Jessica L Faulkner1, Eric J Belin de Chantemèle2. 1. Vascular Biology Center, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1460 Laney Walker Blvd., Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. 2. Vascular Biology Center, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1460 Laney Walker Blvd., Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. ebelindechanteme@augusta.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the latest reports of the contributions of the endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor to endothelial dysfunction and hypertension to begin to determine the clinical potential for this pathway for hypertension treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor expression is sex-specifically increased in female mice and humans compared with males. Moreover, the expression of endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors is increased by endothelial progesterone receptor activation and naturally occurring fluctuations in progesterone levels (estrous, pregnancy) predict endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor expression levels in female mice. These data follow many previous reports that have indicated that endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor deletion is protective in the development of obesity- and diabetes-associated endothelial dysfunction in female mouse models. These studies have more recently been followed up by reports indicating that both intact endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor and progesterone receptor expression are required for obesity-associated, leptin-mediated endothelial dysfunction in female mice. In addition, the intra-endothelial signaling pathway for endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors to induce dysfunction requires the intact expression of α-epithelial sodium channels (αENaC) in endothelial cells in females. Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors are sex-specifically upregulated in the vasculature of females, a sex difference which is driven by endothelial progesterone receptor activation, and increased activity of these endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors is a crucial mediator of endothelial dysfunction, and potentially hypertension, in obese female experimental models.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the latest reports of the contributions of the endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor to endothelial dysfunction and hypertension to begin to determine the clinical potential for this pathway for hypertension treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor expression is sex-specifically increased in female mice and humans compared with males. Moreover, the expression of endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors is increased by endothelial progesterone receptor activation and naturally occurring fluctuations in progesterone levels (estrous, pregnancy) predict endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor expression levels in female mice. These data follow many previous reports that have indicated that endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor deletion is protective in the development of obesity- and diabetes-associated endothelial dysfunction in female mouse models. These studies have more recently been followed up by reports indicating that both intact endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor and progesterone receptor expression are required for obesity-associated, leptin-mediated endothelial dysfunction in female mice. In addition, the intra-endothelial signaling pathway for endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors to induce dysfunction requires the intact expression of α-epithelial sodium channels (αENaC) in endothelial cells in females. Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors are sex-specifically upregulated in the vasculature of females, a sex difference which is driven by endothelial progesterone receptor activation, and increased activity of these endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors is a crucial mediator of endothelial dysfunction, and potentially hypertension, in obese female experimental models.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endothelial MR; Endothelial dysfunction; Hypertension; Obesity; Progesterone; Sex differences
Authors: Seung Kyum Kim; Amy T McCurley; Jennifer J DuPont; Mark Aronovitz; M Elizabeth Moss; Isaac E Stillman; S Ananth Karumanchi; Demetra D Christou; Iris Z Jaffe Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: John S Clemmer; Jessica L Faulkner; Alex J Mullen; Kenneth R Butler; Robert L Hester Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Tisha M Suboc; Kodlipet Dharmashankar; Jingli Wang; Rong Ying; Allison Couillard; Michael J Tanner; Michael E Widlansky Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2013-08-01
Authors: Carolina Caniffi; Flavia M Cerniello; María N Gobetto; María L Sueiro; María A Costa; Cristina Arranz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana P Davel; Qing Lu; M Elizabeth Moss; Sitara Rao; Imran J Anwar; Jennifer J DuPont; Iris Z Jaffe Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Melis Sahinoz; Fernando Elijovich; Lale A Ertuglu; Jeanne Ishimwe; Ashley Pitzer; Mohammad Saleem; Naome Mwesigwa; Thomas R Kleyman; Cheryl L Laffer; Annet Kirabo Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 8.401