Mayuka Hayashida1, Akiko Miki2, Hisanori Imai1, Keiko Otsuka1, Atsushi Azumi3, Makoto Nakamura1. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, acacyey@med.kobe-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention for dense vitreous hemorrhage (DVH) with unclear etiology is often delayed in favor of conservative follow-up despite possible disease progression and the availability of safe minimally invasive vitrectomy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of early surgical intervention for DVH with unknown etiology. METHODS: Eighty-eight cases (88 eyes) of DVH with unknown origin were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) measured visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse and (2) fundus invisibility requiring B-scan ultrasonography. Eyes with a history of diabetic retinopathy, recent trauma, or likely retinal detachment (RD) as revealed by B-scan ultrasonography were excluded. Outcome measures were a cause of vitreous hemorrhage and final VA following early (≤2 weeks after symptom onset) or delayed vitrectomy. RESULTS: The most frequently occurring causes of DVH were central or branch retinal vein occlusion (30 eyes, 34%) and retinal tear or RD (29 eyes, 33%). logMAR VA significantly improved after treatment (p < 0.001). Final VA was significantly higher for eyes treated within 2 weeks compared with eyes treated later than 2 weeks after symptom onset (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention within 2 weeks after symptom onset may prevent a lower visual outcome.
BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention for dense vitreous hemorrhage (DVH) with unclear etiology is often delayed in favor of conservative follow-up despite possible disease progression and the availability of safe minimally invasive vitrectomy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of early surgical intervention for DVH with unknown etiology. METHODS: Eighty-eight cases (88 eyes) of DVH with unknown origin were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) measured visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse and (2) fundus invisibility requiring B-scan ultrasonography. Eyes with a history of diabetic retinopathy, recent trauma, or likely retinal detachment (RD) as revealed by B-scan ultrasonography were excluded. Outcome measures were a cause of vitreous hemorrhage and final VA following early (≤2 weeks after symptom onset) or delayed vitrectomy. RESULTS: The most frequently occurring causes of DVH were central or branch retinal vein occlusion (30 eyes, 34%) and retinal tear or RD (29 eyes, 33%). logMAR VA significantly improved after treatment (p < 0.001). Final VA was significantly higher for eyes treated within 2 weeks compared with eyes treated later than 2 weeks after symptom onset (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention within 2 weeks after symptom onset may prevent a lower visual outcome.