Pedro Pimenta de Mello Spineti1,2. 1. Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil. 2. Hospital Unimed-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil.
The World Health Organization defines biomarker as any substance, structure, or process
that can be measured in the body or its products and influences or predicts the
incidence or outcome of a disease.[1]Biomarkers can serve multiple purposes: diagnostic, disease staging,
prognostic and prediction and monitoring of responses to an intervention.[1]A useful biomarker should allow repeated and accurate measurements with a rapid
turnaround time at a reasonable cost, should provide information that is not already
available from careful clinical assessment and its performance should be superior to
other available tests, and should assist decision making and enhance clinical
care.[2]Several biomarkers have been studied in the context of acute and chronic heart failure
(HF). In 2016 the American Heart Association issued a statement on the Role of
Biomarkers for the Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Heart Failure.[3] After an extensive review, they stated
that a number of biomarkers associated with HF are well recognized, and measuring their
concentrations in circulation can be a convenient and noninvasive approach to provide
important information about disease severity and help in the detection, diagnosis,
prognosis, and management of HF. These include natriuretic peptides, soluble suppressor
of tumorigenicity 2 (ST-2), highly sensitive troponin, galectin-3, mid regional pro
adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), cystatin-C, interleukin-6 and procalcitonin. There is a need
to further evaluate existing and novel markers for guiding therapy.The 2018 Brazilian Guidelines on Chronic and Acute Heart Failure recommends the use of
natriuretic peptides with diagnostic and prognostic purposes.[3] According to these guidelines other biomarkers such as
troponins T and I, galectin-3 and ST-2 may add prognostic information in HFpatients.[4]More recently Swedish investigators reported that elevated plasma levels of NT-proBNP,
MR-proADM, copeptin, and cystatin C were associated with higher mortality after
discharge in a cohort of 286 patients hospitalized for newly diagnosed or exacerbated
HF.[5] Nonetheless, NT-proBNP was
the only biomarker to predict the risk of re-hospitalization due to cardiac causes.Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a biomarker associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic
disease. In 2016 Kamstrup and Nordestgaard demonstrated a clear stepwise association of
elevated Lp(a) levels with increased risk of HF in a study with more than 98,000 danish
participants.[5] In addition,
they provided genetic evidence that this association was mediated at least partly via
coronary heart disease (CAD) and aortic valve stenosis.This issue of Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia presents the paper of
Jianlong et al.[6] examining the
prognostic value of Lp(a) in Chinese patients admitted for decompensated HF of ischemic
origin. An Lp(a) greater than 20,6 mg/dL was associated with 3 fold increase in
readmission for HF. Patients with higher Lp(a) levels also had higher NT-proBNP levels,
higher NYHA class, lower left ventricle ejection fraction, more CAD. The results were
adjusted for theses covariates with a slight decrease in the hazard ratio.Lp(a) may be a prominent new biomarker in patients with HF of ischemic origin. More
studies in different populations are needed to validate these results.
Authors: Sheryl L Chow; Alan S Maisel; Inder Anand; Biykem Bozkurt; Rudolf A de Boer; G Michael Felker; Gregg C Fonarow; Barry Greenberg; James L Januzzi; Michael S Kiernan; Peter P Liu; Thomas J Wang; Clyde W Yancy; Michael R Zile Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 29.690