Ikenna Okereke1, Catherine Hamilton1, Gabriel Reep2, Timothy Krill2, Adam Booth3, Yezaz Ghouri2, Vikram Jala2, Clark Andersen4, Richard Pyles5. 1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. 3. Division of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been increasing over the last 40 years. While Barrett's esophagus is a known risk factor for the development of EAC, the role of the microflora in the development of EAC is still largely unknown and is being investigated further by multiple centers. Our goal was to identify trends in microflora composition along various aspects of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, 12 patients agreed to participate in the study. While endoscopy was performed for surveillance Barrett's monitoring, additional biopsies of esophageal mucosa were taken from the (I) proximal esophagus, (II) mid-esophagus, (III) distal esophagus, and (IV) Barrett's esophagus. Additional swabs were also taken from the uvula and the endoscope used during the procedure. The swabs from the uvula and endoscope were obtained prior to the endoscope entering the stomach, to prevent exposing the endoscope to the acidic environment of the stomach. The most common bacterial elements were identified by amplifying sample DNA using a panel of 5 "universal" fusion primer pairs. The 400-500 base pair fragments created an overlap which covered 95% of the bacterial 16s gene. RESULTS: Throughout the esophagus, 34 bacterial genera were found which had a relative abundance of >1.0. Streptococcal genera were prevalent in all aspects of the esophagus, ranging from 16% to 70% of the bacterial community. Haemophilus genera were uniquely abundant in the Barrett's esophageal tissue but relatively absent elsewhere in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Overall, the percentage of Gram-positive organisms was much higher in the proximal than distal esophagus. The microflora pattern obtained from the uvula and endoscopic swabs did not correlate with any of the tissue biopsies along any aspect of the esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Barrett's esophagus, Streptococcal genera are widespread throughout the esophagus. Gram-positive genera tend to decrease as a percentage of overall flora distally. Obtaining a simple swab of the oropharynx or endoscope itself appears to be a poor substitute for tissue biopsy of esophageal mucosa when evaluating microflora patterns.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been increasing over the last 40 years. While Barrett's esophagus is a known risk factor for the development of EAC, the role of the microflora in the development of EAC is still largely unknown and is being investigated further by multiple centers. Our goal was to identify trends in microflora composition along various aspects of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, 12 patients agreed to participate in the study. While endoscopy was performed for surveillance Barrett's monitoring, additional biopsies of esophageal mucosa were taken from the (I) proximal esophagus, (II) mid-esophagus, (III) distal esophagus, and (IV) Barrett's esophagus. Additional swabs were also taken from the uvula and the endoscope used during the procedure. The swabs from the uvula and endoscope were obtained prior to the endoscope entering the stomach, to prevent exposing the endoscope to the acidic environment of the stomach. The most common bacterial elements were identified by amplifying sample DNA using a panel of 5 "universal" fusion primer pairs. The 400-500 base pair fragments created an overlap which covered 95% of the bacterial 16s gene. RESULTS: Throughout the esophagus, 34 bacterial genera were found which had a relative abundance of >1.0. Streptococcal genera were prevalent in all aspects of the esophagus, ranging from 16% to 70% of the bacterial community. Haemophilus genera were uniquely abundant in the Barrett's esophageal tissue but relatively absent elsewhere in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Overall, the percentage of Gram-positive organisms was much higher in the proximal than distal esophagus. The microflora pattern obtained from the uvula and endoscopic swabs did not correlate with any of the tissue biopsies along any aspect of the esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Barrett's esophagus, Streptococcal genera are widespread throughout the esophagus. Gram-positive genera tend to decrease as a percentage of overall flora distally. Obtaining a simple swab of the oropharynx or endoscope itself appears to be a poor substitute for tissue biopsy of esophageal mucosa when evaluating microflora patterns.
Authors: Frederik Hvid-Jensen; Lars Pedersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Peter Funch-Jensen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Liying Yang; Xiaohua Lu; Carlos W Nossa; Fritz Francois; Richard M Peek; Zhiheng Pei Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Zhiheng Pei; Edmund J Bini; Liying Yang; Meisheng Zhou; Fritz Francois; Martin J Blaser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ikenna C Okereke; Aaron L Miller; Daniel C Jupiter; Catherine F Hamilton; Gabriel L Reep; Timothy Krill; Clark R Andersen; Richard B Pyles Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Samuel Cass; Catherine Hamilton; Aaron Miller; Daniel Jupiter; Kamil Khanipov; Adam Booth; Richard Pyles; Timothy Krill; Gabriel Reep; Ikenna Okereke Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-02-02