| Literature DB >> 31481946 |
Guosheng Zhang1,2,3, Yaqing Zheng1,2,3, Yuxin Ma1,2,3, Le Yang1,2,3, Meihua Xie1,2,3, Duanxu Zhou1,2,3, Xuemei Niu1,2,3, Ke-Qin Zhang1,2,3, Jinkui Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
The velvet family proteins VosA and VelB are involved in growth regulation and differentiation in the model fungus Aspergillus nidulans and other filamentous fungi. In this study, the orthologs of VosA and VelB, AoVosA, and AoVelB, respectively, were characterized in the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora, which captures nematodes by producing trapping devices (traps). Deletion of the AovelB gene resulted in growth defects in different media, and the aerial hyphae from the ΔAovelB mutant lines were fewer in number and their colonies were less dense than those from the wild-type (WT) strain. The ΔAovelB mutants each displayed serious sporulation defects, and the transcripts of several sporulation-related genes (e.g., abaA, flbC, rodA, and vosA) were significantly down-regulated compared to those from the WT strain. Furthermore, the ΔAovelB mutant strains became more sensitive to chemical reagents, including sodium dodecyl sulfate and H2O2. Importantly, the ΔAovelB mutants were unable to produce nematode-capturing traps. Similarly, extracellular proteolytic activity was also lower in the ΔAovelB mutants than in the WT strain. In contrast, the ΔAovosA mutants displayed no obvious differences from the WT strain in these phenotypic traits, whereas conidial germination was lower in the ΔAovosA mutants, which became more sensitive to heat shock stress. Our results demonstrate that the velvet protein AoVelB is essential for conidiation, trap formation, and pathogenicity in A. oligospora, while AoVosA plays a role in the regulation of conidial germination and heat shock stress.Entities:
Keywords: Arthrobotrys oligospora; conidiation; mutants; pathogenicity; trap formation; velvet proteins
Year: 2019 PMID: 31481946 PMCID: PMC6710351 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Comparison of colony morphology and mycelial growth between the wild type (WT) and mutant lines. (A) Colonies from the WT and mutant lines were incubated on TYGA media for 5 days at 28°C. (B) Mycelial growth rates of the WT and mutants on PDA, TYGA, and TG plates.
FIGURE 2Comparison of mycelial morphology between the wild type (WT) and mutant lines. WT and mutants were cultured for 7 days on CMY plates at 28°C. Mycelial samples were collected and treated as previously described (Kim et al., 2004). (A) Mycelial morphologies of the WT and ΔAovelB mutants as observed by light microscopy. Bar: 100 μm. (B,C) The WT strain and ΔAovelB mutant were coated with gold and observed by scanning electron microscopy.
FIGURE 3Comparison of conidiation and the transcriptional levels of sporulation-related genes between the wild type (WT) and mutant lines. (A) Conidiophore differentiation in the WT and mutant lines. (B) Sporulation in the WT and mutant lines on CMY medium. (C) The relative transcriptional levels (RTLs) of genes AovosA and AovelB during the vegetative growth and conidiation in A. oligospora. (D) RTLs of sporulation-related genes in the mutants compared with the WT strain at different time points. CK. The level of each gene was computed as a ratio of the transcript level of the gene in the deletion mutant to that in the WT strain under a given condition. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Effect of AoVosA on heat shock stress in A. oligospora. (A) Colonies from the WT strain and ΔAovosA mutants were incubated on PDA for 5 days at 28, 34, and 40°C. (B) Mycelial growth rates of the WT and ΔAovosA mutants on PDA at the three temperatures. (C) Conidia germination rates for the WT strain and ΔAovosA mutants at 28 and 34°C. (D) Spore survival rate of the WT strain and ΔAovosA mutants treated by heat shock at 28, 34, 38, and 42°C. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Comparison of stress tolerance to cell wall perturbing agents. (A) Colony morphology of the WT and mutants incubated on TG medium supplemented with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or Congo red. (B) The colony diameters of the WT and mutants after incubated on TG medium supplemented with 0.01–0.03% SDS or 0.05–0.09 mg/mL Congo red for 5 days. (C) Relative transcriptional levels (RTLs) of cell wall synthesis-related genes in the mutants compared with the WT strain at different time points. CK. The level of each gene was computed as a ratio of the transcript level of the gene in the deletion mutant to that in the WT strain under a given condition. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Comparison of stress tolerance to oxidative agents. (A) Colony morphologies of the WT and mutant lines incubated on TG medium supplemented with H2O2 or menadione. (B). Colony diameters of the WT and mutants after incubation on TG medium supplemented with 5–15 mM H2O2 or 0.01–0.05 mM menadione for 5 days. (C) Relative transcriptional levels (RTLs) of oxidation-related genes in the mutants compared with the WT strain at different time points. CK. The level of each gene was computed as a ratio of the transcript level of the gene in the deletion mutant to that in the WT strain under a given condition. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Comparison of extracellular proteolytic activity. (A) Comparison of the extracellular proteolytic activities of the WT and mutant lines on casein plates. (B) Total extracellular protease activity quantified from 7 days old PL-4 cultures. (C) Relative transcriptional levels (RTLs) of serine protease genes in the ΔAovelB andΔAovosA mutants compared with the WT strain at different time points. CK. The level of each gene was computed as a ratio of the transcript level of the gene in the deletion mutant to that in the WT strain under a given condition. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 8Comparison of trap formation and nematicidal activity in the WT and mutant lines. (A) Trap formation in the WT and mutant lines induced by nematodes at different time points. The arrows show the traps produced by the WT strain and ΔAovosA mutants. Bar: 100 μm. (B) The relative transcriptional levels (RTLs) of genes AovosA and AovelB in A. oligospora during different induction times by nematodes. (C) Nematode-induced trap numbers produced by the WT and mutant lines at 24 h. (D) The percentage values for the nematodes captured by the WT and mutant lines at different time points. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05).