| Literature DB >> 31481900 |
Guang-Hui Tang1,2,3, Ying Xiong1,2,3, Yi Liu1,2,3, Zhong-Hao Song1,2,3, Yang Yang1,2,3, Guang-Mao Shen1,2,3, Jin-Jun Wang1,2,3, Hong-Bo Jiang1,2,3.
Abstract
Pesticide resistance is a serious problem that poses a major challenge to pest control. One of the most potent resistance mechanisms is the overexpression of genes coding for detoxification enzymes. The expression of detoxification genes is regulated by a series of transcription factors. Previous studies have revealed that the increased expression of detoxification genes contributes to the insecticide tolerance of Bactrocera dorsalis. Our objective was thus to identify the transcription factors involved in this process. Temporal expression profiles showed that the transcription factor MafB and detoxification genes were expressed highly in the fat body. Further analysis showed that the expression of MafB, GSTz2, and CYP473A3 was induced by abamectin. Disruption of the MafB transcription factor through RNA interference decreased the transcript levels of GSTz2 and CYP473A3 and increased the susceptibility to abamectin significantly. Direct silencing of the expression of GSTz2 also increased susceptibility to abamectin, while CYP473A3 did not. In conclusion, these results suggest that the expression of GSTz2 and CYP473A3 was regulated by the transcription factor MafB, and the up-regulation of GSTz2 via MafB decreased the susceptibility of B. dorsalis to abamectin.Entities:
Keywords: GST; MafB; abamectin; oriental fruit fly; transcription factor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31481900 PMCID: PMC6710445 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Primers for MafB used in the study.
| Full-length | ATGAGAATGGAAGACCCAAACC | |
| GCAAGTTGGCGTCAGAGA | ||
| RT-qPCR | GAAATCTACACGCACGGACC | |
| AGGATCTGAACGCATGGAGT | ||
| dsRNA synthesis | ||
FIGURE 1Sequence and phylogenetic tree of MafB. (A) Phylogenetic tree of MafBs. Amino acid sequences of B. dorsalis MafB and dipteran MafB were aligned to forming phylogenetic tree to assess their relationships. MafB of B. dorsalis was indicated by the red rectangle. (B) The amino acid sequence structure of MafB. The basic leucine and zipper (bZIP) domain are indicated by blue background and red color. DNA-binding site and dimer interface domain are indicated by yellow and purple core color, respectively.
FIGURE 2The transcriptional expression profiles of MafB and detoxification enzymes in three different tissues of B. dorsalis. MT, Malpighian tubules; MG, midgut; FB, fat body. The expression of MafB and detoxification enzymes of B. dorsalis was log2 transformed. Different colors represent the degree of expression, red and blue indicate upregulation and downregulation, respectively.
FIGURE 3The transcriptional expression profiles of MafB and GSTe6, GSTz2, CYP4AC4, CYP437A3, and aE6 of B. dorsalis in the fat body by abamectin treatment. The data shown are mean ± SE (n = 3). Relative expression was calculated based on the value of acetone. Asterisks (∗ and ∗∗) above the error bars present statistical differences determined by the independent samples t-test with P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
FIGURE 4Susceptibility of B. dorsalis to abamectin after MafB knockdown by RNAi. (A) Relative expression levels of MafB after B. dorsalis adults were injected with dsMafB compared to dsGFP, a double-stranded green fluorescent protein RNA. (B) Mortality rate for the dsMafB- and dsGFP-injected flies after abamectin treatment. Asterisks (∗ and ∗∗) above the error bars present statistical differences determined by the independent samples t-test with P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
FIGURE 5Susceptibility of B. dorsalis to abamectin after GSTz2 and CYP437A3 knockdown by RNAi. (A) Relative expression levels of GSTz2 and CYP437A3 after B. dorsalis adults were injected with dsGSTz2 and dsCYP437A3, respectively, compared to dsGFP, a double-stranded green fluorescent protein RNA. (B) Mortality rate for the dsGSTz2 and dsCYP437A3 and dsGFP-injected flies after abamectin treatment. Asterisks (∗ and ∗∗) above the error bars present statistical differences determined by the independent samples t-test with P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.