Literature DB >> 31485637

Expression of TIGIT/CD155 and correlations with clinical pathological features in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Xiangguo Duan1, Juanxi Liu1, Jianjian Cui2, Bin Ma3, Qiunan Zhou1, Xiaojuan Yang1, Zhenhui Lu4, Yong Du4, Chunxia Su5.   

Abstract

T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a recently identified T cell coinhibitory receptor. Studies have shown that TIGIT is expressed in colon adenocarcinoma, uterine corpus endometrioid carcinoma, breast carcinoma and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. However, the role of the TIGIT/human poliovirus receptor (CD155) pathway in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains to be elucidated. In the present study, the expression of TIGIT and CD155 in HCC tissues and peripheral blood were determined, and correlations among TIGIT, CD155, TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells, TIGIT+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and α‑fetoprotein (AFP) were investigated in order to identify a potential target for diagnosing and treating HCC. Immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR analysis and western blotting were used to examine the expression of TIGIT and CD155 in cancerous tissues and peripheral blood collected from patients with HCC. The frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells and TIGIT+ Treg cells and the concentration of inflammatory cytokines secreted by T cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry and a Merck Milliplex assay. Correlations between the frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T and TIGIT+ Treg cells and AFP were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation test. With the degree of cancerous differentiation from high to low, the expression levels of TIGIT and CD155 were upregulated in the cancerous tissues from patients with HCC. TIGIT+ CD4+ T cell and TIGIT+ Treg cell frequencies were decreased in peripheral blood from postoperative patients with HCC. The increased expression of TIGIT was positively correlated with the level of AFP. These results indicate that co‑inhibitory receptor TIGIT may be involved in the pathogenesis of HCC and represent a novel target for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31485637      PMCID: PMC6755146          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor that is harmful to human health. HCC ranks fifth highest in incidence and second in cancer-related mortality worldwide, with >50% of HCC cases occurring in China (1,2). Approximately 75% of HCC cases are caused by chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus (3,4). There are almost 1,400,000 cases of chronic liver disease-associated mortality annually (5), and HCC is the predominant cause of mortality in patients with cirrhosis (6). When diagnosed early, the prognosis of HCC is good, with a 5-year survival rate of >70%; however, the prognosis of HCC is poor when diagnosed late, with a 5-year survival rate of <16% (5). As HCC is highly resistant to chemotherapy, immune therapy is an attractive treatment option, as the inflammatory tumor microenvironment is associated with improved survival (7,8). Previous studies have shown that the aggregation of activated regulatory T (Treg) cells in the tumor microenvironment is one of the inhibitory mechanisms leading to immune evasion of HCC (9–11). However, inhibitory receptors on immune cells may contribute to the suppression of antitumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment. A novel inhibitory receptor, T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), has been shown to be expressed on active T cells, natural killer cells (NK cells) (7) and tumor cells, including gastric cancer cells (8). Human poliovirus receptor, CD155, is the physical ligand of TIGIT. TIGIT/CD155 engagement can inhibit T cell responses in a cell-intrinsic manner by directly targeting the T cell receptor (TCR) signaling cascade and inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) (9–11). Treg cells selectively inhibit proinflammatory T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 17 (Th17) cell responses, also via expression of coinhibitory molecule TIGIT (12,13). Treg cells are important for maintaining immune homeostasis and exerting immunosuppressive effects by directly recognizing tumor cells and releasing the anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-10 (IL-10), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and interleukin-35 (IL-35) (14). Previous studies have shown that the frequency of Treg cells in tumor tissue is closely associated with the recovery of patients. In patients with HCC, an increase in the frequency of Treg cells indicates a poor prognosis (15). Furthermore, TIGIT-expressing T follicular helper cells provide support to B cell functions (16). Previous studies have shown that genetic ablation or antibody blockade of TIGIT enhances CD4+ T cell priming and exacerbates the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalitis and rheumatoid arthritis (17–19). In addition, the TIGIT pathway has been shown to serve an important role in regulation in other disease models, including cancer and chronic viral infection (20). However, the role of TIGIT in the pathogenesis of HCC remains to be elucidated. In the present study, the expression of TIGIT and its ligand, CD155, were examined in the cancerous tissues of patients with HCC. Correlations between TIGIT+ CD4+ T cell and TIGIT+ Treg cell frequencies and clinical pathological features were also analyzed. The results showed that the TIGIT/CD155 signaling pathway may be a potential target for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The tissues and peripheral blood of patients with HCC were collected in accordance with a protocol approved by the Ethics Committee for the Conduct of Human Research at Ningxia Medical University (Ningxia, China; no. 2015-074). Investigators obtained informed consent prior to enrolling participants in clinical trials. Patients who met the following eligibility criteria were included in the study: i) diagnosis of primary HCC identified by histopathological examination; ii) treatment with radical resection; iii) availability of complete follow-up data; iv) no pre-operative anticancer treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy; v) no history of familial malignancy or other synchronous malignancy; and vi) the patient was alive 3 months after surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) preoperative with acute infectious disease and/or blood system disease and associated complications; ii) preoperative with severe hypersplenism, kidney disease, cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease, or autoimmune disease; iii) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, such as radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, prior to surgery; and iv) a history of steroid hormone administration in the 15 days before surgery.

HCC tissue samples and peripheral blood

A total of 77 patients with HCC (40 with liver cirrhosis and 37 with chronic hepatitis) were enrolled in the present study. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on samples from 120 patients, including the aforementioned 77 patients, which comprised 73 cancer tissue samples and 47 adjacent tissue samples (from paracellular tissues that were >5 cm from the tumor), who had undergone surgical resection at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between September 2014 and January 2017. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table I. Venous blood was obtained from 31 patients with HCC (age, 29–80 years; male: female, 17:14) and 30 healthy controls (age, 30–55 years; male: female, 18:12).
Table I.

Clinicopathologic features of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Variablen
Virus infection
  Hepatitis B virus42
  Hepatitis C virus  4
  Hepatitis B (+) and C virus  3
Liver histopathology
  Liver cirrhosis40
  Chronic hepatitis34
Pathological staging
  Highly differentiated group  7
  High and medium differentiation group  6
  Medium differentiation group40
  Medium and low differentiation group11
  Low differentiation group  9
Size of cancer tissue (mm)
  <5045
  >5028
  α-fetoprotein >25 µg/l44

Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Peripheral blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers. The blood was diluted 1:1 with phosphate-buffered saline prior to the separation of PBMCs by centrifugation at 500 × g at room temperature by Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation. The cells were cryopreserved in fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham MA, USA), supplemented with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Flow cytometric analysis

Isolated PBMCs were washed with PBS and centrifuged for 5 min at 500 g. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were resuspended in PBS to a cell density of 1×106 cells/100 µl. Cell surface staining was performed on PBMCs using the following anti-human monoclonal antibodies: CD127-AF647 (1:100; clone HIL-7R-M21, cat. no. 558598), CD4-v450 (1:500; clone RPA-T4, cat. no. 560346), CD25-APC-cy7 (1:100; clone M-A251, cat. no. 561782) and TIGIT-PE (1:300; clone 1G9, cat. no. 565168). All antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen™. All data were collected on a FACS Aria III™ (BD Biosciences) and were analyzed with Flow Jo software version 7.5 (Tree Star, Inc.).

Liquid chip technology

The levels of cytokines in the plasma and supernatants were determined using a cytometry bead array flex set (BD Biosciences) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The assays were conducted for granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-21, IL-10, IL-23, IL-15, IL-2IL-17A, IL-33 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α using 50 µl of sample and a 10-point standard curve (0–2,500 pg/ml) for each cytokine. The samples were analyzed using a flow fluorescence detector Luminex 200 (Luminex Corporation). All data were collected analyzed using Milliplex Analyst. V5.1 (Merck KGaA).

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol total RNA isolation reagent (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), and reverse transcription was performed with the RT-PCR synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was stored at −20°C. PCR amplification for quantification was performed with specific primers using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) on the PikoReal 96 qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using the following thermocycling conditions: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 45 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The average of three independent analyses for each gene and sample was calculated and normalized to the endogenous reference control gene, β-actin. All samples were analyzed using the 2−∆∆Cq analysis method (21). The primers used for qPCR were as follows: β-actin, forward 5′-GCCAACACAGTGCTGTCTGG-3′ and reverse 5′-CTCAGGAGGAGCAATGATCTTG-3′; CD4, forward 5′-AGGAAGTGAACCTGGTGGTG-3′ and reverse 5′-TTGCCTCCTTGTTCTCCAGT-3′; TIGIT, forward 5′-ATGGGACGTACACTGGGAGA-3′ and reverse 5′-ACTGTCGTGCAGATGACCAC-3′; CD155, forward 5′-ACTGTCACCAGCCTCTGGAT-3′ and reverse 5′-GGTGAGGTTCACAGTCAGCA-3′.

Western blot analysis

The tissue total protein was extracted using RIPA buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), and the quantity of protein was measured using an Enhanced BCA Protein Assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology,). A total of 50 µg of protein was loaded and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The total protein was then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The PVDF membranes were blocked using 5% skim milk powder and were then incubated with antibodies overnight at 4°C. Rabbit CD155 monoclonal antibody (cat. no. ab103630; Abcam) and rabbit TIGIT monoclonal antibody (cat. no. ab106311; Abcam) were diluted in antibody diluent (1:500/1:1,000, respectively; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and rabbit GAPDH antibody (cat. no. bs-2188R; BIOSS, Beijing, China) was diluted in antibody diluent (1:4,000). The PVDF membranes were washed four times (5 min each time) with TBST and then incubated with goat anti-mouse or rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:4,000; cat. nos. A21010 and A21020; Abbkine Scientific Co., Ltd.) for 1 h at room temperature. The PVDF membranes were washed another four times, and the protein bands were visualized by ECL chemiluminescence and then measured using ImageJ software 1.8.0. (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The expression levels of proteins of interest were normalized with GAPDH. Independent experiments were repeated three times for each sample.

Immunohistochemistry

The tissues were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. The sections were dewaxed in xylene and dehydrated in alcohol. Antigen retrieval was performed by incubating the slides in citric acid buffer for 10 min. Following blocking with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min and 5% bovine serum albumin (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), the slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse polyclonal antibodies against CD4 (1:100; cat. no. ab133616; Abcam), CD155 (1:100; cat. no. ab103630; Abcam) and TIGIT (1:100; cat. no. ab243903; Abcam). Following rinsing with PBS, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies from the Polink-2 plus Polymer HRP Detection System (cat. nos. ZB-2301 and ZB-2305; ZSGB-BIO) for 30 min at room temperature. The expression of CD4, CD155 and TIGIT was visualized by diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution (Cowin Bioscience) staining. The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin for 5 min. All slides were observed and images were captured under a fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analysis

All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS 23.0 software (IBM Corp.). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's rank correlation test for nonparametric data was used to analyze the relationship between the two factors. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of TIGIT/CD155 in cancerous tissue is significantly elevated in patients with HCC

To determine whether TIGIT/CD155 is involved in the pathogenesis of HCC, the expression of TIGIT/CD155 in paracancerous and cancerous tissues was assessed by immunohistochemistry. A previous study showed that TIGIT was expressed on CD4+ T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (20) and on CD8+ T cells in both healthy individuals and in patients with melanoma (22,23). In order to further understand the aggregation of inflammation in tumor sites, the expression of CD4+ T cells was also examined in patients with HCC. As shown in Fig. 1A and B, the expression of CD4 was distinctly elevated in the liver tumor tissues compared with that in the paracancerous tissues. In the cancerous tissue, as the degree of malignancy increased, the number of CD4+ cells gradually increased, indicating that the interaction between the tumor cells and effector cells determines disease prognosis. The expression levels of TIGIT and CD155 were increased in liver cancer tissues. Of note, the expression of TIGIT gradually increased in liver cancer tissues as the degree of tumor cell differentiation changed from high to low, although the expression of CD155 was highest in the high-medium differentiation stage; generally, the expression of CD155 gradually decreased as differentiation increased (Fig. 1C-F). The molecular mRNA expression levels of TIGIT and CD155 were detected by RT-qPCR analysis. The results showed that the mRNA expression levels of CD4, TIGIT and CD155 were higher in cancerous tissues than those in the paracancerous tissues (Fig. 1G). This suggests that the TIGIT/CD155 pathway may be involved in the pathogenesis of HCC.
Figure 1.

Expression of CD4, TIGIT and CD155 in HCC tissues at different pathological stages and adjacent tissues. Paracancerous tissues (G1) and HCC tissues (G2-6) were stained by immunohistochemistry (×400 magnification). (A) Staining of CD4 and (B) statistical analysis of CD4-positive dots in paracancerous and HCC tissues. (C) Staining of TIGIT and (D) statistical analysis of TIGIT-positive dots in paracancerous and HCC tissues. (E) Staining of CD155 and (F) statistical analysis of CD155-positive dots in paracancerous and HCC tissues. (G) Relative mRNA expression levels of CD4, TIGIT and CD155. All data from at least three independent experiments were measured by the band density, which were normalized to GAPDH. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) and representative images are shown. *P<0.05. G1, paracancerous tissue; G2, highly differentiated group; G3, high and medium differentiation; G4, medium differentiation; G5, medium and low differentiation; G6, low differentiation. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TIGIT, T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain.

Expression of TIGIT and CD155 in different patients with HCC

In order to confirm the roles of TIGIT and CD155 in HCC, the protein expression levels of TIGIT and CD155 were examined via western blotting in cancerous and adjacent tissues from different patients. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, the expression levels of TIGIT and CD155 in the cancerous tissues were higher than those in the paracancerous tissues.
Figure 2.

Expression of TIGIT and CD155 in different patients with HCC. (A) Protein expression of TIGIT was detected by western blotting. (B) Protein expression of CD155 was detected by western blotting. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (*P<0.05 vs. tumor). 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 refer to patients 1, 2, 3,4 and 5, respectively. T, tumor tissue; A, adjacent tissue; TIGIT, T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain.

TIGIT+ CD4+ T cell and TIGIT+ Treg cell frequency shift in patients with HCC

It is well known that TIGIT is expressed on activated T cells, including CD4+ T and Treg cells. In the present study, the frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T and TIGIT+ Treg cells was altered in patients with HCC. PBMCs were extracted from the peripheral blood 5 days before surgery and 5 days after surgery for flow cytometry. The gated strategy of flow cytometry is shown in Fig. 3A. The frequency of CD4 cells in patients with HCC was higher than that in the normal control group and decreased following surgery (Fig. 3B). The frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells was increased in patients with HCC following surgery (Fig. 3B). Another important finding was that the frequency of TIGIT+ Treg cells was higher in patients with HCC than that in the normal control group and was decreased following surgery (Fig. 3B). The secretion of cytokines from different T cell subpopulations was then analyzed. The results showed that the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-17a was increased (P=0.047; Fig. 3C), the expression of IL-6 was increased (P=0.043; Fig. 3C), and the expression of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 was decreased (P=0.034; Fig. 3D) following surgery. These results indicate that the frequency and functional changes of TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells and TIGIT+ Treg cells are involved in the pathogenesis of HCC. In addition, when the balance between subsets of T cells was disrupted, the functional changes of T cell subsets mediated the regulation of tumor development.
Figure 3.

Changes in TIGIT+ CD4+ T cell and TIGIT+ Treg cell numbers. TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells and TIGIT+ Treg cells from normal control (n=30) and HCC (n=31) groups were examined by flow cytometry. (A) Images shows the gating strategy for peripheral blood mononuclear cells by flow cytometry. (B) Frequencies of CD4+ T cells, TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells, Treg cells and TIGIT+ Treg cells in HCC peripheral blood (pre- and post-surgery) and healthy volunteers. (C) Changes in pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations pre-and post-surgery. (D) Changes in anti-inflammatory cytokine concentrations pre- and post-surgery. The data indicate the mean ± SD. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; TIGIT, T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain; granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Correlation between TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells and TIGIT+ Treg cell frequency and AFP

AFP is the most common clinical index used in the diagnosis of liver cancer. Therefore, a possible correlation between the expression of TIGIT+ CD4+ T and TIGIT+ Treg cells and the clinical indicator, AFP, was examined. The results showed that the frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4A) and TIGIT+ Treg cells (Fig. 4B) in the peripheral blood correlated positively with AFP, which may contribute to an early diagnosis of HCC.
Figure 4.

Correlation between TIGIT+ CD4+ T and TIGIT+ Treg cell frequency and AFP. (A) Correlation between the expression of TIGIT on CD4+ T cells and AFP from patients with HCC. (B) Correlation between the frequency of TIGIT+ Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and AFP from patients with HCC. TIGIT, T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Discussion

The incidence of HCC has been increasing, which is a concern due to HCC being a disease with a high mortality rate (24). Liver cancer is one example of an inflammation-related type of cancer and >90% of cases of liver cancer are caused by liver damage and infection (25), which contributes to the formation, progression, escape, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of tumor cells. Among inflammatory aspects, the activation of nuclear transcription factor (NF)-κB contributes to inflammation-induced tumors. In addition, tumor suppressor genes with specific mutations or abnormal expression can activate NF-κB and increase the possibility of immune evasion, which can promote the development of HCC (26). Therefore, the liver remains in an inflammatory environment for a long period of time, causing necrosis that develops into cirrhosis and eventually leads to liver cancer (27). At present, there is no optimal diagnostic test or therapy for liver cancer. Therefore, identifying novel methods to diagnose and treat liver cancer is vital. The co-inhibitory receptor pathway has attracted widespread attention as a potential target of immune regulation. Significant success has been achieved with the use of co-inhibitory receptor pathways, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), in the treatment of cancer (28–30). TIGIT is a recently identified co-inhibitory receptor that is expressed on activated T cells, Treg cells, NK cells and tumor cells (8,11,19,31). Similar to CTLA-4 and CD28, TIGIT competes with its costimulatory counterpart, CD226, for the same ligands (CD155 and CD112) and mediates immune suppression in tumors and chronic infections (32). In the present study, as the degree of malignancy increased in cancerous tissues, the number of CD4+ cells gradually increased, indicating that the interaction between tumor cells and immune cells determines the prognosis of HCC. Previous studies have shown that HCC can evade host immune surveillance and has the ability of self-protection (33,34). In addition, HCC cells avoid immune attack through the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, abnormal expression of antigens and changes to the local immune microenvironment (34). Evidence has also demonstrated that immunosuppressive factors expressed by tumor cells, which inhibit APC or T cell function, suppress antigen presentation and immune response and facilitate the immune evasion of tumor cells (35,36). A number of studies have also found that the overexpression of TIGIT reduces the function of CD4+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (20). The expression of TIGIT on CD4+ T cells was found to be significantly increased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and correlated with the activity of the disease (37). CD155/TIGIT signaling has also been found to regulate CD8+ T cell metabolism and promote tumor progression in human gastric cancer (8). A noteworthy finding in the present study was that TIGIT and its ligand CD155 were upregulated in cancerous tissues from patients with HCC as the degree of cancerous differentiation reduced, suggesting that the TIGIT/CD155 pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of HCC. Other co-inhibitory receptors have also been reported, such as PD-1 marking dysfunctional regulatory T cells in malignant gliomas (38). These results suggest that the TIGIT/CD155 pathway serves an important role in HCC. As is well known, the tumor immune microenvironment is produced by the interaction among tumor cells, immune cells and the tumor stroma. In addition to effector T cells, the existence of Treg cells, which negatively regulate immune responses, inhibits effector T cells. The expression of TIGIT on CD4+ T and Treg cells was detected by flow cytometry in peripheral blood from patients with HCC prior to and following surgery. The frequency of TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells increased prior to surgery, and the frequency of TIGIT+ Treg cells decreased following surgery, compared with the frequency in healthy controls. This indicates that these cells may be involved in tumor immune evasion and that the expression of TIGIT affects the functions of CD4+ effector cells and Treg cells, which mediates HCC immune evasion. The immune environment in the body is disordered, and the balance of cytokines secreted by immune effector cells alters with the development of HCC tumors. In the present study, the levels of IL-17a and IL-6 in patients with HCC increased following surgery, indicating that antitumor immunity was reversed following surgery and that immune defense in the body was restored. IL-10 is one of the immunosuppressive cytokines secreted by Treg cells to suppress the immune response. The decreased level of IL-10 in patients postoperatively suggests that the immune response had recovered. AFP is the most common tumor marker for the diagnosis of primary liver cancer. The positive rate and specificity of AFP in liver cancer is ~70%. In the present study, TIGIT+ CD4+ T and TIGIT+ Treg were positively correlated with AFP, suggesting that TIGIT+ T cells are of potential clinical value in the diagnosis of HCC. Further investigations based on medical evidence are required to examine this application. Taken together, the human immune system is disordered in liver cancer. The number and function of immune cells are altered due to the high expression of TIGIT, particularly on effector T cells and Treg cells, which serve important roles in the tumor microenvironment. The interaction between TIGIT+ tumor cells and TIGIT+ T cells appears to determine the severity and prognosis of HCC. In addition, the expression of TIGIT on CD4+ T and Treg cells was positively correlated with AFP and may be a potential indicator for HCC detection. Therefore, the expression of TIGIT may serve as a key molecule for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC in the future.
  38 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Noa Stanietsky; Hrvoje Simic; Jurica Arapovic; Amir Toporik; Ofer Levy; Amit Novik; Zurit Levine; Meirav Beiman; Liat Dassa; Hagit Achdout; Noam Stern-Ginossar; Pinhas Tsukerman; Stipan Jonjic; Ofer Mandelboim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; K Lenhard Rudolph
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in USA.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.288

6.  Chronic inflammation associated with hepatitis C virus infection perturbs hepatic transforming growth factor beta signaling, promoting cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Koichi Matsuzaki; Miki Murata; Katsunori Yoshida; Go Sekimoto; Yoshiko Uemura; Noriko Sakaida; Masaki Kaibori; Yasuo Kamiyama; Mikio Nishizawa; Junichi Fujisawa; Kazuichi Okazaki; Toshihito Seki
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 7.  Microanatomy of the liver immune system.

Authors:  Eszter Nemeth; Alan W Baird; Cliona O'Farrelly
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 8.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Roberto Mazzanti; Laura Gramantieri; Luigi Bolondi
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2007-10-24

9.  The surface protein TIGIT suppresses T cell activation by promoting the generation of mature immunoregulatory dendritic cells.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Kristin Harden; Lino C Gonzalez; Michelle Francesco; Eugene Chiang; Bryan Irving; Irene Tom; Sinisa Ivelja; Canio J Refino; Hilary Clark; Dan Eaton; Jane L Grogan
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  A novel molecular interaction for the adhesion of follicular CD4 T cells to follicular DC.

Authors:  Kent S Boles; William Vermi; Fabio Facchetti; Anja Fuchs; Timothy J Wilson; Thomas G Diacovo; Marina Cella; Marco Colonna
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Immune suppressive checkpoint interactions in the tumour microenvironment of primary liver cancers.

Authors:  Guoying Zhou; Patrick P C Boor; Marco J Bruno; Dave Sprengers; Jaap Kwekkeboom
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 2.  New insights into checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and its combined therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: from mechanisms to clinical trials.

Authors:  Haoer Jin; Sha Qin; Jiang He; Juxiong Xiao; Qingling Li; Yitao Mao; Luqing Zhao
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 10.750

Review 3.  Fine-Tuning the Tumour Microenvironment: Current Perspectives on the Mechanisms of Tumour Immunosuppression.

Authors:  Jesse D Armitage; Hannah V Newnes; Alison McDonnell; Anthony Bosco; Jason Waithman
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Hitting the complexity of the TIGIT-CD96-CD112R-CD226 axis for next-generation cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hyung-Seung Jin; Yoon Park
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 5.  TIGIT/CD226 Axis Regulates Anti-Tumor Immunity.

Authors:  Jinah Yeo; Minkyung Ko; Dong-Hee Lee; Yoon Park; Hyung-Seung Jin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-28

6.  A novel scoring system for TIGIT expression in classic Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Ombretta Annibali; Antonella Bianchi; Alba Grifoni; Valeria Tomarchio; Mariantonietta Tafuri; Martina Verri; Giuseppe Avvisati; Anna Crescenzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  TIGIT-CD226-PVR axis: advancing immune checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chiang; Ira Mellman
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Prognostic Role of TIGIT Expression in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kunmin Xiao; Kunlin Xiao; Kexin Li; Peng Xue; Shijie Zhu
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 9.  Immunmodulatory Treatment Strategies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Checkpoint Inhibitors Now to an Integrated Approach in the Future.

Authors:  Matthias Ocker; Christian Mayr; Tobias Kiesslich; Sebastian Stintzing; Daniel Neureiter
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Prognostic value of CD155/TIGIT expression in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daisuke Murakami; Kenji Matsuda; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yasuyuki Mitani; Yuki Mizumoto; Yuki Nakamura; Ibu Matsuzaki; Ryuta Iwamoto; Yuichi Takahashi; Fumiyoshi Kojima; Shin-Ichi Murata; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.