Literature DB >> 31485749

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Hidetoshi Katsuno1, Tsunekazu Hanai2, Koji Masumori2, Yoshikazu Koide2, Hiroshi Matsuoka2, Yosuke Tajima2, Tomoyoshi Endo2, Masahiro Mizuno2, Yongchol Chong2, Kotaro Maeda3, Ichiro Uyama2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery with or without lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer at Fujita Health University Hospital, Aichi, Japan, during a self-pay period.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 115 consecutive patients who underwent robotic surgery for rectal cancer between September 2009 and March 2018, with a median follow-up period of 48 months. Total mesorectal excision was completed by two certified surgeons using a da Vinci S, Si, or Xi Surgical System with an entirely robotic single-docking technique. The surgical and pathological outcomes, morbidity, and oncological results were examined.
RESULTS: Lateral lymph node dissection was performed in 26 patients (22.6%). Neither conversion to open surgery nor perioperative blood transfusion occurred. Ten patients (8.7%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade III postoperative complications. Pathologically, both the distal and radial margins were negative in all cases. The 5-year relapse-free survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 93.5%, 100%, 83.8%, and not reached, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in the period before coverage by the health insurance system, robotic surgery for rectal cancer performed by experienced surgeons was safe and technically feasible, with favorable perioperative results and long-term oncological outcomes, including rates of the relapse-free survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31485749     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01874-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  31 in total

1.  Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Mori; Taizo Kimura; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  Comment on "Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Evidence-based Approach".

Authors:  Constantinos Simillis; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach-report of a single-center experience.

Authors:  Heiko Aselmann; Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Alexander Bernsmeier; Jan Henrik Beckmann; Thorben Möller; Jan Hendrik Egberts; Clemens Schafmayer; Christoph Röcken; Thomas Becker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Dominic C C Foo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prognostic significance of lateral lymph node dissection in node positive low rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Harunobu Sato; Koutarou Maeda; Morito Maruta
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sameer Memon; Alexander G Heriot; Declan G Murphy; Mathias Bressel; A Craig Lynch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Kevin Sng; Byung Eun Yoo; Jae Won Shin; Dong Won Lee; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; Fernando de la Portilla de Juan; Emilio Prendes-Sillero; Hisnard Cadet Dussort; Javier Padillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Megan E Branda; Daniel J Sargent; Anne Marie Boller; Virgilio V George; Maher A Abbas; Walter R Peters; Dipen C Maun; George J Chang; Alan Herline; Alessandro Fichera; Matthew G Mutch; Steven D Wexner; Mark H Whiteford; John Marks; Elisa Birnbaum; David A Margolin; David W Larson; Peter W Marcello; Mitchell C Posner; Thomas E Read; John R T Monson; Sherry M Wren; Peter W T Pisters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Authors:  F Polat; L H Willems; K Dogan; C Rosman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with side-to-end anastomosis in a patient with anal stenosis.

Authors:  Yosuke Tajima; Tsunekazu Hanai; Hidetoshi Katsuno; Koji Masumori; Yoshikazu Koide; Keigo Ashida; Hiroshi Matsuoka; Junichiro Hiro; Tomoyoshi Endo; Tadahiro Kamiya; Yongchol Chong; Kotaro Maeda; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Po-Li Wei; Chien-Chih Chen; Li-Jen Kuo; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.