Literature DB >> 31482590

A two-phase Bayesian methodology for the analysis of binary phenotypes in genome-wide association studies.

Chase Joyner1, Christopher McMahan1,2, James Baurley3,2, Bens Pardamean2.   

Abstract

Recent advances in sequencing and genotyping technologies are contributing to a data revolution in genome-wide association studies that is characterized by the challenging large p small n problem in statistics. That is, given these advances, many such studies now consider evaluating an extremely large number of genetic markers (p) genotyped on a small number of subjects (n). Given the dimension of the data, a joint analysis of the markers is often fraught with many challenges, while a marginal analysis is not sufficient. To overcome these obstacles, herein, we propose a Bayesian two-phase methodology that can be used to jointly relate genetic markers to binary traits while controlling for confounding. The first phase of our approach makes use of a marginal scan to identify a reduced set of candidate markers that are then evaluated jointly via a hierarchical model in the second phase. Final marker selection is accomplished through identifying a sparse estimator via a novel and computationally efficient maximum a posteriori estimation technique. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach through extensive numerical studies, and consider a genome-wide application involving colorectal cancer.
© 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factors; EM algorithm; GWAS; MAP estimator; shrinkage prior

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31482590      PMCID: PMC8754502          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201900050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  15 in total

1.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  A hybrid bayesian approach for genome-wide association studies on related individuals.

Authors:  A Yazdani; D B Dunson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression.

Authors:  Tong Tong Wu; Yi Fang Chen; Trevor Hastie; Eric Sobel; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Eleftheria Zeggini; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 6.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Francis S Collins; Nancy J Cox; David B Goldstein; Lucia A Hindorff; David J Hunter; Mark I McCarthy; Erin M Ramos; Lon R Cardon; Aravinda Chakravarti; Judy H Cho; Alan E Guttmacher; Augustine Kong; Leonid Kruglyak; Elaine Mardis; Charles N Rotimi; Montgomery Slatkin; David Valle; Alice S Whittemore; Michael Boehnke; Andrew G Clark; Evan E Eichler; Greg Gibson; Jonathan L Haines; Trudy F C Mackay; Steven A McCarroll; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  GENERALIZED DOUBLE PARETO SHRINKAGE.

Authors:  Artin Armagan; David B Dunson; Jaeyong Lee
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

8.  Dragon (repulsive guidance molecule b, RGMb) is a novel gene that promotes colorectal cancer growth.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Guo-Bin Chen; Xiao-Xiao Huang; Chuan-Xing Xiao; Huan-Huan Wang; Ye-Sen Li; Jin-Fang Zhang; Shao Li; Yin Xia; Jian-Lin Ren; Bayasi Guleng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-21

9.  The putative tumor activator ARHGEF3 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell pathogenesis by inhibiting cellular apoptosis.

Authors:  Tian-Hao Liu; Fang Zheng; Mu-Yan Cai; Lin Guo; Huan-Xin Lin; Jie-Wei Chen; Yi-Ji Liao; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic risk factors for colorectal cancer in multiethnic Indonesians.

Authors:  Irawan Yusuf; Bens Pardamean; James W Baurley; Arif Budiarto; Upik A Miskad; Ronald E Lusikooy; Arham Arsyad; Akram Irwan; George Mathew; Ivet Suriapranata; Rinaldy Kusuma; Muhamad F Kacamarga; Tjeng W Cenggoro; Christopher McMahan; Chase Joyner; Carissa I Pardamean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Cancer Risk Score Prediction Based on a Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Network.

Authors:  Bharuno Mahesworo; Arif Budiarto; Alam Ahmad Hidayat; Bens Pardamean
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2022-07-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.