Literature DB >> 31479647

Cytoskeletal polarization and cytokinetic signaling drives polar lobe formation in spiralian embryos.

Leslie Toledo-Jacobo1, John H Henson2, Charles B Shuster3.   

Abstract

In many spiralians, asymmetry in the first two cleavages is achieved through the formation of a polar lobe (PL), which transiently constricts to sequester vegetal cytoplasm into the CD and D blastomeres. While microtubules and actin filaments are required for polar lobe formation, little else is known regarding the structural and functional similarities with the contractile ring, or how the PL constriction is able to form perpendicular to the cleavage plane. Examination of scallop embryos revealed that while activated myosin II could be detected in both the cleavage furrow and early PL constriction, astral or central spindle microtubules were not observed associated with the PL neck until the constriction was nearly complete. Further, inhibition of Aurora B had no effect on polar lobe initiation, but blocked both contractile ring ingression and PL constriction beyond phase II. The cortex destined for PL sequestration was marked by enrichment of the Arp2/3 complex, which was first detected during meiosis and remained enriched at the vegetal pole through the first two cleavages. Inhibition of Arp2/3 affected PL formation and partitioning of cytoplasm into the two daughter cells, suggesting that Arp2/3 plays a functional role in defining the zone of cortex to be sequestered into the polar lobe. Together, these data offer for the first time a mechanism by which a cytoskeletal specialization defines the polar lobe in this atypical form of asymmetric cell division.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arp2/3; Cytokinesis; Embryo; Mollusk; Polar lobe; Spiralian

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479647      PMCID: PMC6925573          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  49 in total

Review 1.  Cleavage furrow formation and ingression during animal cytokinesis: a microtubule legacy.

Authors:  Pier Paolo D'Avino; Matthew S Savoian; David M Glover
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility.

Authors:  Laurent Blanchoin; Rajaa Boujemaa-Paterski; Cécile Sykes; Julie Plastino
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  A soft cortex is essential for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Agathe Chaigne; Clément Campillo; Nir S Gov; Raphaël Voituriez; Jessica Azoury; Claudia Umaña-Diaz; Maria Almonacid; Isabelle Queguiner; Pierre Nassoy; Cécile Sykes; Marie-Hélène Verlhac; Marie-Emilie Terret
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Molecular pathways regulating mitotic spindle orientation in animal cells.

Authors:  Michelle S Lu; Christopher A Johnston
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Cell specification and the role of the polar lobe in the gastropod mollusc Crepidula fornicata.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Henry; Kimberly J Perry; Mark Q Martindale
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Polar lobe formation and cytokinesis in fertilized eggs of Ilyanassa obsoleta. I. Ultrastructure and effects of cytochalasin B and colchicine.

Authors:  G W Conrad; D C Williams
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin.

Authors:  Jennifer Landino; Ryoma Ohi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Establishment and activity of the D quadrant organizer in the marine gastropod Crepidula fornicata.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Henry; Deirdre C Lyons; Kimberly J Perry; C Cornelia Osborne
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  CYK-4 regulates Rac, but not Rho, during cytokinesis.

Authors:  Yelena Zhuravlev; Sophia M Hirsch; Shawn N Jordan; Julien Dumont; Mimi Shirasu-Hiza; Julie C Canman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Stable and dynamic microtubules coordinately shape the myosin activation zone during cytokinetic furrow formation.

Authors:  Victoria E Foe; George von Dassow
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division.

Authors:  Bharath Sunchu; Clemens Cabernard
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Mechanical regulation of cell size, fate, and behavior during asymmetric cell division.

Authors:  Melissa K Delgado; Clemens Cabernard
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 8.382

3.  Rac and Arp2/3-Nucleated Actin Networks Antagonize Rho During Mitotic and Meiotic Cleavages.

Authors:  Debadrita Pal; Andrea Ellis; Silvia P Sepúlveda-Ramírez; Torey Salgado; Isabella Terrazas; Gabriela Reyes; Richard De La Rosa; John H Henson; Charles B Shuster
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-11-17

4.  Wnt signaling polarizes cortical actin polymerization to increase daughter cell asymmetry.

Authors:  Yongping Chai; Dong Tian; Zhiwen Zhu; Yuxiang Jiang; Shanjin Huang; Dou Wu; Guangshuo Ou; Wei Li
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 10.849

5.  Combined effect of cell geometry and polarity domains determines the orientation of unequal division.

Authors:  Benoit G Godard; Remi Dumollard; Carl-Philipp Heisenberg; Alex McDougall
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Nonmuscle Myosin II is Required for Larval Shell Formation in a Patellogastropod.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Pin Huan; Baozhong Liu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.