Literature DB >> 31489104

Significance of New, Isolated T-wave Inversion in Multiple Electrocardiogram Leads with Regadenoson Injection in Patients with Normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: An Observational Report of 5 Consecutive Cases.

Robert T Tung1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The pharmacologic (regadenoson) stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is used widely in patients who cannot exercise for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). The interpretation of these studies depends primarily on the imaging results because the sensitivity of electrocardiograms (ECG) in this setting is poor. Prior study showed that effects of regadenoson on ST-segment occurred infrequently and had low sensitivity for detecting CAD. The significance of T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads without ST-segment depression with regadenoson injection in patients with normal MPI is described and reported.
METHODS: ECGs were reviewed retrospectively in 64 patients who had regadenoson MPI and coronary angiography for evaluation of CAD from June 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018. Five cases were identified with new, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads.
RESULTS: All five cases had new and isolated T-wave inversion in multiple leads without ST segment depression with regadenoson injection and normal MPI. At coronary angiography, three of the five cases showed obstructive coronary artery disease who received coronary percutaneous intervention. One case had nonobstructive coronary artery disease and one had a normal coronary artery.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite nonspecific ST-T changes on baseline ECGs and normal MPI in all patients, three of five cases had obstructive CAD by coronary angiography. New, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads with regadenoson injection were observed in our patients with normal MPI. These ECG findings may be associated with false negative MPI. Therefore, careful observation and scrutiny of all ECG changes, especially new, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads during regadenoson MPI is advisable to identify potential obstructive CAD despite normal MPI findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; electrocardiograph; regadenoson

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489104      PMCID: PMC6710022     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kans J Med        ISSN: 1948-2035


INTRODUCTION

The exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) is a well-validated procedure for establishing the diagnosis of obstructive coronary heart disease (CAD).1 One of the most identifiable ECG signs of myocardial ischemia during exercise testing is an ST-segment change. T-wave inversion can be seen on ECG in acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina and myocardial infarction.2,3 For patients who cannot exercise adequately, pharmacologic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using adenosine, dipyridamole, and regadenoson is used widely as a diagnostic tool for detecting obstructive CAD.4,5 The interpretation of these studies depends primarily on the imaging results because the sensitivity of ECG in this setting is poor.5,6 Adenosine-induced ST-segment depression is a highly specific marker for obstructive CAD. However, other ECG changes during pharmacologic stress testing have not been well described in predicting CAD.7 Specifically, the significance of T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads without ST-segment depression during regadenoson injection was described in a series of patients with normal MPI.

METHODS

ECGs were reviewed retrospectively in 64 consecutive patients who had regadenoson MPI and coronary angiography for evaluation of CAD from June 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018. Five cases were identified with new, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads with regadenoson injection.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics, ECG, and coronary angiographic findings of these five cases are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Despite normal MPI in these patients, coronary angiography was performed because their clinical presentations were highly suggestive of significant CAD. The ECGs before and after regadenoson injection in cases one, two, and three are shown in Figure 1. At coronary angiography, three of the five cases showed obstructive coronary artery disease, three underwent percutaneous intervention, and case five had non-obstructive CAD as determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR) method.8
Table 1

Patient’s characteristics and clinical presentation.

Case Number12345
SexMaleMaleMaleMaleMale
Age (years)7559637455
Known CAD+
Risk Factors
 Hypertension++++
 Diabetes+++
 Hyperlipidemia+++++
 Smoking history+++
 Early family history of CAD++
Clinical Presentations
 Typical angina++++
 Dyspnea+
Table 2

ECG and coronary angiographic findings.

CaseBaseline ECGECG: Regadenoson - T-Wave InversionOther DescriptionCoronary Angiography FindingsTreatment
Onset (sec)Offset (min)Lead Location
1Flat T-V5–6, inversion aVF< 502:50II, III, V3–6Mild Biphasic T in V370% mLAD, 80% D1, 80% RI, 80% RPDAPCI to all 4 lesions
2Flat T in V3–650> 4:50II, III, aVF, V3–6NormalNone
3Flat T in II, III, aVF, V3–650> 4:50II, III, aVF, V3–690% mLAD, 50% D1PCI to LAD and D1
4Flat T in II, III, aVF, V4–6609:50II, III, aVF, V3–6Mild Biphasic T in V3 – 495% LADPCI to LAD
5Notched T V3–5, inverted V2–3502:50V4–6Flattening T in II, III, aVF40% LAD & RI, (−) FFR*Medical

FFR of 0.85 in LAD, 0.98 in RI; normal value: < 0.8.

Abbreviations: D1: first diagonal branch of left anterior descending artery; ECG: electrocardiography; FFR: fraction flow reserve; min: minutes; mLAD: mid left anterior descending artery; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RI: ramus intermedius; RPDA: right posterior descending artery; sec: seconds

Figure 1

ECGs before and after regadenoson injection.

DISCUSSION

The electrophysiologic consequences of myocardial ischemia are responsible for the typical ST-T wave abnormalities seen on the ECG.9 The ST-segment coincides with the plateau or phase two of ventricular repolarization, and the T-wave reflects the time sequence of phase three repolarization. The action potentials become markedly altered during localized myocardial ischemia with exercise testing resulting in ST-T changes. There are multiple causes of T-wave inversion and they are well described in the literature.10 In patients with unstable angina, T-wave inversion in the precordial leads have been reported since 1982 as narrow, sharp, and symmetrical waves reflecting high grade stenosis of proximal LAD.11 The ST-segment depression and/or elevation during pharmacologic stress MPI were associated with severe CAD or future cardiac event.12,13 Regadenoson is a selective A2a receptor agonist that causes coronary vasodilatation through the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, stimulation of potassium channels, and decreased intracellular calcium uptake.14 The effects of regadenoson on ST-segment was studied by Zahid et al.7 ST-segment depression was seen in 15.7% of patients, however, the sensitivity of the finding for predicting ischemia on the nuclear images was low (7.0%), therefore, it was thought of little clinical value. The effects of regadenoson on T-wave has not been reported to our knowledge. In all our cases, new, isolated T-wave inversion were observed in multiple ECG leads after regadenoson injection without ST-segment depression. All cases had nonspecific ST-T changes on their baseline ECGs and normal MPI. At coronary angiography, three of five had obstructive CAD. The exact mechanism for this diffuse, new T-wave inversion without ST-segment changes after regadenoson infusion is not known. It may represent transient but diffuse micro-vascular ischemia induced by regadenoson as the location of T-wave changes on ECG are not corresponding to the anatomical location(s) of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary angiography in cases three and four. Thus, the transient and diffuse micro-vascular ischemia after regadenoson injection might blunt its vasodilatory effects on epicardial coronaries leading to false negative results of MPI in those patients with severe CAD. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the exact mechanisms of these ECG changes with regadenoson injection. In conclusion, our case series showed for the first time that new, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple ECG leads with regadenoson injection were observed in our patients with normal MPI. These ECG findings may be associated with false negative MPI as three of them had obstructive CAD, but future, larger studies are needed for definitive conclusions regarding these ECG findings. At this time, careful observation and scrutiny of all ECG changes, especially new, isolated T-wave inversion in multiple leads with regadenoson injection during pharmacological MPI is advisable to identify potential obstructive CAD despite normal MPI findings.
  14 in total

1.  Specificity of the stress electrocardiogram during adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging in patients taking digoxin.

Authors:  C Y Hart; T D Miller; D O Hodge; R J Gibbons
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Prevalence and significance of electrocardiographic changes and side effect profile of regadenoson compared with adenosine during myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Maliha Zahid; Aaysha Kapila; Cecelia E Eagan; David A Yusko; Edwin D Miller; Cheryl D Missenda
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-02-27

3.  Assessment of coronary artery disease using single-photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201 during adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; J Heo; T Nguyen; S G Beer; V Cave; J D Ogilby; W Untereker; B L Segal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion: classification, differential diagnosis, and caveats.

Authors:  Elias B Hanna; David Luke Glancy
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Thallium-201 scintigraphy after intravenous infusion of adenosine compared with exercise thallium testing in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E P Coyne; D A Belvedere; P R Vande Streek; F L Weiland; R B Evans; L J Spaccavento
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J S Alpert; K Thygesen; E Antman; J P Bassand
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Regadenoson: a new myocardial stress agent.

Authors:  Wael Al Jaroudi; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Acute myocardial ischemia: cellular mechanisms underlying ST segment elevation.

Authors:  José M Di Diego; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.438

10.  Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. The GE SPECT Multicenter Adenosine Study Group.

Authors:  N C Gupta; D J Esterbrooks; D E Hilleman; S M Mohiuddin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.