| Literature DB >> 31480353 |
Suh-Ching Yang1, Wen-Ching Huang2, Xin Er Ng3, Mon-Chien Lee4, Yi-Ju Hsu4, Chi-Chang Huang4, Hai-Hsin Wu2, Chiu-Li Yeh1, Hitoshi Shirakawa5, Slamet Budijanto6, Te-Hsuan Tung1, Yu-Tang Tung7,8,9.
Abstract
Obesity has become an epidemic worldwide. It is a complex metabolic disorder associated with many serious complications and high morbidity. Rice bran is a nutrient-dense by product of the rice milling process. Asia has the world's highest rice production (90% of the world's rice production); therefore, rice bran is inexpensive in Asian countries. Moreover, the high nutritional value of the rice bran suggests its potential as a food supplement promoting health improvements, such as enhancing brain function, lowering blood pressure, and regulating pancreatic secretion. The present study evaluated the anti-obesity effect of rice bran in rats with high-energy diet (HED)-induced obesity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into one of five diet groups (n = 10 per group) and fed the following for eight weeks: Normal diet with vehicle treatment, HED with vehicle, rice bran-0.5X (RB-0.5X) (2% wt/wt rice bran), RB-1.0X (4% wt/wt rice bran), and RB-2.0X (8% wt/wt rice bran). Rice bran (RB-1.0X and RB-2.0X groups) markedly reduced obesity, including body weight and adipocyte size. In addition, treating rats with HED-induced obesity using rice bran significantly reduced the serum uric acid and glucose as well as the liver triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC). Furthermore, administration of an HED to obese rats significantly affected hepatic lipid homeostasis by increasing phosphotidylcholine (PC; 18:2/22:6), diacylglycerol (DG; 18:2/16:0), DG (18:2/18:1), DG (18:1/16:0), cholesteryl ester (CE; 20:5), CE (28:2), TG (18:0/16:0/18:3), and glycerol-1-2-hexadecanoate 3-octadecanoate. However, the rice bran treatment demonstrated an anti-adiposity effect by partially reducing the HED-induced DG (18:2/18:1) and TG (18:0/16:0/18:3) increases in obese rats. In conclusion, rice bran could act as an anti-obesity supplement in rats, as demonstrated by partially reducing the HED-induced DG and TG increases in obese rats, and thus limit the metabolic diseases associated with obesity and the accumulation of body fat and hepatic lipids in rats.Entities:
Keywords: high-energy diet (HED); lipid metabolism; lipidomics; obesity; rice bran
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480353 PMCID: PMC6769848 DOI: 10.3390/nu11092033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Comparison of the physical and metabolic effects of rice bran (RB) in rat groups.
| Vehicle | HED | RB-0.5X | RB-1.0X | RB-2.0X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water (mL) | 45.3 ± 0.8 b | 26.3 ± 0.4 a | 25.8 ± 0.2 a | 26.7± 0.3 a | 25.0 ± 0.3 a |
| Food intake (g/day) | 23.3 ± 0.4 a | 23.5 ± 0.4 a | 23.6 ± 0.4 a | 23.0 ± 0.3 a | 23.2 ± 0.4 a |
| Energy intake (kcal/day) | 77.9 ± 1.3 a | 99.2 ± 1.6 b | 99.9 ± 1.9 b | 98.2 ± 1.5 b | 99.4 ± 1.7 b |
| Feed efficiency 1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 a | 0.9 ± 0.2 a | 0.8 ± 0.2 a | 0.8 ± 0.2 a | 0.8 ± 0.1 a |
| Final body weight (g) | 416 ± 8 a | 487 ± 5 c | 472 ± 4b c | 466 ± 8 b | 463 ± 5 b |
| Body weight gain (g) | 97.1 ± 4.4a | 168.1 ± 5.4 b | 149.1 ± 2.5 b | 148.4 ± 6.1 b | 146.8 ± 14.3 b |
| Liver | 11.55 ± 0.41 a | 15.34 ± 0.28 b | 14.09 ± 0.23 b | 14.09 ± 0.23 b | 14.24 ± 0.42 b |
| Omental fat | 3.74 ± 0.33 a | 7.03 ± 0.57 b | 6.40 ± 0.40 b | 7.10 ± 1.14 b | 6.48 ± 0.64 b |
| Epididymal fat | 3.33 ± 0.36 a | 7.56 ± 0.53 b | 6.62 ± 0.26 b | 6.75 ± 0.75 b | 6.96 ± 0.65 b |
| Total fat | 9.51 ± 0.88 a | 24.40 ± 1.50 b | 22.65 ± 0.76 b | 23.76 ± 1.81 b | 23.36 ± 1.80 b |
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 10). Different letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 in the one-way ANOVA. Column titles indicate the following: Vehicle, Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat fed chow diet; high-energy diet (HED), SD rat fed HED; RB-0.5X, SD rat fed HED with RB-0.5X; RB-1.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-1.0X; RB-2.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-2.0X. 1 Feed efficiency = weight gain/food intake.
Effect of RB on the serum biochemical parameters in rats with high-energy diet (HED)-induced obesity.
| Vehicle | HED | RB-0.5X | RB-1.0X | RB-2.0X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 3.0 ± 0.4 a | 6.4 ± 0.6 c | 4.5 ± 0.2 b | 3.8 ± 0.6 ab | 2.6 ± 0.3 a |
| GOT (U/L) | 64 ± 2 a | 66 ± 2 a | 63 ± 2 a | 62 ± 1 a | 64 ± 1 a |
| FFA (mmol/L) | 0.62 ± 0.03 a | 1.04 ± 0.06 b | 0.95 ± 0.07 b | 0.88 ± 0.09 b | 1.03 ± 0.07 b |
| TC (mg/dL) | 59 ± 4 a | 75 ± 4 b | 72 ± 5 b | 68 ± 4 ab | 69 ± 6 ab |
| TG (mg/dL) | 40 ± 3 a | 155 ± 13 b | 135 ± 13 b | 137 ± 16 b | 133 ± 10 b |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 35.3 ± 2.3 a | 35.4 ± 0.8 a | 37.8 ± 2.5 a | 34.8 ± 1.8 a | 36.1 ± 2.6 a |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 14.0 ± 1.1 a | 11.5 ± 0.8 a | 11.8 ± 1.1 a | 11.4 ± 1.1 a | 11.4 ± 1.1 a |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 153 ± 8 a | 341 ± 25 c | 250 ± 14 b | 283 ± 24 b | 283 ± 8 b |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 10). Different letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 in one-way ANOVA. Vehicle, SD rat fed chow diet; HED, SD rat fed HED; RB-0.5X, SD rat fed HED with RB-0.5X; RB-1.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-1.0X; RB-2.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-2.0X.
Figure 1Effect of rice bran (RB) on the hepatic lipid accumulation in rats with high-energy diet (HED)-induced obesity. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections (100× magnification). Scale bar: 40 μm. (B) Liver triglyceride (TG) concentration and (C) liver total cholesterol (TC) concentration. The x-axis parameters are as follows: Vehicle, SD rat fed with chow diet; HED, SD rat fed with HED; RB-0.5X, SD rat fed with HED and RB-0.5X; RB-1.0X, SD rat fed with HED and RB-1.0X; and RB-2.0X, SD rat fed with HED and RB-2.0X. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 10). Different letters (a, b, and c) indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2Effect of RB on body weight and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) change in rats with HED-induced obesity. (A) Body weight change over time; (B) hematoxylin and eosin staining of eWAT sections (×100 magnification). Scale bar: 40 μm. Vehicle, SD rat fed chow diet; HED, SD rat fed HED; RB-0.5X, SD rat fed HED with RB-0.5X; RB-1.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-1.0X; RB-2.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-2.0X. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 10).
Figure 3Score plots of the serum samples from the vehicle and HED groups. (A) principal component analysis (PCA) score plot and (B) orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plot. Vehicle, SD rat fed chow diet; HED, SD rat fed HED.
Figure 4Score plots of the serum samples from the HED and RB-2.0X groups. (A) PCA score plot and (B) OPLS-DA score plot. HED, SD rat fed HED; RB-2.0X, SD rat fed HED with RB-2.0X.