Literature DB >> 31483750

Application of an innovative high-throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous analysis of 18 hazardous drugs to rule out accidental acute chemotherapy exposures in health care workers.

Pan Shu1, Ting Zhao1, Bo Wen1, Kari Mendelsohn-Victor2, Duxin Sun1, Christopher R Friese2, Manjunath P Pai3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite safe handling guidelines published by several groups, health care worker exposure to hazardous drugs continues to occur due to suboptimal engineering controls and low use of protective equipment. Simple, multi-target and specific analytical methods are needed so that acute exposures to these drugs in the workplace can be assessed rapidly. Our aim was to develop an analytical method for simultaneous detection and quantification of widely used cancer drugs to rule out accidental acute chemotherapy exposures in health care workers.
METHODS: We examined the feasibility of alternate high-performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry methods to simultaneously detect eighteen chemotherapy analytes in plasma and urine. The linear concentration ranges tested during assay development were 0.1-50 ng/mL. After development of a multi-analyte assay protocol, plasma samples (n = 743) from a multi-center cluster-randomized clinical trial (n = 12 sites) of an hazardous drug educational intervention were assayed. Confirmatory assays were performed based on the individual acute-spill case-histories.
RESULTS: An innovative HPLC-multiple reaction monitoring-information dependent acquisition-enhanced production ion (MRM-IDA-EPI) analytical method was developed to simultaneously detect: cytarabine, gemcitabine, dacarbazine, methotrexate, topotecan, mitomycin, pemetrexed, irinotecan, doxorubicin, vincristine, vinblastine, ifosamide, cyclophosphamide, vinorelbine, bendamustine, etoposide, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. The retention times ranged from 4 min to 13 min for the analytical run. The limit of detection (MRM-IDA-EPI) and limit of quantitation (MRM) was 0.25 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively for most analytes. No detectable plasma concentrations were measured at baseline, post-intervention and in cases of documented acute spills. Use of a secondary tandem mass spectrometry approach was able to successfully rule out false positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of a sensitive high-throughput multi-analyte cancer chemotherapy assay is feasible using an MRM-IDA-EPI method. This method can be used to rapidly rule out systemic exposure to accidental acute chemotherapy spills in health care workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antineoplastic drugs; HPLC-MS/MS; biological monitoring; occupational exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483750      PMCID: PMC7054176          DOI: 10.1177/1078155219870591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  30 in total

1.  Sampling and mass spectrometric analytical methods for five antineoplastic drugs in the healthcare environment.

Authors:  Jack R Pretty; Thomas H Connor; Ivan Spasojevic; Kristine S Kurtz; Jeffrey L McLaurin; Clayton B'Hymer; D Gayle Debord
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 2.  Safe handling of hazardous drugs.

Authors:  Martha Polovich
Journal:  Online J Issues Nurs       Date:  2004-09-30

Review 3.  Occupational exposure to anti-cancer drugs: A review of effects of new technology.

Authors:  Nitin Vyas; Dennis Yiannakis; Andrew Turner; Graham J Sewell
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 1.809

4.  Wipe sampling procedure coupled to LC-MS/MS analysis for the simultaneous determination of 10 cytotoxic drugs on different surfaces.

Authors:  Susanne Nussbaumer; Laurent Geiser; Farshid Sadeghipour; Denis Hochstrasser; Pascal Bonnabry; Jean-Luc Veuthey; Sandrine Fleury-Souverain
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve Nurses' Hazardous Drug Handling

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; James Yang; Kari Mendelsohn-Victor; Marjorie McCullagh
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Validation of an HPLC-MS/MS and wipe procedure for mitomycin C contamination.

Authors:  Clayton B'Hymer; Thomas Connor; Derek Stinson; Jack Pretty
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 1.618

Review 7.  A review of surface wipe sampling compared to biologic monitoring for occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  Thomas Kibby
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to 5-fluorouracil: urinary α-fluoro-β-alanine assay by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in health care personnel.

Authors:  S Ndaw; F Denis; P Marsan; A d'Almeida; A Robert
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Highly sensitive LC-MS/MS methods for urinary biological monitoring of occupational exposure to cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate antineoplastic drugs and routine application.

Authors:  Mireille Canal-Raffin; Karim Khennoufa; Béatrice Martinez; Yves Goujon; Celia Folch; Dominique Ducint; Karine Titier; Patrick Brochard; Catherine Verdun-Esquer; Mathieu Molimard
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  Environmental and biological monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in four workplaces in a Swedish hospital.

Authors:  M Hedmer; H Tinnerberg; A Axmon; B A G Jönsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data.

Authors:  Veruscka Leso; Cristina Sottani; Carolina Santocono; Francesco Russo; Elena Grignani; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.