| Literature DB >> 31481845 |
Yasunori Nonoue1,2, Kiyosumi Hori1,2, Nozomi Ono2, Taeko Shibaya2, Eri Ogiso-Tanaka1,2, Ritsuko Mizobuchi1,2, Shuichi Fukuoka1,2, Masahiro Yano1,2.
Abstract
IR64 is one of the world's most popular rice cultivars. To collect genetic factors involved in controlling its heading date, we developed 70 reciprocal advanced-backcross populations with a total of 6284 individuals at the BC4F2 generation from crosses between Koshihikari and IR64. We detected 29 QTLs associated with heading date on chromosomes 3, 5-8, 10, and 12. Twenty QTLs were located in the same chromosome regions as previously isolated heading date genes (Hd1, Hd6, Hd16, Ghd7, DTH8, Hd17, and Hd18). The rest were located in other chromosome regions. We found more number of QTLs than previous studies using mapping populations of IR64. Fine mapping in additional advanced-backcross populations clearly revealed that QTLs on the long arm of chromosome 7 are overlapping and seem to be a novel genetic factor for heading date because of their different locations from OsPRR37. Our results suggest that the difference in heading date between IR64 and Koshihikari is genetically controlled by many factors, and that a non-functional allele of Hd1 contributes to early heading of IR64 in the genetic background of functional alleles of other heading date QTLs and genes such as Hd6 and Hd16.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza sativa L.; heading date; quantitative trait loci (QTLs); rice
Year: 2019 PMID: 31481845 PMCID: PMC6711732 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.18172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1Chromosomal locations of QTLs for days to heading under natural field conditions. Arrowheads to the right of the linkage map indicate QTLs detected in BC4F2 populations with ▲▼ Koshihikari and IR64 genetic backgrounds: ▲ early and ▼ late heading date by IR64 alleles. Triangles to the left indicate approximate locations of 13 heading date genes isolated previously. Heading date genes showing polymorphisms of the coding sequences between Koshihikari and IR64.
Heading date QTLs detected in BC4F2 populations in the Koshihikari genetic background (A) and in the IR64 genetic background (B)
| A | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| BC4F2 population | Chr. | Marker interval | Nearest marker | LOD | Additive effect | Dominance effect | PVE (%) | Corresponding gene |
| K05 | 7 | RM7479–RM5499 | RM8006 | 5.4 | −4.4 | −1.2 | 64.0 | |
| K06 | 7 | RM8006–RM3832 | RM5499 | 5.7 | −5.0 | 0.6 | 67.0 | |
| K07 | 3 | RM4352–RM1338 | RM4352 | 5.6 | −4.1 | 1.2 | 76.0 | |
| K08 | 3 | RM6736–RM1352 | RM1352 | 7.1 | −4.1 | 0.3 | 56.0 | |
| K09 | 3 | RM1352–RM3329 | RM1352 | 16.3 | −12.6 | 5.1 | 92.0 | |
| K11 | 7 | RM5499–RM5481 | RM3832 | 4.1 | −3.2 | −0.7 | 55.0 | |
| K13 | 5 | RM4501–RM3809 | RM3476 | 3.7 | −2.3 | 0.3 | 52.0 | |
| K14 | 6 | RM8121–RM3805 | RM8121 | 2.8 | 3.1 | −0.8 | 44.0 | |
| K15 | 6 | RM5585–RM19951 | RM5585 | 5.3 | 5.5 | −1.6 | 67.0 | |
| K16 | 6 | RM5585–RM19951 | RM19951 | 8.4 | 6.1 | 0.6 | 85.0 | |
| K19 | 7 | RM5499–RM3832 | RM5499 | 8.4 | −4.2 | 1.6 | 46.0 | |
| 7 | RM3404–RM1330 | RM6326 | 4.9 | −2.2 | −0.8 | 16.0 | ||
| K20 | 8 | RM1148–RM6838 | RM1148 | 8.0 | −4.6 | 1.0 | 83.0 | |
| K24 | 6 | RM8121–RM3805 | RM8121 | 5.9 | 2.8 | −0.3 | 68.0 | |
| K25 | 6 | RM8121–RM4608 | RM3805 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 74.0 | |
| K27 | 7 | RM8006–RM3832 | RM8006 | 8.1 | −5.0 | 1.1 | 67.0 | |
| K29 | 6 | Hd1ID006–RM19951 | RM19830 | 12.4 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 64.0 | |
| 12 | RM3747–RM27724 | RM27724 | 3.9 | −2.8 | −0.6 | 6.0 | ||
| K30 | 12 | RM7102–RM28305 | RM28112 | 7.4 | −2.6 | −0.3 | 76.0 | |
|
| ||||||||
| B | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| BC4F2 population | Chr. | Marker interval | Nearest marker | LOD | Additive effect | Dominance effect | PVE (%) | Corresponding gene |
|
| ||||||||
| I06 | 3 | RM6736–RM1352 | RM5813 | 4.3 | −3.2 | 0.6 | 56.0 | |
| I16 | 6 | RM5585–RM19830 | Hd1ID006 | 23.1 | 37.7 | 21.8 | 93.7 | |
| I18 | 6 | RM8121–RM4608 | RM8121 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 7.3 | 17.0 | |
| 6 | RM5585–RM19830 | Hd1ID006 | 20.9 | 38.1 | 27.8 | 60.3 | ||
| I19 | 6 | RM5585–RM19830 | Hd1ID006 | 29.7 | 38.4 | 21.6 | 95.0 | |
| I21 | 7 | RM8006–RM3832 | RM8006 | 3.0 | −2.3 | 1.5 | 44.0 | |
| I22 | 7 | RM1330–RM7601 | RM1330 | 4.1 | −2.1 | −1.7 | 61.0 | |
| I23 | 7 | RM6326–RM1330 | RM6326 | 4.9 | −1.9 | −1.6 | 61.0 | |
| I25 | 8 | RM22679–RM6032 | RM6032 | 3.7 | 2.2 | −1.1 | 56.0 | |
| I32 | 10 | RM6737–RM1162 | RM1162 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 43.0 | |
Loglikelihood value. LOD threshold to detect QTLs was determined in each BC4F2 population.
Additive effect of Koshihikari allele on days to heading.
Dominance effect of Koshihikari allele on days to heading.
Percentage of phenotypic variance explained by QTL.
Previously identified heading date genes corresponding to the QTLs detected in this study based on their physical positions on IRGSP 1.0.
Fig. 2Graphical genotypes and positions of the QTLs for heading date that were detected on the long arm of Chr. 7 by the results of substitution mapping in three additional BC4F2 populations: 368 plants in the Koshihikari genetic background (K-32 and K-33) or 186 plants in the IR64 genetic background (I-37). ■ Homozygous for IR64, □ homozygous for Koshihikari. Significance levels calculated by the Tukey’s HSD test.