Literature DB >> 31483167

Examining the Relationship Between Pre- and Postprandial Glucose Levels and Insulin Bolus Timing Using Bluetooth-Enabled Insulin Pen Cap Technology and Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Elena Toschi1,2,3, Christine Slyne1, Jordan M Greenberg1, Tori Greaves1, Astrid Atakov-Castillo1, Sam Carl1, Alyssa B Dufour3,4, Medha Munshi1,2,3.   

Abstract

Background: Timing of insulin administration in persons using multiple daily injections (MDI) is self-reported. New technology enabling tracking and logging of insulin doses, combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), may provide insight into the relationship between insulin administration and glucose levels.
Methods: We performed a prospective observational study using Bluetooth-enabled pen caps, along with CGM, in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on MDI to objectively assess the relationship between the timing of insulin administration and its impact on pre- and postprandial glucose levels for a 2-week period.
Results: We evaluated 50 participants (age 40.3 ± 19 years; A1c 8.2% ± 1.5%, duration of T1D 20 ± 15 years). Thirty-seven percent of total boluses resulted in persistent hyperglycemia (glucose >180 mg/dL 3 h postprandially), while 10% resulted in clinically significant hypoglycemia (glucose <55 mg/dL 3 h postprandially) on CGM. Preprandial glucose levels at the time of the bolus did not correlate with postprandial glucose levels. Late boluses, defined as a rise in glucose of ≥50 mg/dL before a bolus, were seen two times/patient/week. Missed boluses, defined as a rise in glucose of ≥50 mg/dL without a bolus within 2 h, occurred 17 times/patient/week. Late and missed boluses were associated with worse glycemic control (A1c; R2 = 0.1, P = 0.02; R2 = 0.1, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of Bluetooth-enabled pen caps, with CGM, in persons with T1D on MDI can illustrate the relationship between insulin bolus timing and postprandial glucose. These data may help clinicians and patients understand the impact of timing of insulin doses on glucose levels and glycemic control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bluetooth-enabled insulin pen cap; Continuous glucose monitoring; Multiple daily injections; Postprandial glucose; Technology; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483167     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  5 in total

1.  Can Smart Pens Help Improve Diabetes Management?

Authors:  Sarah L Sy; Medha M Munshi; Elena Toschi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 2.  Adherence and Persistence to Insulin Therapy in People with Diabetes: Impact of Connected Insulin Pen Delivery Ecosystem.

Authors:  Devin Steenkamp; Elizabeth L Eby; Nany Gulati; Birong Liao
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-05

3.  Smart Insulin Pens: Advancing Digital Transformation and a Connected Diabetes Care Ecosystem.

Authors:  Tejaswi Kompala; Aaron B Neinstein
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 4.  Digital Diabetes Management: A Literature Review of Smart Insulin Pens.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Oliver Schnell; Bernhard Gehr; Nanette C Schloot; Sven W Görgens; Christoph Görgen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-11

5.  Use of Connected Pen as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Missed Bolus Dosing Behavior in People with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Stephanie Edwards; Xuanyao He; Wenjie Wang; Jiat-Ling Poon; Eric Meadows; David Price; Jennal Johnson; Howard Wolpert; William Polonsky
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.