Literature DB >> 31490355

Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference: Predictor of Septic Patient Prognosis Depending on Central Venous Oxygen Saturation.

Romain Ronflé1,2, Laurent Lefebvre2, Gary Duclos1, Romain Rambaud3, Karine Baumstarck4, Mohamed Boucekine4, Florence Daviet3, Olivier Baldesi2, Laurent Papazian3, Marc Leone1,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the viability of using the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (P(v-a)CO2) to predict clinical worsening of septic shock, depending on central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2). The prospective, observational, multicentric study conducted in three intensive care units (ICUs) included all patients with a septic shock episode during the first 6 h, with 122 patients assessed. Clinical worsening was defined as an increase of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores ≥1 (ΔSOFA ≥1) within 2 days. To assess the ability of P(v-a)CO2 to predict clinical worsening, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed according to ΔSOFA. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to confirm model predictions. Associations between P(v-a)CO2 and mortality were explored using correlations. Using multivariate analyses, two independent factors associated with ΔSOFA at least 1 were identified: an averaged 6-h value of lactate concentration (Lac [1-6]) (odds ratios [ORs], 2.43 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.20-4.89]; P = 0.013) and an averaged 6-h value of P(v-a)CO2 (P(v-a)CO2 [1-6]) (OR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.04-2.15]; P = 0.029). ROC analysis confirmed that Lac [1-6] and P(v-a)CO2 [1-6] were significantly associated with ΔSOFA at least 1, whereas ScvO2 [1-6] was not. Finally, ΔSOFA at least 1 was associated with higher 28-day (76% vs. 10%, P = 0.001) and ICU (83% vs. 12%, P = 0.001) mortality rates, which were higher in patients with P(v-a)CO2 [1-6] more than 5.8 mmHg (57% vs. 33%; P = 0.012). In conclusion, P(v-a)CO2 may help predict outcomes for septic shock patients regardless of ScvO2 values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31490355     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  3 in total

1.  Septic Shock: Phenotypes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandre Cereuil; Romain Ronflé; Aurélien Culver; Mohamed Boucekine; Laurent Papazian; Laurent Lefebvre; Marc Leone
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.070

2.  Changes in central venous to arterial carbon dioxide gap (PCO2 gap) in response to acute changes in ventilation.

Authors:  Lisha Shastri; Benedict Kjærgaard; Stephen Edward Rees; Lars Pilegaard Thomsen
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-03

3.  Lipocalin 10 as a New Prognostic Biomarker in Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction and Mortality: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Wenjie Xie; Guang Li; Bo Hu; Wei Wu; Liying Zhan; Handong Zou
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.