| Literature DB >> 31482120 |
Yongping Fu1, Matthew P Hautzinger1, Ziyu Luo2, Feifan Wang3, Dongxu Pan1, Michael M Aristov1, Ilia A Guzei1, Anlian Pan2, Xiaoyang Zhu3, Song Jin1.
Abstract
The stability and formation of a perovskite structure is dictated by the Goldschmidt tolerance factor as a general geometric guideline. The tolerance factor has limited the choice of cations (A) in 3D lead iodide perovskites (APbI3), an intriguing class of semiconductors for high-performance photovoltaics and optoelectronics. Here, we show the tolerance factor requirement is relaxed in 2D Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) perovskites, enabling the incorporation of a variety of larger cations beyond the methylammonium (MA), formamidinium, and cesium ions in the lead iodide perovskite cages for the first time. This is unequivocally confirmed with the single-crystal X-ray structure of newly synthesized guanidinium (GA)-based (n-C6H13NH3)2(GA)Pb2I7, which exhibits significantly enlarged and distorted perovskite cage containing sterically constrained GA cation. Structural comparison with (n-C6H13NH3)2(MA)Pb2I7 reveals that the structural stabilization originates from the mitigation of strain accumulation and self-adjustable strain-balancing in 2D RP structures. Furthermore, spectroscopic studies show a large A cation significantly influences carrier dynamics and exciton-phonon interactions through modulating the inorganic sublattice. These results enrich the diverse families of perovskite materials, provide new insights into the mechanistic role of A-site cations on their physical properties, and have implications to solar device studies using engineered perovskite thin films incorporating such large organic cations.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31482120 PMCID: PMC6716133 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Cent Sci ISSN: 2374-7943 Impact factor: 14.553
Figure 1Crystal structures of APbI3 and 2D RP perovskites of (HA)2(A)Pb2I7. (a) The schematic crystal structure of 3D lead iodide perovskites APbI3, A = Cs, MA, or FA. (b) Goldschmidt tolerance factor of APbI3 perovskite with different A cations. The inset images depict the molecular structures of A cations. Large organic cations, such as dimethylammonium (DMA), ethylammonium (EA), guanidinium (GA), and acetamidinium (AA), do not support a 3D perovskite structure. (c) Photographs of yellow nonperovskite structures of APbI3 with various A cations. (d) Photographs of red 2D RP perovskites of (HA)2(A)Pb2I7 with various A cations. (e) The schematic crystal structure of 2D RP perovskites of (HA)2(A)Pb2I7, where HA is n-hexylammonium and A = MA, FA, DMA, EA, GA, and AA. (f) PXRD patterns of the (HA)2(A)Pb2I7 crystalline powder products prepared by antisolvent growth of APbI3 with excessive n-hexylammonium iodide, in comparison with the calculated PXRD pattern of (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. (g) Absorption spectra of the suspension solutions of (HA)2(A)Pb2I7 with various cations.
Figure 2Crystal structure of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 in comparison with (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. (a) Top-view of the crystal structures of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. (b) Side-view of the crystal structures of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 along a direction and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 along c direction. (c) Comparison of the perovskite cages of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. Also illustrated is the definition of the distance of the N atom in HA from the iodide plane. (d) PXRD and (e) optical images of single-crystal flakes of (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 (top) and (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 (bottom). The diffraction peaks of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 appear at higher angles than those of (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7, indicating even smaller interlayer distance in the former.
Complete Crystal Data and Structure Refinement of (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 at 100 K
| compound name | (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 | (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 |
|---|---|---|
| empirical formula | (C6H13NH3)2(CH3NH3)Pb2I7 | (C6H13NH3)2[C(NH2)3]Pb2I7 |
| formula weight | 665.04 | 1567.16 |
| crystal system | monoclinic | triclinic |
| space group | ||
| 45.146(16); 90 | 8.8195(14); 79.965(13) | |
| 8.814(3); 100.030(5) | 9.0300(15); 87.341(9) | |
| 8.695(3); 90 | 21.699(4); 89.986(10) | |
| volume/Å3 | 3407(2) | 1699.8(5) |
| Z | 4 | 2 |
| ρcalc, g/cm3 | 3.000 | 3.062 |
| reflections collected | 61721 | 28779 |
| independent reflections | 3931 [ | 28779 [ |
| goodness-of-fit on | 1.061 | 1.047 |
| final | ||
| final | ||
| largest diff. peak/hole/e Å–3 | 2.36/–1.32 | 2.40/–1.74 |
Comparison of the Structural and Bonding Parameters between (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7
| structural parameters | (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 | (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 | difference (GA-MA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| volume of cage (Å3) | 250.2589 | 264.446 | 14.187 |
| 6.1905 | 6.3112 | 0.1207 | |
| 6.5150 | 6.6412 | 0.1262 | |
| 15.713 | 14.702 | –1.011 | |
| ammonium - iodide plane
distance | 0.75 | 0.834 | 0.084 |
| Pb–I–Pb angle ( | 155.73 | 162.02 | 6.29 |
| Pb–I–Pb angle ( | 179.228 | 178.87 | –0.358 |
| bond angle variance (σ2, deg2) | 10.5161 | 15.1104 | 4.5943 |
| quadratic elongation (⟨λ⟩) | 1.0031 | 1.0046 | 0.0015 |
Figure 3Comparison of the optical properties of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. (a) Absorption spectra, (b) steady-state PL, and (c) time-resolved PL of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 single-crystals.
Figure 4Comparison of phonon properties of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7. (a,b) Low-frequency Raman spectra of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 single crystals at three temperatures. (c) 2D pseudocolor plots of temperature-dependent PL spectra of (HA)2(GA)Pb2I7 and (HA)2(MA)Pb2I7 single crystals. (d) The corresponding PL emission line widths as a function of temperature together with their fits.