Ahmed AlBadri1, Kreton Mavromatis1, C Noel Bairey Merz2. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Two-thirds of women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) have abnormal coronary reactivity. These women are challenging to assess, diagnose and manage because of a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Furthermore, they are considered to be at 'low risk' by most physicians, often receive no specific therapy and tend to be dismissed from subspecialty care. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) is considered the reference-standard for evaluation of epicardial and microvascular coronary function in response to various vasoactive agents. It provides a comprehensive vascular function assessment for diagnosis, a guide for management, and has prognostic benefit that outweighs the risk of the procedure. We recently demonstrated the prognostic value of assessing coronary vascular reactivity in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia, especially those with no obstructive coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Invasive CRT is a feasible, useful method to identify coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and risk stratify women with INOCA. It has a comparable safety record with other invasive procedures. Future research is directed at optimizing patient selection, streamlining of invasive CRT methods using user-friendly catheters to enhance feasibility in the routine clinical setting, and optimizing treatment protocols, with clinical trials designed to evaluate outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Two-thirds of women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) have abnormal coronary reactivity. These women are challenging to assess, diagnose and manage because of a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Furthermore, they are considered to be at 'low risk' by most physicians, often receive no specific therapy and tend to be dismissed from subspecialty care. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) is considered the reference-standard for evaluation of epicardial and microvascular coronary function in response to various vasoactive agents. It provides a comprehensive vascular function assessment for diagnosis, a guide for management, and has prognostic benefit that outweighs the risk of the procedure. We recently demonstrated the prognostic value of assessing coronary vascular reactivity in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia, especially those with no obstructive coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Invasive CRT is a feasible, useful method to identify coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and risk stratify women with INOCA. It has a comparable safety record with other invasive procedures. Future research is directed at optimizing patient selection, streamlining of invasive CRT methods using user-friendly catheters to enhance feasibility in the routine clinical setting, and optimizing treatment protocols, with clinical trials designed to evaluate outcomes.
Authors: S E Reis; R Holubkov; A J Conrad Smith; S F Kelsey; B L Sharaf; N Reichek; W J Rogers; C N Merz; G Sopko; C J Pepine Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: B Delia Johnson; Leslee J Shaw; Carl J Pepine; Steven E Reis; Sheryl F Kelsey; George Sopko; William J Rogers; Sunil Mankad; Barry L Sharaf; Vera Bittner; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Leif Smith; Wilbert Aarnoudse; Emanuele Barbato; Jozef Bartunek; G Jan Willem Bech; Frans Van De Vosse Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C N Merz; S F Kelsey; C J Pepine; N Reichek; S E Reis; W J Rogers; B L Sharaf; G Sopko Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bong-Ki Lee; Hong-Seok Lim; William F Fearon; Andy S Yong; Ryotaro Yamada; Shigemitsu Tanaka; David P Lee; Alan C Yeung; Jennifer A Tremmel Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregory O von Mering; Christopher B Arant; Timothy R Wessel; Susan P McGorray; C Noel Bairey Merz; Barry L Sharaf; Karen M Smith; Marian B Olson; B Delia Johnson; George Sopko; Eileen Handberg; Carl J Pepine; Richard A Kerensky Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-02-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Manesh R Patel; David Dai; Adrian F Hernandez; Pamela S Douglas; John Messenger; Kirk N Garratt; Thomas M Maddox; Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 4.749