Eun Kyung Lee1, Seok-Mo Kim2, Bo Hyun Kim3, Min Joo Kim4,5, Dong-Jun Lim6, Min-Hee Kim6, Dong Yeob Shin7, Ho-Cheol Kang8, Byeong-Cheol Ahn9, Sun Wook Kim10, Hwa Young Ahn11, Young Joo Park4. 1. Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Thyroid Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea. 9. Department of Nuclear Medicine, School Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. 10. Department of Medicine, Thyroid Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 11. Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
Background: Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) recently approved for treating radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, has been shown to delay disease progression and provide meaningful benefit for overall survival (OS). However, there is no predictive marker for response to lenvatinib before initiating treatment. We comprehensively analyzed clinical and radiological parameters to predict response to lenvatinib using lesion-based assessments. Methods: Medical records were collected from 67 patients treated with lenvatinib in 11 referral hospitals across Korea from June 2015 to December 2017. Up to 96 measurable lesions, defined as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, were evaluated serially until progressive disease (PD) occurred, and tumor doubling time (TDT) was calculated based on changes between historical computed tomography (CT) scans and baseline CT scans performed at treatment initiation. Results: Excluding patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer, no thyroidectomy, nontarget lesions only, or treatment periods of <1 month, 57 patients were analyzed, of whom 7 (12.2%) were TKI-naive. The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-9.5), the median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI 12.4-not reached), the mean duration of response was 6.0 ± 4.4 months, and the objective response rate was 38%. In lesion-based assessments, 31 lesions (32.2%) with significant tumor shrinkage (complete remission or partial response) were significantly associated with shorter TDT (<12 months; p = 0.02). Patients with rapidly PD with a shorter initial TDT (<6 months) were more likely to respond to lenvatinib (p = 0.03). Patients exposed to lenvatinib at an average of ≥16 mg per day, or who were TKI-naive before treatment with lenvatinib, had a lower risk of progression; however, the risk reduction did not reach statistical significance (daily dosage p = 0.07, TKI exposure p = 0.09). Conclusions: TDT calculations at the beginning of treatment and lesion-based tumor assessment may help identify potential responders to lenvatinib therapy and predict therapeutic responses.
Background: Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) recently approved for treating radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, has been shown to delay disease progression and provide meaningful benefit for overall survival (OS). However, there is no predictive marker for response to lenvatinib before initiating treatment. We comprehensively analyzed clinical and radiological parameters to predict response to lenvatinib using lesion-based assessments. Methods: Medical records were collected from 67 patients treated with lenvatinib in 11 referral hospitals across Korea from June 2015 to December 2017. Up to 96 measurable lesions, defined as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, were evaluated serially until progressive disease (PD) occurred, and tumor doubling time (TDT) was calculated based on changes between historical computed tomography (CT) scans and baseline CT scans performed at treatment initiation. Results: Excluding patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer, no thyroidectomy, nontarget lesions only, or treatment periods of <1 month, 57 patients were analyzed, of whom 7 (12.2%) were TKI-naive. The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-9.5), the median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI 12.4-not reached), the mean duration of response was 6.0 ± 4.4 months, and the objective response rate was 38%. In lesion-based assessments, 31 lesions (32.2%) with significant tumor shrinkage (complete remission or partial response) were significantly associated with shorter TDT (<12 months; p = 0.02). Patients with rapidly PD with a shorter initial TDT (<6 months) were more likely to respond to lenvatinib (p = 0.03). Patients exposed to lenvatinib at an average of ≥16 mg per day, or who were TKI-naive before treatment with lenvatinib, had a lower risk of progression; however, the risk reduction did not reach statistical significance (daily dosage p = 0.07, TKI exposure p = 0.09). Conclusions: TDT calculations at the beginning of treatment and lesion-based tumor assessment may help identify potential responders to lenvatinib therapy and predict therapeutic responses.
Entities:
Keywords:
Korea; lenvatinib; lesion-based evaluation; progressive disease; thyroid cancer
Authors: Matti L Gild; Venessa H M Tsang; Roderick J Clifton-Bligh; Bruce G Robinson Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Anne Christine Kaae; Michael C Kreissl; Marcus Krüger; Manfred Infanger; Daniela Grimm; Markus Wehland Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 5.923