but not among those without regurgitation (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.43). No consistent association was found between diabetes and BE.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was associated with increased EA and EGJA risk, which was confined to individuals with regurgitation symptoms. Lack of an association between diabetes and BE suggests that diabetes may influence progression of BE to cancer.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett esophagus; diabetes; epidemiology; esophageal adenocarcinoma; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31490550      PMCID: PMC7001889          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.921


  73 in total

1.  A large-scale prospective cohort study on diet and cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P A van den Brandt; R A Goldbohm; P van 't Veer; A Volovics; R J Hermus; F Sturmans
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The perception of cancer risk in patients with prevalent Barrett's esophagus enrolled in an endoscopic surveillance program.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Bryan Green; Raj K Medapalli; Kate L Mitchell; Jeffrey T Wei; Sarah M Schmitz; Lindsay M West; Alphonso Brown; Marc Noble; Shahnaz Sultan; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Abnormal gastric function in longstanding, insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

Authors:  M Feldman; D B Corbett; E J Ramsey; J H Walsh; C T Richardson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use reduces risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction in a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Linda M Liao; Thomas L Vaughan; Douglas A Corley; Michael B Cook; Alan G Casson; Farin Kamangar; Christian C Abnet; Harvey A Risch; Carol Giffen; Neal D Freedman; Wong-Ho Chow; Shahram Sadeghi; Nirmala Pandeya; David C Whiteman; Liam J Murray; Leslie Bernstein; Marilie D Gammon; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Type 2 diabetes and cancer: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies.

Authors:  Konstantinos K Tsilidis; John C Kasimis; David S Lopez; Evangelia E Ntzani; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-02

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality risks in a large US Barrett's oesophagus cohort.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Sally B Coburn; Jameson R Lam; Philip R Taylor; Jennifer L Schneider; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Gastroesophageal reflux, barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer: scientific review.

Authors:  Nicholas Shaheen; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A prospective cohort study of obesity and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Mark G O'Doherty; Neal D Freedman; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the esophageal inflammation-metaplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence.

Authors:  Lesley A Anderson; Brian T Johnston; R G Peter Watson; Seamus J Murphy; Heather R Ferguson; Harry Comber; Jim McGuigan; John V Reynolds; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms better predict the presence of esophageal adenocarcinoma than typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Kevin M Reavis; Cynthia D Morris; Deepak V Gopal; John G Hunter; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Excess Body Weight and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Hans Scherübl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-04-13

2.  Population Attributable Risks of Subtypes of Esophageal and Gastric Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Shao-Ming Wang; Hormuzd A Katki; Barry I Graubard; Lisa L Kahle; Anil Chaturvedi; Charles E Matthews; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 12.045

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.