Literature DB >> 31488611

Robust Control in Human Reaching Movements: A Model-Free Strategy to Compensate for Unpredictable Disturbances.

Frédéric Crevecoeur1,2, Stephen H Scott3,4, Tyler Cluff5,6.   

Abstract

Current models of motor learning suggest that multiple timescales support adaptation to changes in visual or mechanical properties of the environment. These models capture patterns of learning and memory across a broad range of tasks, yet do not consider the possibility that rapid changes in behavior may occur without adaptation. Such changes in behavior may be desirable when facing transient disturbances, or when unpredictable changes in visual or mechanical properties of the task make it difficult to form an accurate model of the perturbation. Whether humans can modulate control strategies without an accurate model of the perturbation remains unknown. Here we frame this question in the context of robust control (H ∞-control), a control strategy that specifically considers unpredictable disturbances by increasing initial movement speed and feedback gains. Correspondingly, we demonstrate in two human reaching experiments including males and females that the occurrence of a single unpredictable disturbance led to an increase in movement speed and in the gain of rapid feedback responses to mechanical disturbances on subsequent movements. This strategy reduced perturbation-related motion regardless of the direction of the perturbation. Furthermore, we found that changes in the control strategy were associated with co-contraction, which amplified the gain of muscle responses to both lengthening and shortening perturbations. These results have important implications for studies on motor adaptation because they highlight that trial-by-trial changes in limb motion also reflected changes in control strategies dissociable from error-based adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans and animals use internal representations of movement dynamics to anticipate the impact of predictable disturbances. However, we are often confronted with transient or unpredictable disturbances, and it remains unknown whether and how the nervous system handles these disturbances over fast time scales. Here we hypothesized that humans can modulate their control strategy to make reaching movements less sensitive to perturbations. We tested this hypothesis in the framework of robust control, and found changes in movement speed and feedback gains consistent with the model predictions. These changes impacted participants' behavior on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that compensation for disturbances over fast time scales involves a robust control strategy, which potentially plays a key role in motor planning and execution.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor adaptation; optimal feedback control; reaching control; robust control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31488611      PMCID: PMC6786821          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0770-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control.

Authors:  Kan Singh; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Environmental consistency determines the rate of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Alkis M Hadjiosif; Matthew A Hemphill; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The regulation of presynaptic inhibition during co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in man.

Authors:  J Nielsen; Y Kagamihara
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Etienne Burdet; Keng Peng Tee; Rieko Osu; Chee-Meng Chew; Theodore E Milner; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Beyond muscles stiffness: importance of state-estimation to account for very fast motor corrections.

Authors:  Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Mini-max feedback control as a computational theory of sensorimotor control in the presence of structural uncertainty.

Authors:  Yuki Ueyama
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  13 in total

1.  Selecting and Executing Actions for Rewards.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Gerard Derosiere
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Random Practice Enhances Retention and Spatial Transfer in Force Field Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Anne Focke; Philipp Maurus; Benjamin Thürer; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Robustness in Human Manipulation of Dynamically Complex Objects through Control Contraction Metrics.

Authors:  Salah Bazzi; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2020-02-10

5.  Feedback Adaptation to Unpredictable Force Fields in 250 ms.

Authors:  Frédéric Crevecoeur; James Mathew; Marie Bastin; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-29

6.  Rapid Changes in Movement Representations during Human Reaching Could Be Preserved in Memory for at Least 850 ms.

Authors:  James Mathew; Philippe Lefevre; Frederic Crevecoeur
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-12-02

Review 7.  Adaptive Feedback Control in Human Reaching Adaptation to Force Fields.

Authors:  James Mathew; Frédéric Crevecoeur
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Kevin P Cross; Parsa Balalaie; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching.

Authors:  Frédéric Crevecoeur; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-02-05

10.  Movement Kinematics and Interjoint Coordination Are Influenced by Target Location and Arm in 6-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Rogerio B Balthazar; Charmayne M L Hughes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.