| Literature DB >> 31489337 |
Allyson L Masci1, Emily B Menesale1, Wei-Chiang Chen1, Carl Co1, Xiaohui Lu1, Svetlana Bergelson1.
Abstract
Plaque assays are used to measure the infectious titer of viral samples. These assays are multi-day and low-throughput and may be subject to analyst variability from biased or subjective manual plaque counting. Typically, on day 1, cells are adhered to plates overnight. On day 2, cells are infected with virus. After 3 additional days, plaques are fixed, stained with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody and a HRP substrate, and counted by eye. Manual-based visual counting of plaques is time-consuming and laborious and may be subject to variability between analysts. Also, the assay must proceed for several days to allow the plaques to increase to sufficiently large sizes for manual identification. Here, we integrate fluorescent detection and automated plaque counting to increase the sensitivity and speed of the assay. First, we stain plaques with a fluorescent-labeled antibody. Second, we implement a plate-based cell imager to perform non-biased, non-subjective plaque counting. The integration of these two technologies decreases the assay length by 40%, from 5 days to 3 days, because plaque size, plaque signal to noise, and manual visualization are no longer limiting. This optimized plaque assay is sensitive, fast, and robust and expands the throughput and usage of this method for measuring plaque formation.Entities:
Keywords: assay robustness; automated counting; fluorescent detection; gene therapy; image-based counting; plaque assay
Year: 2019 PMID: 31489337 PMCID: PMC6717064 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.07.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev ISSN: 2329-0501 Impact factor: 6.698
Figure 1Flow Diagrams of Traditional and Improved Plaque Assay
By implementing a fluorescent-labeled antibody and an automated imager, the incubation time of this assay can be shortened from 3 days to 1 day, and the analysis can be more robust.
Figure 2Manual Counting versus Automated Counting
(A) An overview of a 24-well plate demonstrates automated plaque counting with Celigo. A zoom-in picture shows A1 well from the plate. (B) Results from automated counting shows correlation with manual counting. The results are comparable.
Figure 3Plaque Counting and Visualization Using the Fluorescent Staining versus HRP Staining
(A) The increased sensitivity of the fluorescent-labeled antibody enables plaques to be visualized as early as 1 day post-infection. The HRP-labeled antibody allows plaques to be seen starting at 2 days post-infection. While plaques cannot be seen at 1 day with this antibody, detection using the fluorescent antibody shows that plaques have already begun to form. As time increases, the plaque sizes increase in all images. (B) The graph shows that the fluorescent-based method detects plaques as early as 1 day post-infection, while the HRP-based method is not sensitive enough to detect plaques at this time point. However, the number of plaques over time does not significantly increase; therefore, detection at 2 days post-infection can be considered for both fluorescent and HRP-labeled plaques. Error bars represent the SD of the data points.