Literature DB >> 31483399

Long-Term Survivorship of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene for Osteonecrosis.

Adam Hart1, Viktor Janz1, Robert T Trousdale1, Rafael J Sierra1, Daniel J Berry1, Matthew P Abdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the hip is the underlying etiology for 3% to 12% of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Compared with patients who undergo THA because of osteoarthritis, those who do so because of osteonecrosis typically are younger, have a greater number of underlying diagnoses, and have inferior clinical outcomes and implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term implant survivorship (median follow-up, 10 years), functional outcomes, and radiographic results of contemporary THAs with a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner between patients with osteonecrosis and those with osteoarthritis.
METHODS: All patients who underwent primary THA with an HXLPE liner from 1999 to 2007 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Patients with a primary diagnosis of osteonecrosis were matched 1:1, on the basis of age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), to patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. This resulted in 461 hips in 413 patients with osteonecrosis matched to 461 hips in 427 patients with osteoarthritis (mean age, 59 years; 47% female; and mean BMI, 29 kg/m). Long-term implant survivorship, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic findings were compared. In addition, a subgroup analysis of the osteonecrosis group was performed to see whether certain underlying etiologies portended poor outcomes. The median follow-up was 10 years.
RESULTS: The 15-year cumulative rates of revision were 6.6% and 4.5% in the osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.8, p = 0.09). The 15-year cumulative rates of any reoperation were 10.5% and 6.4% in the osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively (HR = 2.2, p = 0.008). There were no radiographic signs of component loosening or osteolysis in the entire cohort. Despite a lower median preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) for patients with osteonecrosis, both groups had marked improvements in their scores, which were similar at all time points after surgery. The cumulative rate of reoperations at 15 years was 0% for hips with radiation-induced osteonecrosis, 6.3% for those with alcohol-induced osteonecrosis, 9.0% for those with posttraumatic osteonecrosis, 12.1% for those with steroid-induced osteonecrosis, and 25% for those with idiopathic osteonecrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary THA with an HXLPE liner offers excellent long-term implant survivorship and functional outcomes for patients with osteonecrosis; however, the risk of a reoperation is higher when compared with patients with osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483399     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Total Hip Arthroplasty via direct anterior approach for osteonecrosis; comparison with primary hip osteoarthritis in a mid term follow up.

Authors:  Alireza Moharrami; Seyed Peyman Mirghaderi; Shahin Marzban; Seyed Mir Mansour Moazen-Jamshidi; Delaram Shakoor; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-10-03

2.  Nomogram to predict collapse-free survival after core decompression of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  En-Ze Zhao; Zun-Han Liu; Wei-Nan Zeng; Zi-Chuan Ding; Zhen-Yu Luo; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Hytham S Salem; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Stuart B Goodman; Lynne C Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 4.  Periprosthetic Osteolysis: Mechanisms, Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Current Treatment Modalities for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ze-Qing Huang; Fan-Yu Fu; Wen-Long Li; Biao Tan; Hai-Jun He; Wen-Gang Liu; Wei-Heng Chen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing complications following total hip arthroplasty for systemic lupus erythematosus versus for non-systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Yiwei Huang; Danni Guan; Yijin Li; Jiahao Li; Yirong Zeng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  The role of internal fixation in the treatment of femoral head necrosis with ipsilateral hip fracture.

Authors:  Xinguo Zhang; Sikai Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Perioperative predictability of unsatisfactory functional outcomes 6 months after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Axel Jakuscheit; Johannes Weth; Gregor Lichtner; Konstantin Horas; Benno Rehberg-Klug; Falk von Dincklage
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-13

9.  Multiple drilling is not effective in reducing the rate of conversion to Total hip Arthroplasty in early-stage nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a case-control comparative study with a natural course.

Authors:  Zunhan Liu; Xuetao Yang; Yuhan Li; Wei-Nan Zeng; Enze Zhao; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Ten-year results of mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation augmented with vascularised bone grafts for advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Koji Goto; Tomoki Aoyama; Junya Toguchida; Yutaka Kuroda; Toshiyuki Kawai; Yaichiro Okuzu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.