Rachel Howard1, Aaron Scheiner2, Peter A Kanetsky2, Kathleen M Egan2. 1. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL. Electronic address: rachel.howard@moffitt.org. 2. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation with established prognostic value in patients with cancer. Although high NLR is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, factors that influence the magnitude of NLR independently of disease are poorly understood. METHODS: We identified 48,023 adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2016). Demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors associated with the magnitude of NLR after adjusting for comorbidities including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension, and medications including aspirin, were identified. Effect modification by comorbidity status and demographics was explored. RESULTS: Female gender, age less than 60 years, and non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity were associated with lower NLR. Marital statuses of widowed, separated, or never married demonstrated increased NLR as compared with those who were currently married. Never-smoking and moderate alcohol consumption were associated with lower NLR. Participation in physical activity was associated with decreased NLR after adjustment for potential confounders, primarily among non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple demographic and lifestyle factors are independently associated with NLR. Sex, age, race, marital status, body mass index, physical activity, smoking history, and alcohol consumption should all be routinely collected and adjusted for to improve the accuracy of assessment of the prognostic power of NLR.
PURPOSE: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation with established prognostic value in patients with cancer. Although high NLR is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, factors that influence the magnitude of NLR independently of disease are poorly understood. METHODS: We identified 48,023 adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2016). Demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors associated with the magnitude of NLR after adjusting for comorbidities including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension, and medications including aspirin, were identified. Effect modification by comorbidity status and demographics was explored. RESULTS: Female gender, age less than 60 years, and non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity were associated with lower NLR. Marital statuses of widowed, separated, or never married demonstrated increased NLR as compared with those who were currently married. Never-smoking and moderate alcohol consumption were associated with lower NLR. Participation in physical activity was associated with decreased NLR after adjustment for potential confounders, primarily among non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple demographic and lifestyle factors are independently associated with NLR. Sex, age, race, marital status, body mass index, physical activity, smoking history, and alcohol consumption should all be routinely collected and adjusted for to improve the accuracy of assessment of the prognostic power of NLR.
Authors: Maryam Salah Al-Mazedi; Rajesh Rajan; Mohammed Al-Jarallah; Raja Dashti; Ahmad Al Saber; Jiazhu Pan; Kobalava D Zhanna; Hassan Abdelnaby; Wael Aboelhassan; Farah Almutairi; Naser Alotaibi; Mohammad Al Saleh; Noor AlNasrallah; Bader Al-Bader; Haya Malhas; Maryam Ramadhan; Peter A Brady; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Parul Setiya; Mohammed Abdullah; Moudhi Alroomi; Gary Tse Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2022-10-01
Authors: Angelo Zinellu; Elisabetta Zinellu; Maria Carmina Pau; Ciriaco Carru; Pietro Pirina; Alessandro G Fois; Arduino A Mangoni Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: R Bou Khalil; N Risch; G Sleilaty; S Richa; M Seneque; P Lefebvre; A Sultan; A Avignon; L Maimoun; E Renard; P Courtet; S Guillaume Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 3.008
Authors: Renata Libianto; Jinbo Hu; Min R Chee; Jesse Hoo; Yin Y Lim; Jimmy Shen; Qifu Li; Morag J Young; Peter J Fuller; Jun Yang Journal: J Endocr Soc Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: David J Cote; Jordan H Creed; Claudine M Samanic; Travis A Gerke; Meir J Stampfer; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Kathleen M Egan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Michal Mleko; Kazimierz Pitynski; Elzbieta Pluta; Aleksandra Czerw; Katarzyna Sygit; Beata Karakiewicz; Tomasz Banas Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Konstantin Schlick; Teresa Magnes; Florian Huemer; Lukas Ratzinger; Lukas Weiss; Martin Pichler; Thomas Melchardt; Richard Greil; Alexander Egle Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 4.241