| Literature DB >> 31479808 |
Qian Wang1, Chang Zhu1, Xiaoxiao Huang1, Gang Yang2.
Abstract
Abiotic reduction represents an attractive technology to control U(VI) contamination. In this work, an abiotic route of U(VI) reduction with humic acid at mineral surfaces is proposed and reaction mechanisms are addressed by periodic density functional theory calculations. Different influencing factors such as ligand effect, content of CO32- ligands and substituent effect are inspected. The coordination chemistry of uranyl(VI) surface complexes relies strongly on substrates and ligands, and the calculated results are in good agreements with experimental observations available. For the OH- ligand, two competitive mechanisms co-exist that respectively produce the U(IV) and U(V) species, and the former is significantly preferred because of lower energy barriers. Instead, the NO3- ligand leads to the formation of U(V) while for the Cl- ligand, the U(VI) surface complex remains very stable and is not likely to be reduced because of very high energy barriers. The U(V) and U(IV) complexes are the predominant products for low and high CO32- contents, respectively. Accordingly, the abiotic reduction processes with humic acid are efficient to manage U(VI) contamination and become preferred under basic conditions or at higher CO32- contents. The U(VI) reduction is further promoted by introduction of electron-donating rather than electron-withdrawing substituents to humic acid. Electronic structure analyses and vibrational frequency assignments are calculated for the various uranium surface complexes of the reduction processes, serving as a guide for future experimental and engineered studies. The molecular-level understanding given in this work offers an abiotic route for efficient reduction of U(VI) and remediation of U(VI)-contaminated sites at ambient conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Abiotic reduction; Humic substances; Ligand effect; Substituent effect; Uranium contamination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31479808 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071