| Literature DB >> 31485250 |
Jianbo Guo1,2, Xingjiang Xiong1, Yu Cao3, Yukun Ding1,2, Qingyong He1.
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of Yangxue Qingnao (YXQN) granules in the treatment of chronic cerebral circulation insufficiency (CCCI), electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, CNKI, VIP, and Wangfang-were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to January 2019. GRADE and RevMan 5.3.0 were used for grading and analysis, respectively. Fifteen trials involving 1211 CCCI patients were included. Subgroup analysis was performed owing to study heterogeneity. Compared to nimodipine plus routine treatment, YXQN granules plus routine treatment were more effective in increasing basilar artery (BA) blood flow velocity (mean difference (MD) = 3.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [2.31, 4.37], P < 0.00001), vertebral artery (VA) blood flow velocity (MD = 0.52, 95% CI = [0.27, 0.76], P < 0.0001), and internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow velocity (MD = 7.46, 95% CI = [2.01, 12.90], P=0.007). In improving the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for symptoms such as headache, dizziness, and insomnia, YXQN granules plus routine treatment were shown to be superior to the following control treatments: nimodipine plus routine treatment (mean difference (M-H) = 4.21, 95% CI = [2.49, 7.12], P < 0.00001), flunarizine plus routine treatment (mean difference (M-H) = 3.92, 95% CI = [1.36, 11.29], P=0.01), troxerutin plus routine treatment (mean difference (M-H) = 4.79, 95% CI = [2.20, 10.42], P < 0.00001), and routine treatment (mean difference (M-H) = 6.13, 95% CI = [1.48, 25.34], P=0.01). Risk of bias was assessed in 15 trials. One analysis was graded using GRADE and showed poor results. Adverse events were not reported explicitly in all but one trial. Thus, this meta-analysis suggests that YXQN granules may be beneficial for patients with CCCI. However, owing to the poor quality of the clinical trials and small sample sizes, a definite conclusion on the efficacy and safety of YXQN granules cannot be drawn from existing information.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31485250 PMCID: PMC6710749 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8484263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Selection process of this systematic review.
Characteristics of 15 included randomized controlled trials.
| ID | Sample size (T/C) | Mean age (years) | Diagnostic standards | Intervention | Comparison | Course duration (days) | Outcome | Adverse effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhou and Liu [ | 86 (46/40) | T: 46 ± 2 | Chinese diagnosis and treatment of CCCI guidelines (2004) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Flunarizine 5 mg po qn + routine treatment | 28 | Efficacy rate | None |
| Ding and Zhang [ | 102 (54/48) | T: 47 | Chinese diagnosis and treatment of CCCI guidelines (2004) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Flunarizine 5 mg po qn + routine treatment | 28 | Efficacy rate | None |
| He et al. [ | 65 (34/31) | T: 63.30 ± 5.60 | Diagnostic criteria from the Japanese Ministry of Health (1990) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 30 | Efficacy rate, hemorheology (erythrocyte, fibrinogen, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) | None |
| Gu et al. [ | 83 (42/41) | T: 67.20 | Diagnostic criteria from the Japanese Ministry of Health (1990) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 56 | Efficacy rate, TCD (MCA, BA, PCA, VA) | None |
| Wang [ | 87 (44/43) | T: 62 ± 7.50 | Diagnostic criteria from the Japanese Ministry of Health (2007) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 30 | Efficacy rate, TCD (ICA, BA, VA) | NR |
| Chang [ | 52 (26/26) | T: 62.50 ± 4.60 | Diagnostic criteria from the 16th Stroke Society of Japan (2000) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 84 | Efficacy rate, MMSE, ADL | None |
| Li [ | 80 (43/37) | T: 62 ± 6.30 | Chinese diagnosis and treatment of CCCI guidelines (unclear) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 30 | Efficacy rate, TCD (VA, BA was unclear) | NR |
| Shen [ | 102 (52/50) | T: 58 ± 6.80 | Chinese diagnosis and treatment of CCCI guidelines (2007) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Nimodipine tablet 20 mg po tid + routine treatment | 30 | Efficacy rate, TCD (ICA, BA, VA) | |
| Wang [ | 74 (37/37) | T: 54.30 ± 3.20 | Diagnostic criteria from the 16th Stroke Society of Japan (2000) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Routine treatment | 14 | Efficacy rate | NR |
| Zhu et al. [ | 96 (48/48) | NR | Diagnostic criteria from the 16th Stroke Society of Japan (2000) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Routine treatment | 14 | Different efficacy rate, blood flow | T: 5 |
| Li et al. [ | 52 (26/26) | T: 84.60 | Diagnostic criteria for CCCI (unclear) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Routine treatment | 90 | Efficacy rate | None |
| Liang [ | 54 (27/27) | T: 66.40 | Diagnostic criteria for CCCI (unclear) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Troxerutin tablet 0.2 g po tid + routine treatment | 90 | Efficacy rate | NR |
| Jia [ | 90 (45/45) | NR | Diagnostic criteria from the 16th Stroke Society of Japan (2000) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Troxerutin tablet 0.2 g po tid + routine treatment | 90 | Efficacy rate, TCD (MCA, PCA, BA) | None |
| Zhang and Shi [ | 104 (56/48) | T: 56 ± 7 | Diagnostic criteria for CCCI (unclear) | YXQN granules 4 g po tid + routine treatment | Troxerutin tablet 0.2 g po tid + routine treatment | 30 | Efficacy rate, TCD PI and RI (MCA, ACA, PCA), blood fluid | None |
| Bi and Chen [ | 84 (42/42) | NR | Chinese diagnosis and treatment of CCCI guidelines (2002) | YXQN granules 4 mg po tid + routine treatment | Cinnarizine tablet 25 mg tid + routine treatment (specific drug was unclear) | 30 | Efficacy rate, TCD (MCA, VCA, ACA, VA, BA) | None |
Routine treatment included antihypertensive, hypoglycemic, and lipid-lowering treatments, or the specific drug was unclear; NR, not reported; T, treatment group; C, control group; TCD transcranial Doppler ultrasound; VA, vertebral artery; BA, basilar artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; ACA, anterior cerebral artery; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index.
Figure 2Risk-of-bias summary.
Figure 3Risk-of-bias graph.
GRADE summary of five randomized controlled trials comparing YXQN granules plus routine treatment with nimodipine tablets plus routine treatment in chronic cerebellar circulation insufficiency.
| Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects | Relative effect (95% CI) | No. of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assumed risk: nimodipine tablets plus routine treatment | Corresponding risk: YXQN granules plus routine treatment | ||||
| BA blood flow velocity | The mean BA blood flow velocity in the control groups was 45.37 | The mean BA blood flow velocity in the intervention groups was 3.34-fold higher (2.31- to 4.37-fold higher) | — | 272 (3 RCTs) |
|
| VA blood flow velocity | The mean VA blood flow velocity in the control groups was 40.55 | The mean VA blood flow velocity in the intervention groups was 3.21-fold higher (0.62- to 5.8-fold higher) | — | 352 (4 RCTs) |
|
| ICA blood flow velocity | The mean ICA blood flow velocity in the control groups was 50.7 | The mean ICA blood flow velocity in the intervention groups was 7.46-fold higher (2.01- to 12.9-fold higher) | — | 189 (2 RCTs) |
|
| Clinical efficacy of TCM symptoms | 642 per 1000 | 883 per 1,000 (817–927) | RR 4.21 (2.49 to 7.12) | 386 (5 RCTs) |
|
The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: high certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect; moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different; low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect; and very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. aAccording to the risk-of-bias graph. bTotal number of events was less than 300.
Figure 4Forest plot of the comparisons between YXQN granules plus routine treatment and nimodipine tablets plus routine treatment. (a) Comparison for the outcome of the BA blood flow velocity. (b) Comparison for the outcome of the VA blood flow velocity. (c) Comparison for the outcome of the ICA blood flow velocity.
Figure 5Forest plot of subgroup analysis of the clinical efficacy of TCM syndromes.