João Luiz Gomes Parizi1,2, Marcela Leal da Cruz1, Maria Cristina Andrade2, Gilmar Garrone1, Sérgio Leite Ottoni1, Sérgio Cavalheiro3,4, Antonio Moron5,4, Antonio Macedo1,2. 1. Department of Urology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Santa Joana Maternity Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Obstetrics-Fetal Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In utero myelomeningocele closure is a valid alternative to postnatal repair with unclear benefits to bladder function. We compared bladder status in patients who underwent fetal myelomeningocele surgery versus postnatal repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database, with group 1 consisting of in utero surgery and group 2 consisting of postnatal repair. Group 3 was a subgroup of group 2, including patients initially presenting at age less than 12 months. We recorded medical history, radiological investigation with renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, urodynamic evaluation and clinical outcome of the bladder pattern after treatment. RESULTS: We identified 88 patients in group 1, 86 in group 2 and 38 in group 3. The incidence of urinary tract infection was higher in the postnatal period (45% vs 20%). Hydronephrosis occurred in 20.7%, 22.6% and 28.9% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Vesicoureteral reflux was diagnosed in 15% in all groups. Urodynamic data showed a higher prevalence of detrusor overactivity in group 1 and no difference in other urodynamic parameters. The high risk bladder pattern at initial evaluation occurred in 56%, 50% and 46% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was a trend to decrease the percentages of the high risk bladder pattern and to increase the normal pattern after treatment in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In utero repair did not improve urological parameters compared to repair in the postnatal period.
PURPOSE: In utero myelomeningocele closure is a valid alternative to postnatal repair with unclear benefits to bladder function. We compared bladder status in patients who underwent fetal myelomeningocele surgery versus postnatal repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database, with group 1 consisting of in utero surgery and group 2 consisting of postnatal repair. Group 3 was a subgroup of group 2, including patients initially presenting at age less than 12 months. We recorded medical history, radiological investigation with renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, urodynamic evaluation and clinical outcome of the bladder pattern after treatment. RESULTS: We identified 88 patients in group 1, 86 in group 2 and 38 in group 3. The incidence of urinary tract infection was higher in the postnatal period (45% vs 20%). Hydronephrosis occurred in 20.7%, 22.6% and 28.9% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Vesicoureteral reflux was diagnosed in 15% in all groups. Urodynamic data showed a higher prevalence of detrusor overactivity in group 1 and no difference in other urodynamic parameters. The high risk bladder pattern at initial evaluation occurred in 56%, 50% and 46% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was a trend to decrease the percentages of the high risk bladder pattern and to increase the normal pattern after treatment in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In utero repair did not improve urological parameters compared to repair in the postnatal period.
Authors: Abigail Wilpers; Anna Y Lynn; Barbara Eichhorn; Amy B Powne; Megan Lagueux; Janene Batten; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar; Cary P Gross Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 2.208