| Literature DB >> 31480144 |
C Buranakarl1, S Thammacharoen1, S Semsirmboon1, S Sutayatram1, S Chanpongsang2, N Chaiyabutr1, K Katoh3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the beneficial effects of dietary supplementation with oil palm frond (leaf) (OPF) with and without oil palm meal (OPM) on nutrient intake and digestibility, ruminal fermentation and growth performance in goats.Entities:
Keywords: Goat; Nutrient Digestibility; Oil Palm Frond; Oil Palm Meal; Ruminal Fermentation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480144 PMCID: PMC7206385 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Nutritional composition of experimental diets (% DM)
| Items | DM | ADF | NDF | CP | EE | Ash | TDN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 (paragrass) | 15.6 | 35.4 | 58.4 | 11.4 | 1.7 | 11.9 | 43.7 |
| Treatment 2 (paragrass + OPF) | 30.5 | 36.4 | 52. 9 | 11.5 | 2.5 | 10.6 | 49.7 |
| Treatment 3 (paragrass + OPF + OPM) | 35.3 | 38.9 | 54.4 | 11.3 | 3.6 | 9.8 | 49.2 |
DM, dry matter; ADF, acid detergent fiber; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; TDN, total digestible nutrients; OPF, oil palm frond; OPM, oil palm meal.
Changes of body weight, intake of feed, dry matter and water, rectal temperature and respiratory rate in goats fed three different diets recorded for a period of 28 days duration
| Items | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (kg) | 15.6 | 15.7 | 15.6 | 0.4 | 0.987 |
| % BW change | 1.39 | 5.04 | 4.89 | 0.80 | 0.311 |
| FI (% kg BW) | 11.33 | 9.37 | 8.62 | 0.34 | 0.0001 |
| DMI (% kg BW) | 2.10 | 2.83 | 2.80 | 0.06 | 0.0001 |
| WI (L/d) | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.004 |
| RT (°C) | 38.4 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 0.04 | 0.982 |
| RR (breaths/min) | 21.8 | 21.1 | 20.4 | 0.4 | 0.101 |
SEM, standard error of mean; BW, body weight; FI, feed intake; DMI, dry matter intake; WI, water intake; RT, rectal temperature; RR, respiratory rate.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).
The average nutrient intakes and apparent nutrient digestibility measured for 5 days at the end of each period in goats fed three different diets
| Items | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient intakes (percent of body weight/d) | |||||
| Feed | 12.21 | 10.00 | 8.89 | 0.41 | <0.0001 |
| DM | 2.29 | 3.03 | 2.91 | 0.10 | 0.0002 |
| ADF | 0.79 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.04 | 0.0002 |
| NDF | 1.32 | 1.55 | 1.53 | 0.04 | 0.009 |
| Protein | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.01 | <0.0001 |
| Fat | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.01 | <0.0001 |
| Apparent digestibility (%) | |||||
| DM | 47.9 | 52.3 | 50.5 | 1.8 | 0.408 |
| ADF | 35.7 | 30.0 | 28.3 | 2.6 | 0.126 |
| NDF | 48.3 | 46.2 | 45.8 | 1.9 | 0.674 |
| Protein | 65.3 | 60.7 | 55.4 | 1.6 | 0.003 |
| Fat | 56.5 | 42.7 | 57.4 | 2.2 | 0.001 |
SEM, standard error of mean; DM, dry matter; ADF, acid detergent fiber; NDF, neutral detergent fiber.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).
Ruminal protozoa and volatile fatty acid contents and urinary allantoin creatinine ratio in goats fed three different diets
| Items | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rumen protozoa | |||||
| Total count (cell/mm3) | 60.4 | 55.0 | 97.2 | 13.6 | 0.320 |
| | 0.2 | 7.2 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.157 |
| | 1.4 | 0 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 0.029 |
| | 54.7 | 69.2 | 59.3 | 3.6 | 0.284 |
| | 39.3 | 22.1 | 29.4 | 3.3 | 0.159 |
| | 4.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.408 |
| Ruminal VFA (mmol/L) | |||||
| Acetic acid (C2) | 101.8 | 110.2 | 105.5 | 7.8 | 0.774 |
| Propionic acid (C3) | 28.2 | 27.5 | 23.8 | 1.5 | 0.227 |
| Butyric acid (C4) | 6.6 | 7.3 | 6.3 | 0.5 | 0.495 |
| C2/C3 | 3.61 | 4.17 | 4.78 | 0.33 | 0.004 |
| Rumen pH | 7.23 | 7.33 | 7.10 | 0.05 | 0.075 |
| U-allantoin/UCr (mg/mgCr) | 1.19 | 2.00 | 1.87 | 0.10 | 0.0002 |
SEM, standard error of mean; VFA, volatile fatty acid; U-allantoin, urinary allantion; UCr, urinary creatinine.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).
The complete blood count and chemistry profiles in goats fed three different diets
| Items | T1 | T2 | T3 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete blood count | |||||
| PCV (%) | 36.0 | 35.0 | 36.8 | 0.8 | 0.102 |
| HGB (g/L) | 112.5 | 110.0 | 114.7 | 2.3 | 0.210 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 20.8 | 22.9 | 20.8 | 0.6 | 0.128 |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 505.3 | 522.5 | 524.0 | 29.1 | 0.969 |
| Blood chemistry | |||||
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 3.86 | 3.73 | 3.92 | 0.09 | 0.550 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.57 | 5.38 | 5.22 | 0.17 | 0.676 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 113.0 | 113.5 | 114.2 | 2.0 | 0.970 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 15.0 | 19.6 | 21.8 | 1.5 | 0.003 |
| ALP (U/L) | 238 | 258 | 350 | 65 | 0.033 |
| Protein (Biuret) (g/L) | 56.7 | 52.5 | 53.3 | 1.4 | 0.610 |
| Protein (ref) g/L) | 68.7 | 67.3 | 69.0 | 1.0 | 0.509 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 38.0 | 36.0 | 38.3 | 1.5 | 0.092 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.44 | 2.55 | 2.92 | 0.16 | 0.047 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.47 | 0.03 | 0.127 |
SEM, standard error of mean; PCV, packed cell volume; HGB, hemoglobin; WBC, white blood cell; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; ALT, alanine transminase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ref, refractometer.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).