Literature DB >> 31479406

Prognostic Value of Variant Histology in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Keiichiro Mori1,2, Florian Janisch1,3, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi1,4, Hadi Mostafaei1,5, Ivan Lysenko1, Shoji Kimura1,2, Dmitry V Enikeev6, Shin Egawa2, Shahrokh F Shariat1,7,8,9,10,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the prognostic value of variant histology in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed®, Web of Science™, Cochrane Library and Scopus® databases in May 2019 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared overall, cancer specific and recurrence-free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma with or without variant histology. Formal meta-analyses were performed for these outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 32 studies with 16,052 patients, including 26 studies with 12,865 patients that were eligible for the meta-analysis. Variant histology was associated with poor outcomes in terms of cancer specific (pooled HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.56), overall (pooled HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.04) and recurrence-free survival (pooled HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.89). Subgroup analyses revealed that micropapillary (pooled HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.34), and squamous and/or glandular variant histologies (pooled HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.92) were also associated with poor cancer specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Variant histology in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma is associated with an increased risk of cancer specific and overall mortality and disease recurrence. Furthermore, variant histology was independently associated with cancer specific survival in the micropapillary, and squamous and/or glandular variant histology subgroups. It may be useful to incorporate variant histology into prognostic tools that help guide patients and physicians in selecting appropriate treatment strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinoma; histology; meta-analysis; transitional cell; urologic neoplasms; urothelium

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479406     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Lo; Wei-Ming Li; Hung-Lung Ke; Yi-Huei Chang; Hsi-Chin Wu; I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Jen-Tai Lin; Chao-Yuan Huang; Chung-Hsin Chen; Jen-Shu Tseng; Wun-Rong Lin; Yuan-Hong Jiang; Yu-Khun Lee; Chung-You Tsai; Shiu-Dong Chung; Thomas Y Hsueh; Allen W Chiu; Yeong-Chin Jou; Ian-Seng Cheong; Yung-Tai Chen; Jih-Sheng Chen; Bing-Juin Chiang; Chih-Chin Yu; Wei Yu Lin; Chia-Chang Wu; Chuan-Shu Chen; Han-Yu Weng; Yao-Chou Tsai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Involvement of FGFR4 Gene Variants on the Clinicopathological Severity in Urothelial Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Dow Tsay; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Chia-Yi Lee; Shian-Shiang Wang; Chuan-Shu Chen; Sheng-Chun Hung; Chia-Yen Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Current Knowledge on Genomic Profiling of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Fabrizio Longo; Carolina Bebi; Luca Boeri; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Stefania Zamboni; Luca Afferi; Benjamin Pradere; Mohammad Abufaraj; Francesco Soria; David D'Andrea; Morgan Roupret; Alexandre De la Taille; Claudio Simeone; Agostino Mattei; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Manfred Peter Wirth; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Simone; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Di Bona; Giancarlo Marra; Andrea Mari; Ettore Di Trapani; Mario Alvarez Maestro; Wojciech Krajewski; Shahrokh F Shariat; Evanguelos Xylinas; Philipp Baumeister
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-09-04

5.  Impact of Pathology Review in Adverse Histological Characteristics and pT Stages of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer in a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Chia-Hui Chang; Wen-Jeng Wu; Hsiang-Ying Lee; Chih-Hung Lin; Chung-Tai Yue; Yuan-Hong Jiang; Yu-Khun Lee; Kuan Hsun Huang; Yao Chou Tsai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Anuj Kumar Yadav; Tarun Pareek; Pawan Kaundal; Shantanu Tyagi; Sudheer Kumar Devana; Shrawan Kumar Singh
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Impact of Variant Histology on Clinical and Pathological Outcomes in Patients with the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Meylis Artykov; Hakan Bahadır Haberal; Mesut Altan; Kemal Kosemehmetoglu; Sertac Yazici; Haluk Ozen; Bulent Akdogan
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 8.  [Molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder-background and clinical relevance].

Authors:  Philipp Erben; Christoph Becker; Igor Tsaur; Matthias B Stope; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.