| Literature DB >> 31484736 |
Shuzhen Deng1,2, Wenda Sun3,2, Lihong Dong3,2, Guobing Cui3,2, Yi Zhen Deng1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Magnaporthe oryzae; MoGt2; pathogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31484736 PMCID: PMC6731526 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00309-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1Phylogenetic tree analysis of Gt2. A neighbor-joining tree of fungal Gt2 orthologs was constructed by the MEGA version 7 program (45), including M. oryzae (MoGt2, MGG_01191), F. graminearium Gt2 (XP_011316405), N. crassa Cps-1 (XP_963800), Botrytis cinerea hypothetical protein (XP_001548088), Z. tritici Gt2 (XP_003857553), Aspergillus fumigatus Cps1 (XP_746682.1), Aspergillus nidulans hypothetical protein (XP_682338), and C. neoformans Cps1 (AAQ92917). The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method (46). The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 1.76055829 is shown. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches (47). The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method (48) and are in units of the number of amino acid differences per site (labeled at the nodes). The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1.2). All positions with less than 50% site coverage were eliminated. The position of MoGt2 in the phylogenetic tree is indicated by gray highlighting. Asterisks denote the fungal Gt2 or Cps1 proteins characterized in pathogenic fungi (11–13). Domain annotation was performed using the SMART website (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). The amino acid residue number of the annotated domains is indicated. TM, transmembrane region; catalytic, glycosyl transferase domain.
FIG 2MoGT2 is necessary for vegetative growth. (A) Colony morphology of the wild-type strain (WT), two mogt2Δ null mutants (mogt2Δ-28 and -39), and the complemented strain (MoGT2-com) grown on CM, MM, or PDA medium at 25°C. Photographs were taken at 10 days postinoculation. The second panel shows mycelial fluff of different strains, formed in liquid CM after growth at 28°C for 2 days. (B) Bar chart showing the colony diameters of the strains grown on CM for 10 days. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments (n ≥ 10). The letters a and b above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). (C) Hyphae of the WT, mogt2Δ-39, and MoGT2-com strains were stained with calcofluor white (18909; Sigma-Aldrich). White arrowheads point to the septa. Size bars = 20 μm.
FIG 3MoGT2 is essential for M. oryzae conidiation and pathogenicity. (A) Microscopic observation of conidial development. Conidiophores were not observed in the mogt2Δ mutants, while the wild type (WT) formed normal conidiophores and conidia. Bars = 100 μm. (B) Expression levels of conidiation-related genes assessed by qRT-PCR. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments, each of which contains three technical replicates. Statistical difference is indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01). (C) Barley or rice explants were inoculated with the mycelial plugs of the strains. Photos were taken 7 days postinoculation. Com, complemented strain; a, intact leaf; b, abraded leaf. (D) Mycelium fragments of the WT or mogt2Δ mutant strains were placed on hydrophobic GelBond film surfaces to induce appressorium-like structure (ALS) formation. No appressorium-like structures were observed at the tip of mogt2Δ hyphae. Size bar = 50 μm.
FIG 4MoGT2 is involved in stress response and hyphal hydrophobicity. (A) Colony morphology of the wild-type strain (WT) and two mogt2Δ mutants under various stressful conditions grown at 25°C. Photographs were taken 10 days postinoculation. (B) Calculated growth reduction rates under different stressful conditions. Growth inhibition rate (%) = [diameter (CM) − diameter (stress)]/diameter (CM). Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments. The letters a, b, and c above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). (C) Droplets of water or detergent solution (0.2% SDS plus 50 mM EDTA) were placed on the surface of the wild-type (WT) or mogt2Δ colonies, respectively. Photographs were taken at 24 h postincubation. (D) Expression levels of hydrophobin-encoding gene MPG1 were assessed in the WT or mogt2Δ strain by qRT-PCR. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments, each of which contains three technical replicates. Statistical difference is indicated by an asterisk (P < 0.01).
FIG 5The DxD and QxxRW domains are required for the full virulence of M. oryzae. (A) Amino acid sequences and positions of the conserved DxD and QxxRW domains in MoGt2 protein. Two conserved domains are highlighted in blue. (B) Functional analysis of the DxD and QxxRW domains. The GT2D156R and GT2D158R mutants showed similar phenotypes to the mogt2Δ mutant; however, the reintroduction of GT2Q301R could partially restore conidiation of the mogt2Δ mutant. (C) Assessment of pathogenicity of the GT2Q301R mutant by infection assay using a conidial suspension inoculated on barley or leaf explants. The inoculum for each droplet was 2,000 conidia. Photos were taken 7 days postinoculation.
FIG 6Identification of MoGt2 target protein(s) or gene(s). (A) Total protein extracts from the wild-type strain (WT) or the mogt2Δ mutant cultured on solid medium and exposed to light for 12 to 16 h for conidiation induction were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with a Pierce glycoprotein staining kit (24562; Thermo Scientific) (upper panel). Coomassie blue staining (lower panel) served as a loading control. The numbers 1 to 5 for the WT samples or 1 to 4 for the mogt2Δ samples indicate the numbers of independent biological repeats. Arrows denote bands 1 and 2, which were present in the WT samples but absent in the mutant samples and selected for MS identification. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs is common in three biological replicates.
List of candidate proteins identified by mass spectrometry analysis
| UniProt ID | Mol wt (kDa) | Annotation | Predicted glycosylation | Gene ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band 1 (100–140 kDa) | ||||
| G4NGG4, L7IDE3, G4NGG3, L7J1X3 | 117–125 | Hypothetical protein (coiled-coil | N376, N1030 | |
| L7JPS1, G4MQ02, L7HNU0 | 99–109 | Aminopeptidase 2 | N17, N47, N550 | |
| L7HZB4, G5EHM8, L7J4A3 | 98 | Nuclease domain-containing | N213, N345, N597 | |
| Band 2 (∼75 kDa) | ||||
| L7HYA2, L7JL82, G4MNH8 | 70 | Hsp70-like protein | N33, N149, N358, N416, N486 | |
| L7JNC6, G4N0Y1, L7I4W2 | 75 | Hypothetical protein (coiled-coil | N268 | |
| L7JAP8, L7HXE1, G4MKA5, A7U5U5 | 71–72 | Glucose-regulated protein/Hsp70 | No prediction | |
| L7JM28, L7I7P6, G4MLM8 | 80 | Hsp80/Hsp90 | N36, N71, N185, N370, N439 |
Prediction performed by NetNGlyc 1.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/).