Literature DB >> 31483701

The fatty acid derivative palmitoylcarnitine abrogates colorectal cancer cell survival by depleting glutathione.

Patrick C Turnbull1, Meghan C Hughes1, Christopher G R Perry1.   

Abstract

Previous evidence suggests that palmitoylcarnitine incubations trigger mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in HT29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, yet nontransformed cells appear insensitive. The mechanism by which palmitoylcarnitine induces cancer cell death is unclear. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship between mitochondrial kinetics and glutathione buffering in determining the effect of palmitoylcarnitine on cell survival. HT29 and HCT 116 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, CCD 841 nontransformed colon cells, and MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma cells were exposed to 0 μM, 50 μM, and 100 μM palmitoylcarnitine for 24-48 h. HCT 116 and HT29 cells showed decreased cell survival following palmitoylcarnitine compared with CCD 841 cells. Palmitoylcarnitine stimulated H2O2 emission in HT29 and CCD 841 cells but increased it to a greater level in HT29 cells due largely to a higher basal H2O2 emission. This greater H2O2 emission was associated with lower glutathione buffering capacity and caspase-3 activation in HT29 cells. The glutathione-depleting agent buthionine sulfoximine sensitized CCD 841 cells and further sensitized HT29 cells to palmitoylcarnitine-induced decreases in cell survival. MCF7 cells did not produce H2O2 when exposed to palmitoylcarnitine and were able to maintain glutathione levels. Furthermore, HT29 cells demonstrated the lowest mitochondrial oxidative kinetics vs. CCD 841 and MCF7 cells. The results demonstrate that colorectal cancer is sensitive to palmitoylcarnitine due in part to an inability to prevent oxidative stress through glutathione-redox coupling, thereby rendering the cells sensitive to elevations in H2O2. These findings suggest that the relationship between inherent metabolic capacities and redox regulation is altered early in response to palmitoylcarnitine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Warburg effect; cancer, glutathione; mitochondria; reactive oxygen species

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483701      PMCID: PMC6962523          DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00319.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6143            Impact factor:   4.249


  37 in total

1.  Impairments in left ventricular mitochondrial bioenergetics precede overt cardiac dysfunction and remodelling in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Meghan C Hughes; Sofhia V Ramos; Patrick C Turnbull; Brittany A Edgett; Jason S Huber; Nazari Polidovitch; Uwe Schlattner; Peter H Backx; Jeremy A Simpson; Christopher G R Perry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Studies on the chemopreventive effect of carnitine on tumorigenesis in vivo, using two experimental murine models of colon cancer.

Authors:  Serge Dionne; Ihsan Elimrani; Marie-Josée Roy; Ijaz A Qureshi; Dittakavi R Sarma; Emile Levy; Ernest G Seidman
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 3.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression.

Authors:  Anne Le; Charles R Cooper; Arvin M Gouw; Ramani Dinavahi; Anirban Maitra; Lorraine M Deck; Robert E Royer; David L Vander Jagt; Gregg L Semenza; Chi V Dang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Carnitines slow down tumor development of colon cancer in the DMH-chemical carcinogenesis mouse model.

Authors:  Giuseppe Roscilli; Emanuele Marra; Federica Mori; Arianna Di Napoli; Rita Mancini; Ottaviano Serlupi-Crescenzi; Ashraf Virmani; Luigi Aurisicchio; Gennaro Ciliberto
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 6.  Mitochondria and cancer.

Authors:  Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  The Warburg Effect: How Does it Benefit Cancer Cells?

Authors:  Maria V Liberti; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 13.807

8.  Analysis of GSH and GSSG after derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide.

Authors:  Daniela Giustarini; Isabella Dalle-Donne; Aldo Milzani; Paolo Fanti; Ranieri Rossi
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Induction of mitochondrial biogenesis protects against caspase-dependent and caspase-independent apoptosis in L6 myoblasts.

Authors:  Aaron D Dam; Andrew S Mitchell; Joe Quadrilatero
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-05-02

10.  Combination of sulindac and dichloroacetate kills cancer cells via oxidative damage.

Authors:  Kasirajan Ayyanathan; Shailaja Kesaraju; Ken Dawson-Scully; Herbert Weissbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Synergistic activation of mitochondrial metabolism and the glutathione redox couple protects HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells from palmitoylcarnitine-induced stress.

Authors:  Patrick C Turnbull; Ali C Dehghani; Christopher F Theriau; Michael K Connor; Christopher G R Perry
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 2.  The Role of Mitochondrial Fat Oxidation in Cancer Cell Proliferation and Survival.

Authors:  Matheus Pinto De Oliveira; Marc Liesa
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.