Literature DB >> 31486534

Seasonal windows of opportunity in milkweed-monarch interactions.

Louie H Yang1, Meredith L Cenzer1.   

Abstract

Many organisms experience seasonal windows of opportunity for growth and reproduction. These windows represent intervals in time when organisms experience improved prospects for advancing their life history objectives, constrained by the combined effects of seasonally variable biotic and abiotic conditions acting independently or in combination. Although seasonal windows of opportunity are likely to be widespread in nature, relatively few studies have conducted the repeated observations necessary to identify them or suggest the factors that structure them in time. Here, we present the results of three experimental studies conducted at different field sites in three different years in which we manipulated the phenology of monarch caterpillars (Danaus plexippus) throughout the growing season. The primary aims of these experiments were (1) to identify seasonal windows of opportunity for successful larval development on milkweed (Asclepias spp.), and (2) to suggest which factors are most likely to constrain these windows of opportunity in time. We found strong seasonal windows of opportunity in the developmental success of monarchs, with distinct periods of higher developmental prospects during each study year. We evaluated the role of seasonal variation in abiotic thermal stress, host plant density, host plant defensive traits, and natural enemy risk as potential factors that may limit seasonal windows of opportunity. By comparing the seasonal patterns of larval success and potential explanatory factors across all 3 yr, we find patterns that are consistent with seasonally variable abiotic conditions, host plant availability, host plant traits, and natural enemy risk factors. These results suggest the potential for seasonal variation in the factors that limit monarch larval development and population growth. More generally, this study also highlights the value of temporally explicit experimental studies that can identify and examine seasonal patterns in species interactions.
© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Asclepiaszzm321990; zzm321990Danaus plexippuszzm321990; match-mismatch; monarch caterpillars; phenological shift; phenology-ontogeny landscape; seasonal fitness landscape; temporally explicit ecology; windows of opportunity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31486534     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  3 in total

1.  Different factors limit early- and late-season windows of opportunity for monarch development.

Authors:  Louie H Yang; Karen Swan; Eric Bastin; Jessica Aguilar; Meredith Cenzer; Andrew Codd; Natalie Gonzalez; Tracie Hayes; August Higgins; Xang Lor; Chido Macharaga; Marshall McMunn; Kenya Oto; Nicholas Winarto; Darren Wong; Tabatha Yang; Numan Afridi; Sarah Aguilar; Amelia Allison; Arden Ambrose-Winters; Edwin Amescua; Mattias Apse; Nancy Avoce; Kirstin Bastin; Emily Bolander; Jessica Burroughs; Cristian Cabrera; Madeline Candy; Ariana Cavett; Melina Cavett; Lemuel Chang; Miles Claret; Delaney Coleman; Jacob Concha; Paxson Danzer; Joe DaRosa; Audrey Dufresne; Claire Duisenberg; Allyson Earl; Emily Eckey; Maddie English; Alexander Espejo; Erika Faith; Amy Fang; Alejandro Gamez; Jackelin Garcini; Julie Garcini; Giancarlo Gilbert-Igelsrud; Kelly Goedde-Matthews; Sarah Grahn; Paloma Guerra; Vanessa Guerra; Madison Hagedorn; Katie Hall; Griffin Hall; Jake Hammond; Cody Hargadon; Victoria Henley; Sarah Hinesley; Celeste Jacobs; Camille Johnson; Tattiana Johnson; Zachary Johnson; Emma Juchau; Celeste Kaplan; Andrew Katznelson; Ronja Keeley; Tatum Kubik; Theodore Lam; Chalinee Lansing; Andrea Lara; Vivian Le; Breana Lee; Kyra Lee; Maddy Lemmo; Scott Lucio; Angela Luo; Salman Malakzay; Luke Mangney; Joseph Martin; Wade Matern; Byron McConnell; Maya McHale; Giulia McIsaac; Carolanne McLennan; Stephanie Milbrodt; Mohammed Mohammed; Morgan Mooney-McCarthy; Laura Morgan; Clare Mullin; Sarah Needles; Kayla Nunes; Fiona O'Keeffe; Olivia O'Keeffe; Geoffrey Osgood; Jessica Padilla; Sabina Padilla; Isabella Palacio; Verio Panelli; Kendal Paulson; Jace Pearson; Tate Perez; Brenda Phrakonekham; Iason Pitsillides; Alex Preisler; Nicholas Preisler; Hailey Ramirez; Sylvan Ransom; Camille Renaud; Tracy Rocha; Haley Saris; Ryan Schemrich; Lyla Schoenig; Sophia Sears; Anand Sharma; Jessica Siu; Maddie Spangler; Shaili Standefer; Kelly Strickland; Makaila Stritzel; Emily Talbert; Sage Taylor; Emma Thomsen; Katrina Toups; Kyle Tran; Hong Tran; Maraia Tuqiri; Sara Valdes; George VanVorhis; Sandy Vue; Shauna Wallace; Johnna Whipple; Paja Yang; Meg Ye; David Yo; Yichao Zeng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Predictability of Biotic Stress Structures Plant Defence Evolution.

Authors:  Daan Mertens; Karina Boege; André Kessler; Julia Koricheva; Jennifer S Thaler; Noah K Whiteman; Erik H Poelman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Eastern monarch larval performance may not be affected by shifts in phenological synchrony with milkweed.

Authors:  Sydney M Gilmour; Heather M Kharouba
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.