| Literature DB >> 31483956 |
Hatice Imran Gungordu1, Min Bao2, Sjoerd van Helvert3, John A Jansen1, Sander C G Leeuwenburgh1, X Frank Walboomers1.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are highly sensitive to biomechanics of their extracellular environment. Generally, a higher elasticity of culture substrates can drive cells into the osteogenic lineage, whereas low substrate elasticity results in adipogenesis. Applied mechanical loading by cyclic strain is another major variable influencing cell fate. Yet, little is known about the simultaneous effect of both cues. Therefore, the present study investigated the relative importance of both cues on differentiation. MSCs were cultured in an osteogenic and also an adipogenic environment on soft polyacrylamide (PAAm; E = 23 ± 0.3 kPa), stiff PAAm (111 ± 2 kPa), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS; E = 1,5 ± 0.07 MPa) either unstrained or with 8% cyclic strain at 1 Hz. Without strain, the relative expression of the early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly higher (78%) on PDMS than on both PAAm. With 8% cyclic strain, ALP expression increased for all groups in comparison with unstrained controls. The highest increase was observed for the soft PAAm by 36%. Moreover, relative oil red O (ORO) expression-indicating adipogenesis-was the highest for unstrained soft PAAm. On the other hand, the percentage of ORO positive cells significantly decreased by 57% and 69% for soft and stiff PAAm when strained. In conclusion, biomaterial elasticity and mechanical loading can act simultaneously on cell differentiation. Substrate elasticity is an important factor, regulating the differentiation, but cyclic strain can drive MSCs towards the osteogenesis even on the softest substrate. As such, the osteogenic effect of mechanical loading can overrule the adipogenic effect of soft substrates, thereby acting as an inhibitor.Entities:
Keywords: cyclic strain; extracellular matrix; mechanical loading; mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenic differentiation; substrate elasticity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31483956 DOI: 10.1002/term.2956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med ISSN: 1932-6254 Impact factor: 3.963