Literature DB >> 31478800

Determining Malignant Potential of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: CT versus MRI by Using Revised 2017 International Consensus Guidelines.

Ji Eun Lee1, Seo-Youn Choi1, Ji Hye Min1, Boem Ha Yi1, Min Hee Lee1, Seung Soo Kim1, Jeong Ah Hwang1, Jung Hoon Kim1.   

Abstract

Background Several changes have been made to the revised 2017 international consensus guidelines for management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). However, the diagnostic performance is yet to be verified. Purpose To evaluate the revised guidelines for predicting malignant potential of pancreatic IPMNs and to compare diagnostic performance and intermodality agreement between contrast material-enhanced CT and MRI. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, two radiologists analyzed the preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI of patients with surgically resected pancreatic IPMNs from January 2007 to December 2017. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI were analyzed by using receiver operating curve analysis. Intermodality agreement was assessed by using weighted κ and intraclass correlation coefficient values. Results A total of 86 patients (mean age, 67.6 years ± 8.9 [standard deviation]; 47 men and 39 women) with pancreatic IPMNs (benign, 58; malignant, 28) were included. At both CT and MRI, enhancing mural nodule (P < .001), abrupt main pancreatic duct caliber change (P < .001), lymphadenopathy (P = .006), larger main pancreatic duct size (P = .003), and faster cyst growth rate (P = .04) were more common in malignant than benign IPMNs. Irrespective of the modality, enhancing mural nodule of 5 mm or greater had the highest odds ratio (25 at CT vs 29 at MRI). The diagnostic performance of CT (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.92]) and MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86 [95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.95]) for predicting malignant IPMNs were comparable (P = .43), with good intermodality agreement (κ = 0.70). Conclusion Among revised features, enhancing mural nodule of 5 mm or greater had the strongest association with malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and diagnostic performance for prediction of malignant IPMNs were comparable between contrast-enhanced CT and MRI with good intermodality agreement. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31478800     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Prognosis of resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: using revised 2017 international consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Honsoul Kim; Dong Lk Cha; Soohyun Ahn
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  Multimodal radiomics and cyst fluid inflammatory markers model to predict preoperative risk in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Kate A Harrington; Travis L Williams; Sharon A Lawrence; Jayasree Chakraborty; Mohammad A Al Efishat; Marc A Attiyeh; Gokce Askan; Yuting Chou; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Caitlin A McIntyre; Mithat Gonen; Olca Basturk; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Jeffrey A Drebin; Richard K Do; Peter J Allen; Amber L Simpson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 3.  Narrative review of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of a true precancerous lesion.

Authors:  Gang Ma; Guichen Li; Zhihuan Xiao; Anjiang Gou; Yuanhong Xu; Shaowei Song; Kejian Guo; Zhe Liu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

4.  Utility of gadolinium for identifying the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  Andrea S Kierans; Alexander Gavlin; Natasha Wehrli; Laura M Flisnik; Sarah Eliades; Meredith E Pittman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 5.  Ductal Dilatation of ≥5 mm in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Should Trigger the Consideration for Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Resected Cases.

Authors:  Y H Andrew Wu; Atsushi Oba; Laurel Beaty; Kathryn L Colborn; Salvador Rodriguez Franco; Ben Harnke; Cheryl Meguid; Daniel Negrini; Roberto Valente; Steven Ahrendt; Richard D Schulick; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Intraductal Pancreatic Mucinous Neoplasms: A Tumor-Biology Based Approach for Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Vincenzo Nasca; Marta Chiaravalli; Geny Piro; Annachiara Esposito; Lisa Salvatore; Giampaolo Tortora; Vincenzo Corbo; Carmine Carbone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Radiomic nomogram based on MRI to predict grade of branching type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Sijia Cui; Tianyu Tang; Qiuming Su; Yajie Wang; Zhenyu Shu; Wei Yang; Xiangyang Gong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Cavernous hemangioma of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen mimicking a pancreatic tumor: A case report.

Authors:  Jia-Yan Huang; Rui Yang; Jia-Wu Li; Qiang Lu; Yan Luo
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  Automated Detection of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions on CT Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Lorraine Abel; Jakob Wasserthal; Thomas Weikert; Alexander W Sauter; Ivan Nesic; Marko Obradovic; Shan Yang; Sebastian Manneck; Carl Glessgen; Johanna M Ospel; Bram Stieltjes; Daniel T Boll; Björn Friebe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 10.  Pathology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Naziheh Assarzadegan; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevan Salimian; Matthias M Gaida; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Laura Wood; Syed Z Ali; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.