| Literature DB >> 31490260 |
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31490260 PMCID: PMC6797150 DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Computed tomography (A and B), operative specimen (C), and pathologic findings (D–H) of the patient. (A) Computed tomography demonstrated the circular thickening of the left hypopharyngeal mucosa (black arrow) and a lymph node (LN) enlargement (dashed black arrow). (B) The lesion in the hypopharynx extended to the paraglottic space (red arrow). (C) Operative specimen of the larynx and hypopharynx (left, ∗: cartilage) and LN. (D) Histologic examination revealed vaguely nodular polymorphous lymphohistiocytic infiltrate and no obvious destroy of the laryngeal cartilage (∗) (hematoxylin-eosin staining, original magnification ×50). (E) In the neoplasm, histiocytes were focally clustered with numerous small mature lymphocytes and scattered plasma cells, emperipolesis was apparent (black arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin staining, original magnification ×400). (F) Emperipolesis was more apparent in the lymph node (black arrows) (hematoxylin-eosin staining, original magnification ×400). Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy cells were negative for CD1a (G, black arrow) and positive for CD68 (H, black arrow) (Immunochemical staining, original magnification ×400).