Literature DB >> 31483956

Effect of mechanical loading and substrate elasticity on the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Hatice Imran Gungordu1, Min Bao2, Sjoerd van Helvert3, John A Jansen1, Sander C G Leeuwenburgh1, X Frank Walboomers1.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are highly sensitive to biomechanics of their extracellular environment. Generally, a higher elasticity of culture substrates can drive cells into the osteogenic lineage, whereas low substrate elasticity results in adipogenesis. Applied mechanical loading by cyclic strain is another major variable influencing cell fate. Yet, little is known about the simultaneous effect of both cues. Therefore, the present study investigated the relative importance of both cues on differentiation. MSCs were cultured in an osteogenic and also an adipogenic environment on soft polyacrylamide (PAAm; E = 23 ± 0.3 kPa), stiff PAAm (111 ± 2 kPa), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS; E = 1,5 ± 0.07 MPa) either unstrained or with 8% cyclic strain at 1 Hz. Without strain, the relative expression of the early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly higher (78%) on PDMS than on both PAAm. With 8% cyclic strain, ALP expression increased for all groups in comparison with unstrained controls. The highest increase was observed for the soft PAAm by 36%. Moreover, relative oil red O (ORO) expression-indicating adipogenesis-was the highest for unstrained soft PAAm. On the other hand, the percentage of ORO positive cells significantly decreased by 57% and 69% for soft and stiff PAAm when strained. In conclusion, biomaterial elasticity and mechanical loading can act simultaneously on cell differentiation. Substrate elasticity is an important factor, regulating the differentiation, but cyclic strain can drive MSCs towards the osteogenesis even on the softest substrate. As such, the osteogenic effect of mechanical loading can overrule the adipogenic effect of soft substrates, thereby acting as an inhibitor.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclic strain; extracellular matrix; mechanical loading; mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenic differentiation; substrate elasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483956     DOI: 10.1002/term.2956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Integrins in the Regulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation by Mechanical Signals.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Fuwen Zheng; Ruixue Song; Lequan Zhuang; Ming Yang; Jian Suo; Lisha Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  The effect of matrix stiffness on the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yimei Zhou; Jingyi Qiu; Lingyun Wan; Juan Li
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 3.  Tissue Engineering Strategies to Increase Osteochondral Regeneration of Stem Cells; a Close Look at Different Modalities.

Authors:  Hamid Tayefi Nasrabadi; Ali Baradar Khoshfetrat; Reza Rahbarghazi; Sepideh Saghati; Keyvan Moharamzadeh; Ayla Hassani; Seyedeh Momeneh Mohammadi; Sonia Fathi Karkan
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.692

Review 4.  How the mechanical microenvironment of stem cell growth affects their differentiation: a review.

Authors:  Xiaofang Zhang; Sibo Zhang; Tianlu Wang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 8.079

5.  Serum exosomes from young rats improve the reduced osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in aged rats with osteoporosis after fatigue loading in vivo.

Authors:  Jingqiong Xun; Chan Li; Meilu Liu; Yueming Mei; Qiongfei Zhou; Bo Wu; Fen Xie; Yuling Liu; Ruchun Dai
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.832

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.