Literature DB >> 31482394

Central mfERG amplitude ratio as a predictor for visual outcome of macular hole surgery.

Renata Moreto1, Ana Claudia Brancato De Lucca Perches1, Felipe Almeida1, Rodrigo Jorge1, André Messias2, Katrin Gekeler3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether visual acuity improvement achieved after surgical treatment for macular hole (MH) can be predicted by preoperative multifocal ERG (mfERG) central/peripheral amplitude ratio.
METHODS: Thirty patients with unilateral MH were included. Evaluations with comprehensive ophthalmological examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were performed at baseline and 1, 3, 8, 24 and 48 weeks after surgery, while mfERG (Diagnosys LLC; 61 hexagons-30°) and spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (sOCT-Heidelberg Engineering) were performed at baseline and 2 months after surgery. mfERG results are shown by means of the ratio between the amplitudes' average from rings 1 and 2 (central) and rings 4 and 5 (peripheral): the P1 ratio. mfERG data from 20 normally sighted age-matched subjects was used for comparison. A macular hole index (MH index) was defined as the quotient between hole height and base measured on OCT.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients finished the 48-week follow-up. Mean ± SE (logMAR) preoperative BCVA was 0.93 ± 0.22 and improved in 0.25 ± 0.07 at 48 weeks. mfERG P1 ratio was reduced at baseline and increased significantly after surgery. A significant correlation was observed between preoperative P1 ratio and BCVA gain at week 8 (r = -0.42; P = 0.033). There was no significant correlation between preoperative MH index and postoperative BCVA (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Retinal function assessed using the ratio between central and peripheral mfERG responses might be used as predictor of visual acuity outcome after macular surgery for MH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ILM peeling; Macular hole; Multifocal electroretinography; Vitrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31482394     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09716-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  24 in total

1.  Multifocal ERG changes before and after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  M Moschos; M Apostolopoulos; J Ladas; P Theodossiadis; J Malias; M Moschou; A Papaspirou; G Theodossiadis
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  The multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Jeffrey G Odel; Candice S Chen; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  External limiting membrane and visual outcome in macular hole repair: spectral domain OCT analysis.

Authors:  G Landa; R C Gentile; P M T Garcia; T O Muldoon; R B Rosen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Y Miyake; M Horiguchi; N Tomita; M Kondo; A Tanikawa; H Takahashi; S Suzuki; H Terasaki
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Foveal structure defined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography correlates with visual function after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Kakarala V Chalam; Ravi K Murthy; Shailesh K Gupta; Vikram S Brar; Sandeep Grover
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for patients with an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Ternent; Luke Vale; Charles Boachie; Jennifer M Burr; Noemi Lois
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Association of the preoperative photoreceptor layer defect as assessed by optical coherence tomography with the functional outcome after macular hole closure: a long follow-up study.

Authors:  Vlassis G Grigoropoulos; George P Theodossiadis; Panagiotis G Theodossiadis
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Central photoreceptor viability and prediction of visual outcome in patients with idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Song Ee Chung; Dong Hui Lim; Se Woong Kang; Young Hee Yoon; Ju Byung Chae; In Ho Roh
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

9.  United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 2, macular hole.

Authors:  Timothy L Jackson; Paul H J Donachie; John M Sparrow; Robert L Johnston
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique and the Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole with Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Takehiro Matsumura; Yoshihiro Takamura; Takeshi Tomomatsu; Shogo Arimura; Makoto Gozawa; Akira Kobori; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Morphological and Functional Features in Patients with Idiopathic Macular Hole Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Li; Wenjuan Wang; Xiaodan Zhang; Jinxing Liu; Haining Zhang; Tong Cui; Fangfang Wang; Guohong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.