| Literature DB >> 31485374 |
Shun-Jen Yu1, Yi-Hao Lee2, Ching-Ping Lin1, Aaron Yu-Jen Wu3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the maxillary sinus anatomy over edentulous ridges in the bilateral posterior maxillary area in Taiwanese patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Entities:
Keywords: Asians; Cone-beam computed tomography; Edentulous jaw; Maxillary sinus; Sinus floor augmentation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31485374 PMCID: PMC6713807 DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.4.237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Periodontal Implant Sci ISSN: 2093-2278 Impact factor: 2.614
Figure 1Images were studied in different views. Slices were first oriented at the midcrest of the edentulous area.
Figure 2In areas missing multiple teeth, the residual ridge height was measured from the crest of the alveolar ridge to the sinus floor at the planned site of the dental implant. The measurement point was 5 mm away from the neighboring tooth and 8 mm away from the first point of the next implant site.
Figure 3A horizontal line was drawn at the reference point, which was 2-mm coronal to the edentulous crest and was used to measure ridge width.
Figure 4A perpendicular line was drawn from the horizontal plane, and measurements were taken at 3- and 10-mm coronal to the sinus floor to measure the thickness of the lateral wall.
Ridge width
| Tooth | Mean±SD (mm) | Range (mm) | No. (<6 mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First premolar | 8.53±1.20 | 6.74–9.70 | 0 | |
| Second premolar | 8.30±2.99 | 4.34–16.81 | 6 | |
| First molar | 10.31±2.81 | 6.17–19.07 | 0 | |
| Second molar | 12.37±2.83 | 7.02–16.21 | 0 | |
| Total | 10.26±3.16 | 4.34–19.07 | 6 (5.94%) |
The average ridge width was 10.26 mm and the measurements revealed a significantly greater ridge width in the second molar region than in the premolar and first molar regions.
SD: standard deviation.
a)P<0.05, b)P<0.005.
Residual ridge height
| Tooth | Mean±SD (mm) | Range (mm) | No. (<10 mm) | No. (<5 mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First premolar | 10.26±4.72 | 3.28–16.23 | 2 | 1 | |
| Second premolar | 11.11±3.57 | 5.45–22.79 | 10 | 0 | |
| First molar | 7.78±4.17 | 1.58–17.03 | 28 | 14 | |
| Second molar | 7.00±3.18 | 2.16–13.75 | 23 | 9 | |
| Total | 8.55±4.09 | 1.58–22.79 | 63 (62.3%) | 23 (22.7%) |
The mean residual ridge height was 8.55 mm and the measurements revealed a significantly lower ridge height in the molar region than in the second premolar region.
SD: standard deviation.
a)P<0.05, b)P<0.005.
Distance from the crest to the PSAA and diameter of the PSAA (n=25, 24.5%)
| Variables | Mean±SD (mm) | Range (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Distance from crest to PSAA | 17.11±4.88 | 6.70–25.77 |
| Diameter of PSAA | 1.22±0.42 | 0.49–2.15 |
The PSAA was observed at 24.5% of the sites in our study. The average distance between the alveolar crest and the PSAA was 17.11 mm and the arterial diameter was 1.22 mm.
PSAA: posterior superior alveolar artery; SD: standard deviation.
Thickness of the lateral wall (mm)
| Tooth | LWT | LWT-3 mm | LWT-10 mm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | Range | ||
| First premolar | 2.08±0.62 | 1.15–3.33 | 2.10±0.82 | 1.15–3.33 | 2.07±0.44 | 1.40–2.61 | |
| Second premolar | 1.97±0.75 | 0.71–3.57 | 2.12±0.72 | 0.83–3.52 | 1.79±0.77 | 0.71–3.57 | |
| First molar | 2.18±1.01 | 0.53–4.54 | 2.15±1.10 | 0.53–4.54 | 2.22±0.89 | 0.93–4.02 | |
| Second molar | 2.03±1.03 | 0.83–4.78 | 2.23±1.03 | 0.83–4.76 | 1.79±1.01 | 0.88–4.78 | |
| Total | 2.08±0.94 | 0.53–4.78 | 2.16±0.98 | 0.53–4.76 | 1.97±0.88 | 0.71–4.78 | |
No significant difference among these 3 positions was observed (P>0.773); however, we observed that the lateral wall thickness increased from the first premolar to the second molar region at 3 mm coronal to the sinus floor region.
LWT: lateral wall thickness; LWT-3 mm: mean lateral wall thickness at 3 mm coronal to the sinus floor; LWT-10 mm: mean lateral wall thickness at 10 mm coronal to the sinus floor; SD: standard deviation.