Barukh B Rohde1,2,3, Kyran M Staunton4,5, Nicholas C Zeak6,4,5, Nigel Beebe7,8, Nigel Snoad9, Artiom Bondarenco10, Catherine Liddington7, Jason A Anderson7, Wei Xiang11, Richard W Mankin12, Scott A Ritchie4,5. 1. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. barukh94-work@yahoo.com. 2. College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia. barukh94-work@yahoo.com. 3. Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia. barukh94-work@yahoo.com. 4. College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia. 5. Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia. 6. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 7. Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 8. School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 9. Verily Life Sciences, 259 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 10. Land and Water, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 11. College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4878, Australia. 12. Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL, USA. Richard.Mankin@ars.usda.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sterile male rear-and-release programmes are of growing interest for controlling Aedes aegypti, including use an "incompatible insect technique" (IIT) to suppress transmission of dengue, Zika, and other viruses. Under IIT, males infected with Wolbachia are released into the suppression area to induce cytoplasmic incompatibility in uninfected populations. These and similar mosquito-release programmes require cost-effective field surveys of both sexes to optimize the locations, timing, and quantity of releases. Unfortunately, traps that sample male Ae. aegypti effectively are expensive and usually require mains power. Recently, an electronic lure was developed that attracts males using a 484 Hz sinusoidal tone mimicking the female wingbeat frequencies, broadcast in a 120 s on/off cycle. When deployed in commercially available gravid Aedes traps (GATs), the new combination, sound-GAT (SGAT), captures both males and females effectively. Given its success, there is interest in optimizing SGAT to reduce cost and power usage while maximizing catch rates. METHODS: Options considered in this study included use of a smaller, lower-power microcontroller (Tiny) with either the original or a lower-cost speaker (lcS). A 30 s on/off cycle was tested in addition to the original 120 s cycle to minimize the potential that the longer cycle induced habituation. The original SGAT was compared against other traps incorporating the Tiny-based lures for mosquito capture in a large semi-field cage. The catch rates in waterproofed versions of this trap were then compared with catch rates in standard [BG-Sentinel 2 (BGS 2); Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany] traps during an IIT field study in the Innisfail region of Queensland, Australia in 2017. RESULTS: The system with a low-power microcontroller and low-cost speaker playing a 30 s tone (Tiny-lcS-30s) caught the highest proportion of males. The mean proportions of males caught in a semi-field cage were not significantly different among the original design and the four low-power, low-cost versions of the SGAT. During the IIT field study, the waterproofed version of the highest-rated, Tiny-lcS-30s SGAT captured male Ae. aegypti at similar rates as co-located BGS-2 traps. CONCLUSIONS: Power- and cost-optimized, waterproofed versions of male Ae. aegypti acoustic lures in GATs are now available for field use in areas with sterile male mosquito rear-and-release programmes.
BACKGROUND: Sterile male rear-and-release programmes are of growing interest for controlling Aedes aegypti, including use an "incompatible insect technique" (IIT) to suppress transmission of dengue, Zika, and other viruses. Under IIT, males infected with Wolbachia are released into the suppression area to induce cytoplasmic incompatibility in uninfected populations. These and similar mosquito-release programmes require cost-effective field surveys of both sexes to optimize the locations, timing, and quantity of releases. Unfortunately, traps that sample male Ae. aegypti effectively are expensive and usually require mains power. Recently, an electronic lure was developed that attracts males using a 484 Hz sinusoidal tone mimicking the female wingbeat frequencies, broadcast in a 120 s on/off cycle. When deployed in commercially available gravid Aedes traps (GATs), the new combination, sound-GAT (SGAT), captures both males and females effectively. Given its success, there is interest in optimizing SGAT to reduce cost and power usage while maximizing catch rates. METHODS: Options considered in this study included use of a smaller, lower-power microcontroller (Tiny) with either the original or a lower-cost speaker (lcS). A 30 s on/off cycle was tested in addition to the original 120 s cycle to minimize the potential that the longer cycle induced habituation. The original SGAT was compared against other traps incorporating the Tiny-based lures for mosquito capture in a large semi-field cage. The catch rates in waterproofed versions of this trap were then compared with catch rates in standard [BG-Sentinel 2 (BGS 2); Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany] traps during an IIT field study in the Innisfail region of Queensland, Australia in 2017. RESULTS: The system with a low-power microcontroller and low-cost speaker playing a 30 s tone (Tiny-lcS-30s) caught the highest proportion of males. The mean proportions of males caught in a semi-field cage were not significantly different among the original design and the four low-power, low-cost versions of the SGAT. During the IIT field study, the waterproofed version of the highest-rated, Tiny-lcS-30s SGAT captured male Ae. aegypti at similar rates as co-located BGS-2 traps. CONCLUSIONS: Power- and cost-optimized, waterproofed versions of male Ae. aegypti acoustic lures in GATs are now available for field use in areas with sterile male mosquito rear-and-release programmes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Female wingbeat; Gravid Aedes Trap; Vector control
Authors: Emily S Jentes; Gilles Poumerol; Mark D Gershman; David R Hill; Johan Lemarchand; Rosamund F Lewis; J Erin Staples; Oyewale Tomori; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Thomas P Monath Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: R W Mankin; J B Anderson; A Mizrach; N D Epsky; D Shuman; R R Heath; M Mazor; A Hetzroni; J Grinshpun; P W Taylor; S L Garrett Journal: J Econ Entomol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Ary Farajollahi; Banugopan Kesavaraju; Dana C Price; Gregory M Williams; Sean P Healy; Randy Gaugler; Mark P Nelder Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.278
Authors: Scott A Ritchie; Petrina H Johnson; Anthony J Freeman; Robin G Odell; Neal Graham; Paul A Dejong; Graeme W Standfield; Richard W Sale; Scott L O'Neill Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2011-03-22
Authors: Samir Bhatt; Peter W Gething; Oliver J Brady; Jane P Messina; Andrew W Farlow; Catherine L Moyes; John M Drake; John S Brownstein; Anne G Hoen; Osman Sankoh; Monica F Myers; Dylan B George; Thomas Jaenisch; G R William Wint; Cameron P Simmons; Thomas W Scott; Jeremy J Farrar; Simon I Hay Journal: Nature Date: 2013-04-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kyran M Staunton; Jianyi Liu; Michael Townsend; Mark Desnoyer; Paul Howell; Jacob E Crawford; Wei Xiang; Nigel Snoad; Thomas R Burkot; Scott A Ritchie Journal: Insects Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: Kyran M Staunton; Donovan Leiva; Alvaro Cruz; Joelyn Goi; Carlos Arisqueta; Jianyi Liu; Mark Desnoyer; Paul Howell; Francia Espinosa; Azael Che Mendoza; Stephan Karl; Jacob E Crawford; Wei Xiang; Pablo Manrique-Saide; Nicole L Achee; John P Grieco; Scott A Ritchie; Thomas R Burkot; Nigel Snoad Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2021-02-25
Authors: Stefano S Garcia Castillo; Kevin S Pritts; Raksha S Krishnan; Laura C Harrington; Garrett P League Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Perran A Ross; Jason K Axford; Qiong Yang; Kyran M Staunton; Scott A Ritchie; Kelly M Richardson; Ary A Hoffmann Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-01-23
Authors: Tom Swan; Tanya L Russell; Thomas R Burkot; Jianyi Liu; Scott A Ritchie; Kyran M Staunton Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 2.278