Jack M Qian1, James B Yu2, Amit Mahajan3, Sarah B Goldberg4, Harriet M Kluger4, Veronica L S Chiang5. 1. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; present affiliation at Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: veronica.chiang@yale.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An increasing number of clinical trials are studying immunotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases. The role of local therapy in this setting has not been well described. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three melanoma patients with brain metastases were treated with pembrolizumab in a prospective phase 2 trial, NCT02085070, and included in this secondary analysis. Patients had at least 1 untreated or progressive brain metastasis, 5 to 20 mm in size, without any associated neurologic symptoms. Local therapy (stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, or laser interstitial thermal therapy) was used to treat concerning lesions immediately before trial enrollment and was also allowed on trial in patients whose brain metastases were progressing, but who were otherwise deriving benefit. RESULTS: In total, 13 out of 23 patients (57%) received local therapy immediately before or during the trial-4 patients received local therapy before the trial owing to lesion size or location in sensitive areas; 6 during the trial because of tumor growth, hemorrhage, or radiation necrosis/cystic changes; and 3 both before and during the trial. Of the 10 patients who did not receive local therapy immediately before or during the trial, 8 patients (35%) did not later receive local therapy owing to rapid disease progression, and only 2 patients (9%) lived for 2 years without requiring any local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local therapy continues to play an important role in the management of melanoma patients with brain metastases being treated with immunotherapy. These patients should be closely monitored via serial brain imaging, with a multidisciplinary team involved in clinical decision making to ensure each patient's neurologic safety.
PURPOSE: An increasing number of clinical trials are studying immunotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases. The role of local therapy in this setting has not been well described. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three melanomapatients with brain metastases were treated with pembrolizumab in a prospective phase 2 trial, NCT02085070, and included in this secondary analysis. Patients had at least 1 untreated or progressive brain metastasis, 5 to 20 mm in size, without any associated neurologic symptoms. Local therapy (stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, or laser interstitial thermal therapy) was used to treat concerning lesions immediately before trial enrollment and was also allowed on trial in patients whose brain metastases were progressing, but who were otherwise deriving benefit. RESULTS: In total, 13 out of 23 patients (57%) received local therapy immediately before or during the trial-4 patients received local therapy before the trial owing to lesion size or location in sensitive areas; 6 during the trial because of tumor growth, hemorrhage, or radiation necrosis/cystic changes; and 3 both before and during the trial. Of the 10 patients who did not receive local therapy immediately before or during the trial, 8 patients (35%) did not later receive local therapy owing to rapid disease progression, and only 2 patients (9%) lived for 2 years without requiring any local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local therapy continues to play an important role in the management of melanomapatients with brain metastases being treated with immunotherapy. These patients should be closely monitored via serial brain imaging, with a multidisciplinary team involved in clinical decision making to ensure each patient's neurologic safety.
Authors: Georgios P Skandalakis; Daniel R Rivera; Caroline D Rizea; Alexandros Bouras; Joe Gerald Jesu Raj; Dominique Bozec; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Annemarie C Eggen; Thijs T Wind; Ingeborg Bosma; Miranda C A Kramer; Peter Jan van Laar; Hiska L van der Weide; Geke A P Hospers; Mathilde Jalving Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Annemarie C Eggen; Geke A P Hospers; Ingeborg Bosma; Miranda C A Kramer; Anna K L Reyners; Mathilde Jalving Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 4.430